Rate The Last Movie You Saw

[-KhaN-]

Kick-Ass 2: 7/10

Was stuck between giving this 6 or 7. In the end decided to give it 7 as I did quite enjoy it. Yes, it is very silly in places but I did find myself laughing a few times and oddly a bit emotional at some scenes. A good watch.

To be honest I can't remember my rating for Kick Ass 2...I only remember first one was a lot better and second one was "meh" not that good.

[simopic]

"12 Years a Slave", 8/10

[Gabrielle947]

I seem to be alone in my opinion that this movie is as lame as can be. That's with Scorsese being my favorite director.
omg,our tastes are alike! Well,I enjoyed Shutter Island but I think it's very mediocre.

[-KhaN-]

omg,our tastes are alike! Well,I enjoyed Shutter Island but I think it's very mediocre.

http://i.imgur.com/aEAn3zl.gif
Hehehehe,just a joke :P ...Now seriously move on and tell your friends this movie is epic! :D

[mojofilter]

https://sp.yimg.com/ib/th?id=H.4562424749949132&pid=15.1

3


https://sp2.yimg.com/ib/th?id=H.4997234282987830&pid=15.1

3.5

[Lucas]

In a Lonely Place-Good film,the final 10 minutes are astounding and changed my entire perspective on the film. I need to rewatch this sometime as when viewing it I was expecting it to be one type of film when it ended up being another.Humphrey Bogart is awesome. 3.5

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/e4/In_a_lonely_place_1950_poster.jpg

[M+F Reviews]

To be honest I can't remember my rating for Kick Ass 2...I only remember first one was a lot better and second one was "meh" not that good.

I agree not as good as the first but still enjoyable and easy to watch.

[Guaporense]

Shutter Island

First time watching this and I was blown away. Great plot twist at the end that made complete sense and made the movie worthwhile. Leo's acting is once again top notch and makes the movie much more enjoyable.

9.25/10

It's one of Scorsese's best movies (taking into consideration it's Scorsese!)

[s1n1st3r]

http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/media/2013/05/man-of-steel-posters-visuasys.jpg

Man of Steel

First of all I should start by saying I hate Superman out of all the major superheroes created. I do not see what the hype was with this movie (first time watching) the origin story was bland, the movie seemed to cut to his childhood every 5 seconds. The action sequences were good I guess but how long is it going to take to build Metropolis again? (I guess until Batman vs Superman comes out). I wont go into why I hate Superman as a hero (hint he can die by a rock from his own planet, but now his whole planet can kill him), I am not hyped for the next movie in the franchise at all! The only saving grace I thought was General Zod and his female commander they seemed interesting to me and she was a badass!

1.5/5 stars (only for the badguys)

[Mmmm Donuts]

American Hustle

http://www.rhymeswithgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/AMERICAN-HUSTLE-poster-1050x700.jpg

Finally got around to seeing this in the theaters with my buddy.

I had a fun time with this one. It was really enjoyable, blending comedy with drama well. Of course, this is largely a performance-driven movie, but I thought the plot was still pretty strong and unique. There were a few moments where I began to lull off, though. The shots were very nice, and I really liked the early 80's feel it had going on, especially when they visited places likes the casino or the party scenes.

As one might expect, I loved Christian Bale in this. He puts on such a show with his character, and you could kind of tell that he was really enjoying portraying this con man with a heart. Everything, from his dreadful hair to his body language, made me laugh and really feel for this guy.

Amy Adams was fantastic. If there was any actor/actress who could pull my attention away from Bale, it was her. A combination of sexy, interesting, and just downright real. As far as emotional range went, I feel like she had the most on her shoulders, and she filled those expectations brilliantly.

Hmmm, Jennifer Lawrence. I know that most people have been absolutely raving about her performance here, but I don't think I quite got it. It was certainly good, but I just don't about it being Oscar-worthy. She had a number of really funny, really memorable moments, but I felt like something was off, like when she wasn't acting completely crazy. Maybe it's just in contrast to the fine work of the other cast members, I don't know. Just wasn't feeling it.

Bradley Cooper and Jeremy Renner both did a really good job. I think they got their characters perfectly (especially Renner, as the first ever lovable corrupt mayor).

Unfortunately, I felt as though the ending fell a bit flat, and was a bit rushed. I was honestly confused for about a minute after the credits rolled, and had to replay some of the moments in my head to understand everything that wrapped up.

All in all, I think this is certainly a movie worth giving at least one watch.

8.5/10

[Godoggo]

I seem to be alone in my opinion that this movie is as lame as can be. That's with Scorsese being my favorite director.

You're not alone. I thought it was pretty bad.

[mark f]

Unfortunately, I felt as though the ending fell a bit flat, and was a bit rushed. I was honestly confused for about a minute after the credits rolled, and had to replay some of the moments in my head to understand everything that wrapped up.
Well, I thought the ending was the best part; Christian Bale's most-shining moments. :)

[rauldc14]

Goodfellas great film 8.5/10 on a rewatch.

[rauldc14]

Well, I thought the ending was the best part; Christian Bale's shining moments. :)

Thought it was great too. Glad that we got 2 great films this year in Gravity and American Hustle.

[cricket]

Get Carter (1971) 3.5

This is a really good crime picture with a great performance from Michael Caine. I've always thought of Caine as the great, old, supporting actor. Not anymore; he kicks ass!

[Mmmm Donuts]

Well, I thought the ending was the best part; Christian Bale's most-shining moments. :)

Thought it was great too. Glad that we got 2 great films this year in Gravity and American Hustle.

Interesting. I just didn't get what happened with De Niro's character.

BTW, Louis CK was also very funny in this. Or at least what happened to him. :D

[Lucas]

The Counselor-This film got bashed by the critics,but guess what...they are wrong. This movie is really good, definitely not for everybody but it is worth a viewing especially if you enjoy nihilistic crime films. The photography is vibrant, the acting is great, and its entertaining if you come into this knowing its a bleak,dialogue-driven film. It's not great, I can see the flaws. But it makes me mad that sometimes when an ambitious film comes out it gets bashed to death. Give this a look guys, it's worth a viewing.3.5

http://www.comingsoon.net/gallery/86506/The_Counselor_9.jpg

[Stag Hunter]

http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/media/2013/05/man-of-steel-posters-visuasys.jpg

Man of Steel

First of all I should start by saying I hate Superman out of all the major superheroes created. I do not see what the hype was with this movie (first time watching) the origin story was bland, the movie seemed to cut to his childhood every 5 seconds. The action sequences were good I guess but how long is it going to take to build Metropolis again? (I guess until Batman vs Superman comes out). I wont go into why I hate Superman as a hero (hint he can die by a rock from his own planet, but now his whole planet can kill him), I am not hyped for the next movie in the franchise at all! The only saving grace I thought was General Zod and his female commander they seemed interesting to me and she was a badass!

1.5/5 stars (only for the badguys)

You're definitely not alone. I've never liked any of the Superman movies. The animated series, however, was pretty good.

[rauldc14]

Planes, Trains, and Automobiles 8/10. Would have made my 80s list.

[Stag Hunter]

Planes, Trains, and Automobiles 8/10. Would have made my 80s list.

I wish there was a "like" button, like there is on Facebook. Since there's not, I'll just tell you I agree. Very good choice.

[Mmmm Donuts]

I wish there was a "like" button, like there is on Facebook. Since there's not, I'll just tell you I agree. Very good choice.

Usually, if people like or agree with someone's post here, they'll click the "thumbs up" button.

[Stag Hunter]

Usually, if people like or agree with someone's post here, they'll click the "thumbs up" button.

Oh. Good to know.

[-KhaN-]

http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/media/2013/05/man-of-steel-posters-visuasys.jpg

Man of Steel

First of all I should start by saying I hate Superman out of all the major superheroes created. I do not see what the hype was with this movie (first time watching) the origin story was bland, the movie seemed to cut to his childhood every 5 seconds. The action sequences were good I guess but how long is it going to take to build Metropolis again? (I guess until Batman vs Superman comes out). I wont go into why I hate Superman as a hero (hint he can die by a rock from his own planet, but now his whole planet can kill him), I am not hyped for the next movie in the franchise at all! The only saving grace I thought was General Zod and his female commander they seemed interesting to me and she was a badass!

1.5/5 stars (only for the badguys)

...It was not great movie,don't take me wrong but 1.5 really???

[-KhaN-]

You're not alone. I thought it was pretty bad.

http://rack.3.mshcdn.com/media/ZgkyMDEzLzA2LzEyLzc3L0xlb25hcmRvRGljLjJkZmVmLmdpZgpwCXRodW1iCTEyMDB4OTYwMD4/7e5a92f5/328/Leonardo-Dicaprio.gif

How many of you is out there?Are you some kind of rebels?You are demanding less good movies? :D

[the samoan lawyer]

http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQAevBMO2xjg-ArrYXiU4kvcRUWNUcFT6WgOISbNNr5VCuQi-6BFhHKoW4 (http://www.google.co.uk/url?q=http://www.thestyleking.com/compass/style-kings/style-movie-blow-up/&sa=U&ei=TBTqUqzzDYSV0QWznoHADg&ved=0CEAQ9QEwCQ&sig2=Rw0A2wMB1ApmjnIoO6zIcw&usg=AFQjCNHdzXgs4uDtdqMhVgz65Ju3dGSfSQ)

Blow-up (1966)

Found this very slow and rather like the lead character himself, pretentious. I much prefer De Palma's Blow out and of course The Conversation. In fairness, i did enjoy the appearance of The Yardbirds and i thought the ending was pretty decent.

5.5/10

[PHANTELM]

Escape Plan - WATCHABLE

[Matteo]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/4c/LaNoiredeDVD.jpg

Black Girl (1966)

A seminal film in Senegalese cinema, this is a highly symbolic tale about African oppression and hardship against their imperial superiors. It is bleak film that unfortunately spawns too much of an implausible and contrived conclusion, and its running length is a bit too limited at a mere 55 minutes. In spite of this, however, it is great film that also works as an engaging character study, exploring the social role of Africans in contemporary, post-colonial France. Quite impressive. A 7.5 works here.

[RepentantSky]

One Missed Call (American version 2008) 4/5. The only real problem I had was that some of the acting wasn't on par with the Japanese version trilogy but beyond that, it was a pretty good horror film and I for one enjoyed it.

[Mmmm Donuts]

http://rack.3.mshcdn.com/media/ZgkyMDEzLzA2LzEyLzc3L0xlb25hcmRvRGljLjJkZmVmLmdpZgpwCXRodW1iCTEyMDB4OTYwMD4/7e5a92f5/328/Leonardo-Dicaprio.gif

How many of you is out there?Are you some kind of rebels?You are demanding less good movies? :D

Meh, taste is subjective. Whenever you're dealing with high art, each person is going to have a different opinion about it. It's no different here. Even though I love the movie, I can see why others won't.

BTW, whenever Shutter Island is brought up, I always feel the need to bring this up. IMO, one of the more underrated scenes in the movie, as well my favourite scene from it, besides the ending.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXY23gsHXXo

[-KhaN-]

http://i.imgur.com/XyrOR.gif

Yea,it was good scene,I was just joking with those gifs ,they can like or dislike whatever they want. :)

[Lucas]

on the topic of Shutter Island I think it is very good. Most of the film's criticism comes from the easily predictable "twist". But honestly I don't really think the movie is great because of it's narrative(which is still solid), but rather for the strong performances, it's dark atmosphere and just the film's entire mood as a whole. Definitely one of the more underrated Scorsese flicks honestly along with After Hours

http://31.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lse9ybCNwT1qj65ubo1_500.gif

[Cobpyth]

I agree. The film has a great atmosphere. I wouldn't put it on the same level as After Hours, but it's a film that is very interesting to watch, regardless of its twist. It's the mood, the performances and the underlying themes that make this film good, in my opinion.

[-KhaN-]

The Departed
http://theactionelite.com/site/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/the-departed-poster-7.jpg

How can someone dislike this movie because of actor who is in this for about 10 minutes?Good acting,wonderful story,well told,ending was good,atmosphere was good,you are on the edge whole time,you want to know what will happen next,what will their next move be.

VERDICT-8.8-10

[Pussy Galore]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/c1/ThingPoster.jpg/215px-ThingPoster.jpg

I was really disappointed. I had high expectations about this so called classic, but I thought the characters decisions were idiotic and that it was a forgettable film.

[Cobpyth]

Nymphomaniac Vol. 1 and 2 (2013)

http://www.habergazete.com/admin/plugins/elfinder/files/genel/ggggggggggg.jpg

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ardnipPDhFg/UunzN1oKdhI/AAAAAAAAQiM/okuuRMF9oAo/s1600/filmul%2Bnymphomaniac%2B2%2Bonline%2Binterzis%2Bcristina%2Bdochianu.jpg

This look inside the mind of a nymphomaniac is interesting, bold, artistically often satisfying and uncompromising. Apart from that, it's also quite entertaining to look at actually. The film has a serious tone, but there are also a few intended laughs in the form of dark humor.
The film is also VERY explicit. I personally didn't mind, but if you don't like watching male and female genitals on a screen, you should probably not watch this film.

I liked both parts equally well. The first volume is a little more laid back and works great as a build up to the second one, which is more brutal and poignant.

The film handles many (controversial) themes and sometimes makes a few questionable statements (or at least some characters do), in my opinion, but what else can you expect from Lars Von Trier? Most of the time he succeeds in staying focused and rational enough to keep the tale interesting.

It's a great addition to his already impressive filmography.

I'd rate both parts together 4(-).

[Stag Hunter]

Last night I viewed Punch-Drunk Love for the first time. I am delighted to experience a film with such subtlety. Paul Thomas Anderson is the Kubrick of our time. A wonderfully eccentric film with an interesting premise, Punch-Drunk Love is a movie focused on the delicacy rather than the absurdity. There aren’t many modern movies I have seen in which the dynamics of the characters are more or equally as important to the situation. Trainspotting, for example, is perfect at this sort of thing. This movie, however, is a subtle work of art. I would say masterpiece, but I like to wait at least three days and give myself time to think before I make a statement like that. Adam Sandler’s roll was superbly portrayed (as someone mentioned earlier, it was the perfect roll for him) and Emily Watson was amazing as usual. I think one of the reason Sandler performed as well as he did was due to the fact that he surrounded himself around some of the best actors. He had nowhere to go but up. This is a very good move for actors looking to improve their craft. Most actors surround themselves around poor actors, hoping the poor actors will make them look good by comparison. As for Paul Thomas Anderson’s directing style, there is nothing overly verbose in its execution. Like I said, he is the Kubrick of our time. Sure, Anderson’s not showing us wide angles or stately architecture, but he’s doing something much more effective. He follows the characters around and presents his art in a subtle way to where we forget we’re watching a movie. We become saturated in whatever we’re watching. My favorite shot is where Barry and Lena are walking away from the camera, the camera then makes a hole, while, in the background, Hawaiian music plays. What a cool shot! Does anyone else look for things like these? I just love those little touches! Another example, for instance, would be the opening scene. Again, this isn’t overly verbose in presentation, but still a very efficient and a very cool scene. The very first shot (what a shot!) is purely magical filmmaking. It shows Barry dressed in a blue suit sitting next to white and blue walls. It’s nothing much, but what a splendid act of talent it is! I’m rambling. My point is this: I love Paul Thomas Anderson!

[Sane]

Nymphomaniac Vol. 1 and 2 (2013)

http://www.habergazete.com/admin/plugins/elfinder/files/genel/ggggggggggg.jpg

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ardnipPDhFg/UunzN1oKdhI/AAAAAAAAQiM/okuuRMF9oAo/s1600/filmul%2Bnymphomaniac%2B2%2Bonline%2Binterzis%2Bcristina%2Bdochianu.jpg

This look inside the mind of a nymphomaniac is interesting, bold, artistically often satisfying and uncompromising. Apart from that, it's also quite entertaining to look at actually. The film has a serious tone, but there are also a few intended laughs in the form of dark humor.
The film is also VERY explicit. I personally didn't mind, but if you don't like watching male and female genitals on a screen, you should probably not watch this film.

I liked both parts equally well. The first volume is a little more laid back and works great as a build up to the second one, which is more brutal and poignant.

The film handles many (controversial) themes and sometimes makes a few questionable statements (or at least some characters do), in my opinion, but what else can you expect from Lars Von Trier? Most of the time he succeeds in staying focused and rational enough to keep the tale interesting.

It's a great addition to his already impressive filmography.

I'd rate both parts together 4(-).
Nice review. I love Von Trier but wasn't particularly looking forward to seeing this but now I am :)

[Cobpyth]

@Stag Hunter: Very glad to see another passionate fan of PTA. He is indeed one of the most talented filmmakers working today, if not THE most talented. He is in total control of his craft.

:up:

[Lucas]

@Stag Hunter, glad you loved Punch-Drunk Love. When i initially viewed it I wasn't expecting it to be nearly as good as it was.Imo its close to a masterpiece for me.The visual style was beautiful, and the music choice was fantastic as well. I can see the Kubrick comparisons. Boogie Nights was PTA doing Scorsese, and this was PTA arguably attempting Kubrick.He was triumphant both times.

[Guaporense]

The Hedgehog (2009)

http://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/Le_Herisson.jpg

73/100

Solid film nominated by Wintertriangles.

[The Sci-Fi Slob]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/c1/ThingPoster.jpg/215px-ThingPoster.jpg

I was really disappointed. I had high expectations about this so called classic, but I thought the characters decisions were idiotic and that it was a forgettable film.

http://i.imgur.com/rc12E.gif Are you sure you've got the correct image?

[Stag Hunter]

@Stag Hunter: Very glad to see another passionate fan of PTA. He is indeed one of the most talented filmmakers working today, if not THE most talented. He is in total control of his craft.

:up:

@Stag Hunter, glad you loved Punch-Drunk Love. When i initially viewed it I wasn't expecting it to be nearly as good as it was.Imo its close to a masterpiece for me.The visual style was beautiful, and the music choice was fantastic as well. I can see the Kubrick comparisons. Boogie Nights was PTA doing Scorsese, and this was PTA arguably attempting Kubrick.He was triumphant both times.

I am very glad to know that other individuals pay attention to the small details. This is the type of thing that makes movies great, in my view.

[Lucas]

Lawrence of Arabia-4. I think this is a great film,but I viewed it on my labtop. I feel this is a film meant to be seen on TV, or the movie theater. Would love to rewatch it again one day. It is epic in scale.

http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BMzAwMjM4NzA2OV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMDI0NzAwMQ%40%40._V1_SY317_CR1,0,214,317_.jpg

[Mr Minio]

I was really disappointed. I had high expectations about this so called classic, but I thought the characters decisions were idiotic and that it was a forgettable film. I really hope you accidentally saw remake.

[Lucas]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/c1/ThingPoster.jpg/215px-ThingPoster.jpg

I was really disappointed. I had high expectations about this so called classic, but I thought the characters decisions were idiotic and that it was a forgettable film.

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ls88vp6lp51r3lx5ao1_400.gif

I didn't even think it was possible to not like The Thing. Movie is badass to the max.

[rauldc14]

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ls88vp6lp51r3lx5ao1_400.gif

I didn't even think it was possible to not like The Thing. Movie is badass to the max.

Good but slightly overrated.

I watched The Elephant Man. It's a good film, and an interesting concept based off a true character. I'd call it Lynch's best for me to this point, though I've only seen three of his.

7.5/10

[Plan B]

Lone Survivor (2013)

4

http://a2.mzstatic.com/us/r30/Video1/v4/01/a4/74/01a474d8-3509-f064-5527-bdfb67356e28/05685_MLNA_LoneSurvivorTemp_1400x2100.jpg

[cricket]

Bad Taste 3

I still enjoyed it but not as much as when it came out. I can't figure out why I like this, yet hate Dead Alive.

[BlueLion]

http://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/Serpico.jpg

Serpico (1973) - 4

I f*cking love 70s Al Pacino.

[Pussy Galore]

What's so good about it? I really think that the characters are stupid and that the way they organise themselves was dumb. Yeah it's visually well done, but I found it cliché and forgettable. (talking about the thing haha)

[the samoan lawyer]

Just a couple of shorts:
http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQYmNZNTtCk0KiTxAMFUpES1mxoduk02jjg1R1t3IB2obR81p1se_A1R4U (http://www.google.co.uk/url?q=http://letterboxd.com/martinrj/list/live-action-short-films-appropriate-for-children/&sa=U&ei=t5nrUq7FOqW47QazsoGoBQ&ved=0CDAQ9QEwAQ&sig2=4JccSCdzljB12zwrbfL_RA&usg=AFQjCNGW-vgnWE4hxLszIPnAJwt2DSJDlQ)
Bedhead by Robert Rodriguez - 8/10

http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSqEz0lDSPBAlcRSwZsk4OBCrlcKchT-iKGCSwVkypmD1duy6uPgk-kiw (http://www.google.co.uk/url?q=http://www.jmvideo.fr/article-610-the-big-shave--1967--martin-scorsese.html&sa=U&ei=8pnrUq6aN6Ss7Qa0q4DQDw&ved=0CEYQ9QEwDA&sig2=ZdJfMRrS70UZuOYcjIAXMA&usg=AFQjCNFDGwflAWyJn-UnXDe78hn3zlFWEw)
The Big Shave by Matin Scorsese - 8.5/10

http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSWVxc7w91wOdQ3phm4S4OWAHaWH3td1JhH46gvn3q4xdG3ZdZKkQJUp0c (http://www.google.co.uk/url?q=http://pixar.wikia.com/The_Adventures_of_Andr%25C3%25A9_and_Wally_B.&sa=U&ei=LJrrUvmcOI2BhAf4mYDIDQ&ved=0CDQQ9QEwAw&sig2=rWTLMbdgZB8RdYs_uXhDLg&usg=AFQjCNFwUdjqRMNhrjeFzxtxIWqGIGa5tg)
The Adventures of Andre and Wally B. by Pixar - 8/10

Really enjoyed all these, especially The Big Shave, loved the use of music in it.

[The Gunslinger45]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/d6/Tropic_thunder_ver3.jpg

5

Still hilarious!

[Guaporense]

Sex Lies and Videotape (1989)
http://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/sex_lies_and_videotape.jpg

Another winner from the MoFo Hall of Fame. Movies nominated there tend to be good and I didn't expect this movie to be so good. I also read that it won the golden palm it's a well deserved win.

75/100

[Guaporense]

Still hilarious!

Tropic Thunder f*ck yeah!

[-KhaN-]

12 Years a Slave
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/sites/default/files/2013/10/12_years_a_slave_soundtrack.jpg
It was good movie,it had good story telling,good acting,you get involved,you care about characters,not my type of movie but I still enjoyed,I recommend it.

VERDICT:8.7/10

[BlueLion]

http://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/Crash_2005.jpg

Crash (2005) - 1.5

This was so bad that MoFo shouldn't even acknowledge it as a Best Picture winner. After he completes the new design of the website and launches it officially, Yoda should just remove it from the Oscar winners list altogether.

[Lucas]

M

http://s3.amazonaws.com/criterion-production/release_boxshots/281-eb819eb01e1c3ca02f3b9d6c0eaa3b74/30_box_348x490_original.jpg

4. Classic thriller, it drags a bit in some areas but overall this is a revolutionary film and extremely influential. I can see DNA from this film in Fincher,Nolan and many other directors. If you are a fan of thrillers,definitely recommended.

[Guaporense]

http://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/Crash_2005.jpg

Crash (2005) - 1.5

This was so bad that MoFo shouldn't even acknowledge it as a Best Picture winner. After he completes the new design of the website and launches it officially, Yoda should just remove it from the Oscar winners list altogether.

I liked it. It's a funny movie.

[Pussy Galore]

High Noon 4 Great western! It showed how a man can follow his convictions and get away with it

[The Sci-Fi Slob]

I liked it. It's a funny movie.

Crystal Meth is bad for you. You should quit now!

[Pussy Galore]

What is that bad about Crash? I don't think it's Oscar worthy, but it's not bad

[Guaporense]

It's extremely heavy handed so people who cannot "handle" it think it's cr*p.

[Lucas]

What is that bad about Crash? I don't think it's Oscar worthy, but it's not bad

It's very heavy-handed "oscar-bait". I for one dont hate it, I think its average but it is one of the worst best picture winners ever, no doubt about that.

[Guaporense]

Crystal Meth is bad for you. You should quit now!

Best part of Crash was when one of the black characters said something with that substance: "Buses have big windows so that the poor black people who ride the bus can be seem and mocked by the people outside of it."

[Pussy Galore]

It's very heavy-handed "oscar-bait". I for one dont hate it, I think its average but it is one of the worst best picture winners ever, no doubt about that.

The King Speech, Gladiator, Driving Miss Daisy (good movie, but look what it's agains't), Chicago, Argo

I said them without watching the list and they are all worst then Crash to me

[Guaporense]

Gladiator is a masterpiece and the best movie to ever win best picture Oscar! :D

[The Sci-Fi Slob]

Best part of Crash was when one of the black characters said something with that substance: "Buses have big windows so that the poor black people who ride the bus can be seem and mocked by the people outside of it."

If only Jews were black, then they'd have something else to moan about, and kill whoever they want to as a result.....

[Lucas]

Gladiator is a masterpiece and the best movie to ever win best picture Oscar! :D

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-0a3fg-fUWdw/T3On8vGgmVI/AAAAAAAAA4A/PJg-1gRMH5Y/s1600/bunk-the-wire.gif

I really like Gladiator, but its definitely not the greatest film ever to win best picture. The Godfather,Godfather Part 2,Lawrence of Arabia,Casablanca are much better.

[Pussy Galore]

I guess I need to rewatch Gladiator, but I remember hating it

[BlueLion]

It's extremely heavy handed so people who cannot "handle" it think it's cr*p.

I didn't think it's crap mainly because it is extremely heavy handed (although it is one of the reasons). The main reason why I think it's not only one of the worst Best Picture winners, but also one of the worst films of the last decade, is because it treats the viewer like an idiot. The film is way too preachy to be taken seriously and its message is repeatedly pummeled over your head. Crash insulted my intelligence.

I agree that it's funny though, the scene where the girl doesn't actually get shot is actually hilarious.

[The Gunslinger45]

http://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/Crash_2005.jpg

Crash (2005) - 1.5

This was so bad that MoFo shouldn't even acknowledge it as a Best Picture winner. After he completes the new design of the website and launches it officially, Yoda should just remove it from the Oscar winners list altogether.

Crash, or as I call it, "White Guilt: The Movie." The definition of Oscar Bait. And the Academy took it hook line and sinker.

[Guaporense]

I really like Gladiator, but its definitely not the greatest film ever to win best picture. The Godfather,Godfather Part 2,Lawrence of Arabia,Casablanca are much better.

Lawrence of Arabia and The Godfather parts I and II are great but I think that Gladiator is still slightly better than these.

I didn't like Casablanca. Found the characters to be extremely forced. Just my initial impression. I may watch it again sometime, maybe that time I may get it.

[Guaporense]

I didn't think it's crap mainly because it is extremely heavy handed (although it is one of the reasons). The main reason why I think it's not only one of the worst Best Picture winners, but also one of the worst films of the last decade, is because it treats the viewer like an idiot. The film is way too preachy to be taken seriously and its message is repeatedly pummeled over your head. Crash insulted my intelligence.

If I didn't like films that insulted my intelligence I wouldn't like almost anything.

I agree that it's funny though, the scene where the girl doesn't actually get shot is actually hilarious.

My heart was torn apart at that scene. :D

[BlueLion]

My heart was torn apart at that scene. :D

either

a) you're joking

or

b) you were 13 (or younger) when you watched it

[Guaporense]

I was 16 when I watched it in 2005.:D Maybe not torn apart but I was scared for her.

You people need to be still able to grasp the less pretentious stuff besides being able to get the more sophisticated movies. I love Satantango and Schindler's List at the same time and Schindler's List is almost as manipulative as Crash.

[Frightened Inmate No. 2]

crash is some of the most well-done manipulation i've seen (seem).

[rauldc14]

Crash is a great film to me. Haters gonna hate.

[wintertriangles]

Haters gonna hate.Really useless throwaway response, not even sure how it applies here. Crash is widely detested, no one hates it because it's popular.

[rauldc14]

It's a good film in my opinion, which is all that matters to me.

[Pussy Galore]

Hiroshima, mon amour
]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/98/Hiroshima_Mon_Amour_1959.jpg/220px-Hiroshima_Mon_Amour_1959.jpg

The 1st scene is fantastic, intelligent, brilliant honestly I thought thr movie was going to be a new favorite of mine, but after it the movie take a melodramatic twist and I liked it less. Nonetheless it's a beautiful film and I'd suggest it to a fan of melodrama

[Matteo]

Hiroshima, mon amour
]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/98/Hiroshima_Mon_Amour_1959.jpg/220px-Hiroshima_Mon_Amour_1959.jpg

The 1st scene is fantastic, intelligent, brilliant honestly I thought thr movie was going to be a new favorite of mine, but after it the movie take a melodramatic twist and I liked it less. Nonetheless it's a beautiful film and I'd suggest it to a fan of melodrama

Wait until you watch Last Year at Marienbad.

[Pussy Galore]

The dialogue is definitely intelligent, but I find the '' love hurts me '' melodrama pretty pointless.

I'd be interested in seing Last Year at Marienbad!

[Guaporense]

I found Last Year at Marienbad extremely artsy but extremely boring. Left me ice cold in the end.

The Swimmer (1968)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/42/The_Swimmer_poster.jpg/225px-The_Swimmer_poster.jpg

Not my type of movie. I found it relatively uninteresting and it did not hold my attention for it's entire duration so I couldn't make much sense of it. It appears to be an allegorical character study of some form where the main character embarks on an epic journey throughout the county. Maybe a criticism of the upper and upper middle class American society during the extremely prosperous years of the late 1960's. My rating, 56/100. (give it 66/100 if you like middle aged men :D)

[Cobpyth]

The Swimmer (1968)

Not my type of movie. I found it relatively uninteresting and it did not hold my attention for it's entire duration so I couldn't make much sense of it. It appears to be an allegorical character study of some form where the main character embarks on an epic journey throughout the county. Maybe a criticism of the upper and upper middle class American society during the extremely prosperous years of the late 1960's. My rating, 56/100. (give it 66/100 if you like middle aged men :D)

It's a pity you couldn't get into it, Guap. It's as much a satire of the untruthfulness of the American upper class as it is a brilliantly tragic character study, in my opinion. I related very strongly to it. I guess that wasn't the case with you.

[Guaporense]

Yeah. I don't quite get this genre of arthouse american cinema.

[cricket]

I found Last Year at Marienbad extremely artsy but extremely boring. Left me ice cold in the end.

The Swimmer (1968)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/42/The_Swimmer_poster.jpg/225px-The_Swimmer_poster.jpg

Not my type of movie. I found it relatively uninteresting and it did not hold my attention for it's entire duration so I couldn't make much sense of it. It appears to be an allegorical character study of some form where the main character embarks on an epic journey throughout the county. Maybe a criticism of the upper and upper middle class American society during the extremely prosperous years of the late 1960's. My rating, 56/100. (give it 66/100 if you like middle aged men :D)

I never heard of this before but just looked it up and it sounds interesting to me. I have been drawn lately to slower paced, character driven films, kind of like The Wrestler. I know it's a different story, but is it a similar type of film?

[Matteo]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/29/Investigation_of_a_Citizen_Above_Suspicion_Poster.jpg/220px-Investigation_of_a_Citizen_Above_Suspicion_Poster.jpg

Investigation of a Citizen Above Suspicion (1970, Elio Petri)

A biting and stark political satire that examines the dysfunctionality of bureaucrats in Italian public office whilst also proving to be an adroit derision of the banal and reckless men in Southern Italy's homicide division. It unfortunately fragments in its last couple of acts by getting a bit too unrestrained as the film drifted away and ultimately lost focus, but it is a very well-written slice of burlesque with a captivating performance by Gian Maria Volonté and a tuneful score by the great Ennio Morricone. Maybe a 7 or a 7.5.

[Iroquois]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/fb/A_Perfect_World.jpg

A Perfect World -4

[Guaporense]

I never heard of this before but just looked it up and it sounds interesting to me. I have been drawn lately to slower paced, character driven films, kind of like The Wrestler. I know it's a different story, but is it a similar type of film?

They are very different: The Wrestler is a rational movie with clearly defined character arc while The Swimmer is an allegorical art film that takes place during a single day and the protagonist is an upper class American who was swimming in his neighbor's swimming pool. It's not exactly a character driven film.

[Cobpyth]

I never heard of this before but just looked it up and it sounds interesting to me. I have been drawn lately to slower paced, character driven films, kind of like The Wrestler. I know it's a different story, but is it a similar type of film?

It's not exactly The Wrestler, but I think you certainly might enjoy it if you watch it with an open mind and are prepared to truly reflect on what you're seeing.

@Guap: 'The single day' symbolizes a whole life, though, so I don't think the amount of time that the movie portrays, is a big issue here.
The Swimmer is definitely a character driven movie, by the way. What else would you call it?

[-KhaN-]

http://www.impawards.com/2001/posters/enemy_at_the_gates_ver1.jpg

Enemy at the gates
VERDICT:7/10

[Lucas]

http://awesomenator.com/content/2011/04/the-killing.jpg
The Killing-This is some damn good noir, and another great Kubrick film. This heist film is engaging,well-shot and very tense as well. Easy 4, its a great film. Crime certainly does not pay here.

[Mmmm Donuts]

Is there anything the Great Stanley Kubrick CAN'T do???

"Hmmm, I guess it's about time to direct a horror movie. Better make it one the greatest horror films of all time, just to be on the safe side."

[Pussy Galore]

That's right, all of Kubrick's filmography is different and all of is movies can be consider a masterpiece.

[jiraffejustin]

Is there anything the Great Stanley Kubrick CAN'T do???


Make another movie. :(:(:(:(:(:(

[Lucas]

Is there anything the Great Stanley Kubrick CAN'T do???

"Hmmm, I guess it's about time to direct a horror movie. Better make it one the greatest horror films of all time, just to be on the safe side."

To answer your question there is indeed nothing Kubrick couldn't do.

http://24.media.tumblr.com/dc8512db23d8f032e0e08fc9c8520244/tumblr_mt88ucU5rX1ss5rhzo1_500.gif

[Lucas]

Eyes Wide Shut is a masterpiece mannnn.

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lof3zsog061qeuiujo1_500.gif

[wintertriangles]

That's right, all of Kubrick's filmography is different and all of is movies can be consider a masterpiece.Except The Killer's Kiss. Just sayin.

[Guaporense]

Is there anything the Great Stanley Kubrick CAN'T do???

Bad movies?

[Pussy Galore]

Except The Killer's Kiss. Just sayin.

I haven't seen that, but yeah you're probably right

[jiraffejustin]

Except The Killer's Kiss. Just sayin.

That chase sequence is a masterpiece though.

[Guaporense]

The Swimmer is definitely a character driven movie, by the way. What else would you call it?

Art movie.

[Cobpyth]

Art movie.

And art movies can't be character driven? You know that's not true (I hope). ;)

[Guaporense]

Well, that's a hard thing to say. A pure art film is a movie that doesn't have any sense of narrative so I don't think you can have character development there.

The swimmer is not a pure art film but it is not exactly what I would call a character driven movie (like, Goodfellas is more of a character driven movie, with it's memorable and well developed cast of characters). Although that depends on your definition of "character driven movie".

[bluedeed]

What a loaded phrase, art film! It seems meaningless to me

[Pussy Galore]

Johnny Guitar
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/7b/Johnny_guitar.jpg/220px-Johnny_guitar.jpg
4 I love western, it's a really good and original one !

[-KhaN-]

Prometheus
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/4c/Prometheus_album_cover_art.jpeg
I enjoyed it,it was very interesting,if someone says that it is just set up in Alien universe and nothing else that is just stupid.Acting is good,for me story was good,they made nice connection to Alien,I hate when they say "it is just normal horror in space" ummm so Alien is also just mediocre normal movie?I just find it very interesting,I wanted to see what will happen,ending is cool.Why are people bitching about unanswered question,Alien had so many of them also but nooooo you heard that is a classic so it is fine in that case...I'm not saying Alien is bad movie far from that,but they had same amount of unanswered questions,nobody mentioned it in Alien.This is not spin-off,they say it is not prequel then what is it?It had so many connections with Alien you can't ignore some parts...Some kind of origin story?If they make second movie they can turn this into prequels and I would love to see that.I love mystery part of the movie,it gets you involved,everyone is having their personality,they are just normal group of people,they were not ready for this.It had nice build up,some intense moments,if Alien had a bit faster build up,something like this,I would honestly enjoy it much more.Engineers obviously had a plan to come to Earth with that ship so second part?It is having really good potential for part two.I like atmosphere of the movie,I never got bored.One more important thing,if you don't understand something it doesn't mean it is a plot hole...One fast definition of plot hole,plot hole happens when something that is happening is going against something that already happened in past,that is never going on in this movie,if something is left out that is not plot hole!

VERDICT:8.5/10

[mark f]

Calling The Swimmer an "art movie" is meaningless and wrong. Discuss and describe the movie without using lazy, bogus shorthand. Otherwise American movies were crammed with "art movies" from 1966 to 1973, so you'd have to differentiate them some other way anyhow.

[Guaporense]

Prometheus is better than Alien 4 at least. And the Alien vs Predator movies as well. It's weaker than the first three Alien movies, including Alien 3 (that goes without saying, though).

[Guaporense]

Calling The Swimmer an "art film" is meaningless and wrong. Discuss and describe the movie without using lazy, bogus shorthand.

Calm down a little. I am free to write in any way shape or form, since this is a free forum.

The simple fact is that The Swimmer is not remotely the same type of film as The Wrestler and that should be obvious to you as well.

[Cobpyth]

Calm down a little. I am free to write in any way shape or form, since this is a free forum.

Anime is a genre.

[jiraffejustin]

Keep trollin' trollin' trollin'. Keep trollin' trollin' trollin'.

[Cobpyth]

But serious now, Guap:

You weren't really answering the question and were using rather 'wrong' vocabulary to substantiate your statement that The Swimmer is not a character driven film. That's why Mark and Bluedeed were correcting you, just like you correct people when they say anime is a genre. It's rather inappropiate to tell them to calm down then, especially coming from you, as you do stuff like that all the time. ;)

[Guaporense]

I wrote calm down for the obvious reason that he was obviously angry and expressing aggression when he wrote that post.

Let's see wikipedia's definition of art film:

"An art film (also known as art movie, specialty film, art house film, or in the collective sense as art cinema) is typically a serious, independent film aimed at a niche market rather than a mass market audience.[1] An art film is "intended to be a serious artistic work, often experimental and not designed for mass appeal";[2] they are "made primarily for aesthetic reasons rather than commercial profit",[3] and they contain "unconventional or highly symbolic content."[4]

Film critics and film studies scholars typically define an "art film" using a "...canon of films and those formal qualities that mark them as different from mainstream Hollywood films",[5] which includes, among other elements: a social realism style; an emphasis on the authorial expressiveness of the director; and a focus on the thoughts and dreams of characters, rather than presenting a clear, goal-driven story. Film scholar David Bordwell claims that "art cinema itself is a film genre, with its own distinct conventions."[6]"

The Swimmer is very clearly that genre of movie. And calling it an Art Film is not wrong and conveys important information regarding the contents of the movie. Someone who doesn't like art movies will probably not like The Swimmer.

Calling anime as a genre is a much more strong claim it's like calling Hollywood is a genre. Correction is required in that aspect. I don't think that there is any justification for the aggressive way that they behaved toward my labeling of The Swimmer as an art film, even if I were wrong in doing so (which apparently, I am not).

[-KhaN-]

Prometheus is better than Alien 4 at least. And the Alien vs Predator movies as well. It's weaker than the first three Alien movies, including Alien 3 (that goes without saying, though).

This is a lot better than Alien 3...And I obviously rated this better than Alien so...I did enjoy it more than Alien...It is your opinion.

[Cobpyth]

I wrote calm down for the obvious reason that he was obviously angry and expressing aggression when he wrote that post.

No he wasn't. I saw you acting WAY more agressive quite often while defending certain statements about anime. You're being a bit of a hypocrite here, sorry.

[Cobpyth]

The Swimmer is very clearly that genre of movie. And calling it an Art Film is not wrong and conveys important information regarding the contents of the movie. Someone who doesn't like art movies will probably not like The Swimmer.

Yes, but you were using it as an argument against the fact that it is NOT a character driven movie, which are two COMPLETELY different kinds of categorization. Just like anime and drama are for example two totally different kinds of categorization.

[Matteo]

I wrote calm down for the obvious reason that he was obviously angry and expressing aggression when he wrote that post.

Let's see wikipedia's definition of art film:

"An art film (also known as art movie, specialty film, art house film, or in the collective sense as art cinema) is typically a serious, independent film aimed at a niche market rather than a mass market audience.[1] An art film is "intended to be a serious artistic work, often experimental and not designed for mass appeal";[2] they are "made primarily for aesthetic reasons rather than commercial profit",[3] and they contain "unconventional or highly symbolic content."[4]

Film critics and film studies scholars typically define an "art film" using a "...canon of films and those formal qualities that mark them as different from mainstream Hollywood films",[5] which includes, among other elements: a social realism style; an emphasis on the authorial expressiveness of the director; and a focus on the thoughts and dreams of characters, rather than presenting a clear, goal-driven story. Film scholar David Bordwell claims that "art cinema itself is a film genre, with its own distinct conventions."[6]"

The Swimmer is very clearly that genre of movie. And calling it an Art Film is not wrong and conveys important information regarding the contents of the movie. Someone who doesn't like art movies will probably not like The Swimmer.

Calling anime as a genre is a much more strong claim it's like calling Hollywood is a genre. Correction is required in that aspect. I don't think that there is any justification for the aggressive way that they behaved toward my labeling of The Swimmer as an art film, even if I were wrong in doing so (which apparently, I am not).

Interesting post, although I certainly can not agree with this Bordwell. Art films are not a genre since there is nothing truly stylistic distinctive about them, other than the fact that they do appeal to a niche audience and are more aesthetically personal than the conventional piece. But that is not actually stylistic as art films do not follow a strict pattern of 'accustomed' conventions like, say, science fiction or horror. They are simple genre films (most of the time), albeit more unconventional and personalised (2001 is a perfect example of this). Then again, it can sometimes be like postmodern film to a degree, which is more 'self-aware' and does not confine its content to one genre (i.e., Barton Fink).

[mark f]

The problems with Wikipedia, Guapopedia, and generalizations in general are that some of the most popular films of the late '60s/early '70s - The Pawnbroker, Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, The Graduate, Bonnie and Clyde, 2001, Easy Rider, Butch Cassidy, Midnight Cowboy, Five Easy Pieces, A Clockwork Orange, The Last Picture Show, Cabaret - are thus technically "art movies". But they were all hits, unlike the aforementioned, dreaded The Swimmer, so therefore reliance on a broad definition is lazy and what I said the first time and without anger. :)

[bluedeed]

Interesting post, although I certainly can not agree with this Bordwell.

I don't agree with this Bordwell on this as well. He does, however, run the best film blog on the internet by a significant margin! Check it out sometime, it's the most consistently insightful writing on film I'm aware of.

http://www.davidbordwell.net/blog/

[Mr Minio]

A pure art film is a movie that doesn't have any sense of narrative so I don't think you can have character development there.

http://thegboatdotnet.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/8p10n.gif%3Fw%3D479

[Guaporense]

Yes, but you were using it as an argument against the fact that it is NOT a character driven movie, which are two COMPLETELY different kinds of categorization. Just like anime and drama are for example two totally different kinds of categorization.

Okay. I was wrong. We can have a character driven art film. And yes, art film is not a very well developed term so the line between a conventional movie and an art film is not actually defined so I understand Blueeded concern regarding the use of the term.

Still, it's obvious that The Wrestler and The Swimmer are very different kinds of movies.

[cricket]

Rush 3.5

Very good movie but I was still hoping it'd be better. Thor was very good in this, as was the rest of the cast.

[BlueLion]

http://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/Cries_and_Whispers.jpg

Cries and Whispers (1972) - 3.5

Bergman's version of hell.

[Guaporense]

Urga (1991)

http://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/Urga.jpg

60/100

It's an good movie that I personally did not find particularly interesting. It's a very bucolic film that tries to have a dense atmosphere but I found it too meandering and given it's super thin plot, it's aesthetics did not compensate fully well (I mean, Stalker has a super think plot in a sense, but it's aesthetic qualities are amazing so it's a masterpiece), this, not really. Also, this film appears to have as main theme the contrast between the bucolic and primitive lives of the Mongolia tribesmen and the modern industrialized world (usually, it appeared to me to be a rather favorable to the primitive livestyle of the Mongolians, as usual).

It remembers me a little about Dersu Uzala, but that's a masterpiece about friendship of the greatest master of cinema.

[McConnaughay]

It has been a while but not because lack-of activity on my part, here's the movies that I have watched since my last visit:
The Hunters - The flick had Alexa Vega in it, but it was a TV-movie, which is basically what Vega has been reduced to since Spy Kids kicked the bucket. I don't know if that's a good or bad thing, she isn't a great actor, but I've always enjoyed her, and in this movie, it's basically where she's comfortable. The movie wasn't anything special, cheaply made, cheaply thought-out with a little extra style. 5.0/10.0

The Aviator - I loved everything about it, Leonardo DiCaprio did tremendous in his role, and I really related to the character a lot. The bizarre compulsions to do things that others can make sense out of, and while, mine isn't nearly as heavy, (I've never washed my hands to the point that they bleed) I can appreciate it a lot. That's not the only thing, the movie was also impeccably entertaining, it's very long, and I think it might have waned in the third-quarter, but it finished itself nicely. 8.5/10.0

Bangkok Dangerous - Nicholas Cage isn't a bad actor, but I haven't enjoyed a movie from him that wasn't National Treasure 2, and that's not even an amazing movie. His narrations were enjoyable at first, giving off this idea that he's a "cold assassin that is accustom to being alone," but the problem is that within seconds after, he was not alone and everything resolved itself like a corny ABC movie. 4.0/10.0

Bourne Identity - I have been putting off watching this movie for the longest times, but I have to say that I actually enjoyed myself for what it was. It wasn't a great movie, but Matt Damon played his role well, and while it was ultimately a cookie-cutter action-flick, the interesting premise was enough to add a little novelty to it all. 7.0/10.0

Gamer - I was expecting to hate this movie, and with good reason, a lot of people talked about how much of an amazing disappointment that it was. However, I finished the movie with a smile on my face. Michael C. Hall did tremendous in this role, I love him as Dexter, but this was something bizarrely psychotic in an entirely different way. The "Under my Skin" bit was enough to get an approval rating from me. However, I also enjoyed the premise and some of the action scenes, there was a little too much vulgarity and stupidity in it, and that's what kept it from being a great movie, because it just felt unneeded and forced. 6.9/10.0

[Lucas]

The Kid-4.

http://www.cinemacom.com/chaplin/kid-gr.jpg

[McConnaughay]

Interesting post, although I certainly can not agree with this Bordwell. Art films are not a genre since there is nothing truly stylistic distinctive about them, other than the fact that they do appeal to a niche audience and are more aesthetically personal than the conventional piece. But that is not actually stylistic as art films do not follow a strict pattern of 'accustomed' conventions like, say, science fiction or horror. They are simple genre films (most of the time), albeit more unconventional and personalised (2001 is a perfect example of this). Then again, it can sometimes be like postmodern film to a degree, which is more 'self-aware' and does not confine its content to one genre (i.e., Barton Fink).
I think I can see his point. Art is not a genre, but I can see how an "Arthouse" film can be called as one, generally, I use that phrase to describe Oscar-bait.

[Frightened Inmate No. 2]

how many arthouse movies do you know that have won oscars?

[McConnaughay]

how many arthouse movies do you know that have won oscars?
Well, considering that I was speaking about a self-defined use of the word, I could say EVERY film that won was an arthouse film, and I'd be in the right. They aren't, but I never agreed with any other definition other than my own, however, just looking at them, The Artist and The King's Speech are about what I'd describe as films going out of their way to look artistic. I am not saying that they're bad, but when I see them, I think this is an "artsy" movie.

[-KhaN-]

Strangers on a Train
http://calibermag.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Strangers-on-a-train1.jpg
Not one of best movies but still good enough.If this is one of worse movies he created then others are...wonderful?

VERDICT:7.5/10

[Bellacoke]

Just watched Last Vegas, what a fun movie those guys are still kicking it.

I will give it 7/10

[M+F Reviews]

I watched I'm Not There earlier today. Very interesting and was put together in a very fresh and intelligent way. Enjoyed it a lot.

7/10

[Lucas]

Through a glass darkly-3. Bergman films are always technically sound,well acted and honest. But there's always this chill that permeates throughout his movies that keeps me from connecting with them emotionally. From what I've seen from him Persona is my favorite.

http://s3.amazonaws.com/filmeurope/movies/735/posters/original/Jako%20v%20zrcadle.jpg

[The Gunslinger45]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/0/0f/Priscilla_the_Queen.jpg

4

[s1n1st3r]

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/--MnQjRfLqEc/TZNaCGEFDOI/AAAAAAAAARI/1xHtfz--e_A/s1600/the%2Bfighter.jpg

The Fighter

Watched this on the weekend for the first time, I enjoyed this movie and I understand it had some critical acclaim behind it (actors wise). I was a bit confused at the start however I thought it was a movie about Christian Bales character and a come back until the story unfold into what that was about. Mark Whalberg I thought acted well but was overshadowed by Bale and Adams (which acted superbly). It is no Rocky or Warrior but still a decent story/true story to watch. It seemed more about drug abuse than boxing I thought.

3.5/5 Stars

[Lucas]

The Maltese Falcon-3.5+

http://nighthawknews.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/maltese-falcon-by-content-artofmanlinessdotcomw499h371.jpg

[Pussy Galore]

The Hill

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/6/6b/Hill_movieposter.jpg/220px-Hill_movieposter.jpg

8.5/10 Great movie about WW2 and how we ca forget our common sens when we always follow orders

[BlueLion]

http://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/The_Wolf_of_Wall_Street.jpg

The Wolf of Wall Street (2013) - 4.5

He creates masterworks like Goodfellas and Taxi Driver, and he is able to produce a film like this in his 70s. If you don't like Scorsese, I hope you spend the rest of your life shining shoes.

[The Gunslinger45]

http://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/The_Wolf_of_Wall_Street.jpg

The Wolf of Wall Street (2013) - 4.5

He creates masterworks like Goodfellas and Taxi Driver, and he is able to produce a film like this in his 70s. If you don't like Scorsese, I hope you spend the rest of your life shining shoes.

Glad ya liked it!

[Swan]

http://img.thesun.co.uk/aidemitlum/archive/00462/shoeshine_682_462657a.jpg

[bluedeed]

Making good films in your 70s is an accomplishment? Then what does that make Manoel de Oliveria?
http://media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/62/0a/3d/620a3d245a902aea5978fee8c1c9758e.jpg

[BlueLion]

Who the f*ck is Manoel de Oliveria

[Guaporense]

Through a glass darkly-3. Bergman films are always technically sound,well acted and honest. But there's always this chill that permeates throughout his movies that keeps me from connecting with them emotionally. From what I've seen from him Persona is my favorite.

Persona is a very aggressive movie, a movie with a stronger sense of theatricality than his other movies. His other movies are more subtle and I liked Persona more than his others (with the also very aggressive, Cries and Whispers, both in my top 100 favorites).

Try watching Virgin Spring. It's also a very aggressive movie by Bergman, featuring a rape kill scene even.

[bluedeed]

You could at least google it. He's a 105 year old Portuguese filmmaker whose made 8 films in the past 10 years. Basically, he can be thought of the world's only remaining silent filmmaker. His films should be judged in their own regard though, the one's I've seen are great.

[Guaporense]

I never watched a film of his, I may try sometime.

[Matteo]

de Oliveira is immortal.

[Proximity]

SUNSET BLVD (WILDER)
4.5

[McConnaughay]

You could at least google it. He's a 105 year old Portuguese filmmaker whose made 8 films in the past 10 years. Basically, he can be thought of the world's only remaining silent filmmaker. His films should be judged in their own regard though, the one's I've seen are great.
I looked him up, never heard of anything that he's ever done, but considering that he isn't very popular in the States, I am none too surprised. However, it is certainly a feat to be actively making movies at that age.

[RepentantSky]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f3/Woman_in_black_ver4.jpg

The Woman in Black, 3/5. It isn't as horrible as I thought it would be but it did have a few problems. Most notably were the long times of silence and the obvious to come jump scares. Also, I kind of wanted to know exactly why what the characters did to stop the woman in black didn't work and, if anything would. Seemed a bit unresolved. The scares were there, but they weren't as good as they should have been the story was a bit weak. Also, it was kind of a happy ending even though it wasn't, and that was kind of odd. Overall it was alright but it could have and should have been better because the acting, when they allowed it to happen was great.

[teljesfilmek]

"Capote" with Philip Seymour Hoffman : 7/10

Gattaca : 8/10

[-KhaN-]

El Mariachi
http://collider.com/wp-content/uploads/el-mariachi-poster.jpg
Action flick,had a good time with it,don't watch this if you want deep story.Good decant movie.

VERDICT:7/10

[the samoan lawyer]

http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS73Y6Y_pEq2ybhMWEl50WJ-ETtdeh97O-71nYNBK5w5T9W1RAo_hMVhQiM (http://www.google.co.uk/url?q=http://www.graceumcniles.org/templates/default.asp%3Fid%3D56486%26PID%3D957225&sa=U&ei=523vUqKVJdCThQek8YCYDA&ved=0CDwQ9QEwBw&sig2=pe96b-LSHP26fN8KYaB3fQ&usg=AFQjCNGYdvBqsxpvgPGSf5WNNbDUkwVgHw)
THe Getaway (1972)

Excellent crime thriller starring Steve McQueen and the stunning Ali MacGraw both on the run after a bank robbery gone wrong

8/10

http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSNzfe9je7Nd-rMdxvpGVa0BRp79fuVOEWWzsWE_D_UiTAPRTIcmMDGo-yt (http://www.google.co.uk/url?q=http://diariesofthedemented.com/horror-flick-of-the-day-stoker/&sa=U&ei=f27vUtLAComR7AalmYGYBw&ved=0CDQQ9QEwAw&sig2=144ujlXLKtG6v5QcH1Q9Vw&usg=AFQjCNELELYezeZ1GeWmuXq3JKlzIM1pRA)
Stoker

Park's first English language film, starring Nicole Kidman as the widow of a recenetly deceased man. It was never going to top any of the Vengeance trilogy but i was still pretty disappointed. Some of the shock moments were pretty decent but thats about it.

6/10

http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQraMTCa9o_tdCmx60uZjc_7nBDC_y9kLRsx5nZ5KFXhfeOIAa4UtD-hJ1H (http://www.google.co.uk/url?q=http://damngoodcup.com/barneys-version-movie-review-paul-giamattis-best/barneys-version-1&sa=U&ei=lW_vUtH3Nc6w7Abu54GoCA&ved=0CC4Q9QEwAA&sig2=dbBGU5KOBtXLA-qoaO06yA&usg=AFQjCNHOllAhNJUEFTgVPvZs2sNNfCWesw)
Barneys Version

Giamatti brilliant as always, this time playing a producer struggling to keep his life in check. I enjoyed Sideways more than this but nevertheless Giamatti is superb and very underrated inmmy opinion.

8.5/10

[RepentantSky]

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Rnx5TPnShsU/TayZpAga4dI/AAAAAAAABNo/cqpkjYSj_kg/s1600/Grave_Encounters.jpg

Grave Encounters, 2.5/5. This movie had a lot of hype behind it, but the trailers ruined all of the scary parts and three of the people in the movie just kind of disappeared, one with nothing more than an explanation that he was just gone. They should have showed us why. The worst part is, some people think this is one of scariest movies ever, and I honestly found The Woman in Black made me jump or even feel scared more than this one did. The monsters really weren't all that scary and it seems as though only one ever gave chase, and by and large they pretty much beat it. If it were me, once I learned I could touch the thing scaring me, I'd kill it and move on. The movie seemed to drag on a lot and the characters were pretty shallow. The atmosphere was done well though and actually innovates on the whole haunted hospital thing. For the that one good positive note I give it this low rating. I'll probably check out the second one soon, just to see if it's better.

[ScarletLion]

Dallas Buyers club.

7.5/10. Mconaughey and Leto are very good. Their physical appearances are very striking too. A very solid movie.

[the samoan lawyer]

http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTCyvi9W9pe6kldx9o1oz9Mh2yW7cxx039Ge4YpwXpv-yEUb6WRMs7MNC8 (http://www.google.co.uk/url?q=http://sites.lwhs.org/film1314/2013/12/01/soviet-propaganda/&sa=U&ei=T5PvUpidC4qu7AbwooDQCg&ved=0CEIQ9QEwCg&sig2=an-7fyiy5-hyyxT9CAkDgA&usg=AFQjCNHZ9o1lfzE38IEp4t69Zg1E8vrA-Q)

Battleship Potemkin

Throroughly enjoyed this. The Odessa stairs scene was unbelievable. Very moving.

8/10

[M+F Reviews]

Watched Elysium this afternoon. Easy to watch but felt it could have been a lot better. Action clips seems to happen to fast and could hardly see what was going on. The idea is good but felt it focussed on other things rather than what would have made it a lot better.

6/10

[-KhaN-]

Dial M for Murder
http://cdn.gowatchit.com/posters/original/movie_29366.jpg
Wonderful,I really enjoyed it,so intense at some moments,perfect thriller with good plot,good detective/killer plans,moves,chess play.Acting is good,whole movie is happening at one place but you never get bored,in every scene I noticed something new in apartment.He had a nice plan but...Well he panicked at key moment.In the end everything makes sense.

VERDICT:9/10

[RepentantSky]

Resident Evil Damnation, 4.5/5. There are a few too many stereotypical lines in this movie, which hits it a little hard considering at one point they basically make fun of dramatic cliche's and then move on to use them later. Other than that though, the characters are good, the story is great, the animation is impressive, and it was a good way to get people ready for what I consider a good Resident Evil game. It's a fun watch.

[Lucas]

I Stand Alone-Sick,appalling,heinous. Three words used to describe this film. It is about a vile,lonely man who does vile,nasty things. I'd say this is a good character-study, and there's nothing inherently wrong with the film.The subject matter is certainly not for everyone as it shows us the mind of a man who has sunk to unfathomable depths. I see a bit of Taxi Driver in this film.3.5

http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BMTc2MTY2NDcwNV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMzA1NDAzMQ%40%40._V1_SY317_CR4,0,214,317_.jpg

[cricket]

I Stand Alone-Sick,appalling,heinous. Three words used to describe this film. It is about a vile,lonely man who does vile,nasty things. I'd say this is a good character-study, and there's nothing inherently wrong with the film.The subject matter is certainly not for everyone as it shows us the mind of a man who has sunk to unfathomable depths. I see a bit of Taxi Driver in this film.3.5

http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BMTc2MTY2NDcwNV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMzA1NDAzMQ%40%40._V1_SY317_CR4,0,214,317_.jpg

I was looking forward to your opinion on this and I'm glad you liked it. It's been on my to see list for awhile even though Irreversible was a bit of a disappointment.

[Lucas]

I was looking forward to your opinion on this and I'm glad you liked it. It's been on my to see list for awhile even though Irreversible was a bit of a disappointment.

This isn't a film I think I will ever feel warmth towards, but I think you should check it out though . It's similar to movies like Taxi Driver and Falling Down.

[The Gunslinger45]

I Stand Alone-Sick,appalling,heinous. Three words used to describe this film. It is about a vile,lonely man who does vile,nasty things. I'd say this is a good character-study, and there's nothing inherently wrong with the film.The subject matter is certainly not for everyone as it shows us the mind of a man who has sunk to unfathomable depths. I see a bit of Taxi Driver in this film.3.5

http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BMTc2MTY2NDcwNV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMzA1NDAzMQ%40%40._V1_SY317_CR4,0,214,317_.jpg

I must see this movie then.

[cricket]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/b3/L%27Enfant_film.jpg

This is a good French drama that felt very real. It dragged slightly at times so I'm probably not rating it as highly as it deserves to be. 3

[mark f]

I rate it lower. :)

[RepentantSky]

Star Trek into Darkness, 5/5. I can seriously not remember a time I had so much fun with a movie. The acting was great, the story was great, the visuals were amazing and Kahn never worked better than that. I seriously can't find anything wrong with this movie (I'm sure someone will point something out to me) and I just enjoyed it so much. Great movie.

[Matteo]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/6/63/Prisoners2013Poster.jpg/220px-Prisoners2013Poster.jpg

Prisoners (2013, Denis Villeneuve)

A thoroughly absorbing viewing told with a remarkable deal of both restraint and assiduousness. Villeneuve's aesthetics is what separated this piece from being another unvaried and insipid throwaway thriller. The bleak and arid photography (emphasising the desolate climate these characters inhabited) felt vaguely reminiscent of Kurosawa's work in Rashomon, where weather had an imperative role in symbolising the temperament of these characters. This is a very moody and glum piece, with towering performances (Jackman and Dano being particularly imposing in their roles) and generally impressive work behind the camera. It clocks in at just over two and a half hours but never feels protracted, purely because of its well-paced writing and 'composing' nature. By composing, its story never lost any vitality, as the film proved most potent in its most significant moments. Oddly enough, I expected this film to be a rather conventional piece, but it proved anything but - it is both unflinchingly callous but also very real. The sound design was another facet worthy of recognition, too, with its low-frequency beats proving extremely effective and contributing to the ominous nature of the film. I loved this. A superb, well-crafted thriller that pretty much exceeds in all areas, ultimately making this one of the better American films of the last five years. Maybe a 8.5 or a 9.

[BlueLion]

Prisoners is probably my favorite 2013 film.

[Matteo]

Prisoners is probably my favorite 2013 film.

At the moment, it would be my second, just behind Before Midnight.

[Lucas]

At the moment, it would be my second, just behind Before Midnight.

I too have Before Midnight as the best film of 2013. There were some great films last year, but none impacted me as much as that one.

[McConnaughay]

Maybe a 8.5 or a 9.
The rating basically matches what I'd give to Prisoners as well, although, "One of the better American films in the last-five years," implies that America has been pumping out ****.


... They have. In-fact, an arguable majority.

However, I think they've also produced some of the best movies. If for no other reason because it's a place that especially thrives on films, and occasionally, gets it right. :cool:

[Voigan]

The Searchers 8.5/10
It's a bit slower than the sort of movies I usually watch but after a while I got used to the movie's pacing and I liked it better the second time I watched it. Ethan's decision not to kill Debbie at the end seemed a bit forced and out of character but that's a minor issue for me.

Spirited Away
6/10
My biggest gripe about is how much time is spent showing off the bathhouse workers and visitors rather than developing the supporting cast. On the one hand the spirits are incredibly varied and imagined even for a Miyazki movie (visually I think it's his best one) but does that really matter if the only interesting character is Chihiro? Lin, Haku, Yubaba, No Face, Zaneba, Kamaji, and the rest of the cast exist only to either help Chihiro or cause problems for her and end up as little more than plot devices instead of fleshed out characters. I didn't hate the movie or feel I'd wasted my time watching it but I didn't love it either.

[M+F Reviews]

Just watched The Hangover Part 3. Nothing special and better than the second. Very repetitive again but still an easy watch. 6/10

[McConnaughay]

Star Trek into Darkness, 5/5. I can seriously not remember a time I had so much fun with a movie. The acting was great, the story was great, the visuals were amazing and Kahn never worked better than that. I seriously can't find anything wrong with this movie (I'm sure someone will point something out to me) and I just enjoyed it so much. Great movie.
It was a lot of fun, wasn't it? I saw it in theaters last year, and was really excited for it. I don't think it really got the props it deserved from a lot of people. Khan was WHITE! Okay, but he was also Benedict Cumberbatch, who's amazing. It might not have been as good as the first, but it was close, and it kept me immersed the whole way.

[BlueLion]

http://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/Contempt.jpg

Contempt / Le Mépris (1963) - 3.5

In the beginning I thought I was going to hate it, it kind of reminded me of Pierrot le fou which was full of hipster bullsh*t. Then it got better, and in the end I was like, "ok Godard, you're cool".

[Lucas]

Ugetsu-4+. In life we always want so much, and we end up chasing out dreams but then we realize that we already had everything we need the entire time. Excuse the cheesy sentence, but that's what I got from this great film.

http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BMjE4NDE0OTI3NF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNjEyMTIzMQ%40%40._V1_SY317_CR6,0,214,317_.jpg

[Daniel M]

Contempt / Le Mépris (1963) - 3.5

In the beginning I thought I was going to hate it, it kind of reminded me of Pierrot le fou which was full of hipster bullsh*t. Then it got better, and in the end I was like, "ok Godard, you're cool".

Glad you like it. I own both Le Mépris and Pierrot Le Fou and it's a tie between them for my favourite Godard, great films, although I haven't seen much at all from him :(

[BlueLion]

Glad you like it. I own both Le Mépris and Pierrot Le Fou and it's a tie between them for my favourite Godard, great films, although I haven't seen much at all from him :(

This is how I'd personally rank Godard:

Vivre Sa Vie 4
Contempt 3.5
Masculin, Feminin 3.5
Breathless 3
Pierrot le fou 2.5


Next I'm looking forward to Band of Outsiders which I'll hopefully enjoy. When he doesn't try too much, Godard can be really good. It seems he's better when he doesn't deal with super complicated ideas.

[Matteo]

Ugetsu-4+. In life we always want so much, and we end up chasing out dreams but then we realize that we already had everything we need the entire time. Excuse the cheesy sentence, but that's what I got from this great film.

http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BMjE4NDE0OTI3NF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNjEyMTIzMQ%40%40._V1_SY317_CR6,0,214,317_.jpg

Have you seen Mizoguchi's Sansho the Bailfii yet? If not, then you're in for a truly incredible experience. That film is devastation encapsulated.

[Lucas]

Have you seen Mizoguchi's Sansho the Bailfii yet? If not, then you're in for a truly incredible experience. That film is devastation encapsulated.

Have not seen it yet, but I will view it sometime this week or maybe the next. Thanks for the recommendation.

[Guaporense]

Sansho is great, even though I found Ugetsu to be better, because it's more fun to watch (for me).

Finally watched this movie:

City of Sadness (1989)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f6/City_of_Sadness.jpg/220px-City_of_Sadness.jpg

Rating: 74/100

Featuring first rate visual qualities and a very good music score, this was for me a very relaxing and calm film experience that at the same time depicts a period of great historical violence during the civil war in China that lead to the defeat of the Republic of China and their retreat to the island of Taiwan. The film features the daily lives of a family affected by these historical events and apparently a lot of family members die/are arrested/seriously injured during the 4 years shown in the film, though the narrative is very indirect so I couldn't understand exactly everything that happened on this first watch. Despite the violence depicted, most of the time the film is very calm and relaxing.

[bluedeed]

I think Sansho the Bailiff is only rivaled by The Story of Last Chrysanthemums in Mizoguchi's oeuvre, but then probably followed by Ugetsu. Mizoguchi's films are very full and exhausting films. When I watch them, I usually don't watch another film for a few days due to emotional exhaustion (and I don't watch one of his for a while after), but also because I'm not sure how long I can sustain belief in his worlds. They're clearly the work of a highly emotional person, which I am not. The world I think I live in is much more like master Ozu's world.

Speaking of Mizoguchi though, Hou Hsiao-Hsien is, like him, one of the masters of a relatively lost art in filmmaking, intricate and depth staging. A City of Sadness is I think the best example of his meticulous and meaningful staging. Would you consider A City of Sadness art house still, Guap? As I told you, the plot's a little difficult your first time around considering it's an ensemble film and doesn't explain the historical context behind the film's actions. If you're interested in more, The Time to Live and The Time to Die, Summer at Grandpa's and The Puppetmaster are all masterful.

[Guaporense]

I had similar feelings watching Hidamari Sketch:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/d/de/Hidamari_Sketch.jpg/200px-Hidamari_Sketch.jpg

That feeling of relaxation. Though nobody dies in Hidamari Sketch.

[bluedeed]

It looks exactly like Hou's Cute Girls:
http://www.davidbordwell.net/img/figures5a12.jpg

[rauldc14]

The Conversation 7/10

[Lucas]

The Red Balloon 4

This was a neat short film, it captures the wonder and excitement of being a young child.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f2/Red_balloon.jpg

[BlueLion]

http://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/Gravity.jpg

Gravity (2013) - 3.5

Enjoyable, but unconvincing, overrated, and far from great. I expected the movie to be extremely tense and it wasn't, so in that regard, to me it failed. It could have (and it should have) been way more tense and eerie, but Cuaron was clearly going for action.

Also, there's just way too much dialogue for a 90 minute sci-fi film that takes place entirely in space. So much that it doesn't even let you properly enjoy the stunning visuals at times. And let's face it, considering the situations they were in, Sandra Bullock and George Clooney didn't look as terrified as they should have.

Would have been half a popcorn box lower if it wasn't for the impressive long takes and the camerawork.

[Cobpyth]

Too much dialogue? What movie did you watch? :p

[BlueLion]

Watch Solaris for example and see what I'm talking about. Gravity starts with tons of dialogue, and Sandra Bullock talks when the viewer should be left to savor the stunning visuals and thus soak in the film's atmosphere. But no, even when she's all alone, Bullock talks to herself constantly, and then with some chinese guy, and then she barks at his dogs, and then she talks to herself yet again, and so on.

[jiraffejustin]

I agree with BlueLion about the dialogue. I think he may have even liked the movie more than I did. Bullock was pretty annoying throughout the whole thing. The visuals were all stunning and the tension during the escape pod sequence was the second best thing about the film. I give the film the mark f rating. 2.5

[Guaporense]

Solaris the Tarkovsky film or the 2002 remake?

[Pussy Galore]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/52/Ascenseur_echafaud.jpg/220px-Ascenseur_echafaud.jpg

I really enjoyed it. I think this movie fits in the category style over substance, but it actually works. I loved the utilisation of Jazz music and the way that the car scenes were shot is much more interesting that in most 50's movies I've seen (specially north by northwest) I'd rank it 4 I think, but it's the kind of movie that will grow on me

[BlueLion]

Solaris the Tarkovsky film or the 2002 remake?

Tarkovsky. I haven't seen the remake.

[cricket]

Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance 2.5

Same thing as a couple other movies from this director; there's things I liked, but it just didn't quite work for me.

[Matteo]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/10/The_insider_movie_poster_1999.jpg/220px-The_insider_movie_poster_1999.jpg

The Insider (1999, Michael Mann)

Michael Mann's riveting and uncompromising observation into corporate avarice and journalistic dysfunction in the midst of almost unparalleled impropriety. The film examines everything from the role of the media and its devious ability to shape and distort our very perceptions to the sordid underworld of corporate influence in our institutions. This is told with a great deal intrepidity, thanks to Mann's assertion direction and its (mostly) well-written script. On one level, it is a political film. On another, a compelling character piece. It works either way. Mann has always adopted this imposing ability to balance out a story with both fleshed-out characters and potent subtext (Heat and Collateral did this remarkably well). In spite of this, the film does lose some of its vitality in its latter acts (perhaps because of the running length), and it is not as aesthetically impressive as some of Mann's other works, but it is a powerful piece that holds just as much relevance today than it did fifteen years ago. Crowe is towering in his role and Pacino does an expectably great job, too. Overall, impressive and gripping, even with its flaws. Maybe an 8 here.

[ProZombie]

Anchorman 2
8,5 / 10
I really enjoyed watching it. Love the movies of Will Ferrell.

[cricket]

Rebel Without a Cause 3.5

Not perfect for me but I was completely engrossed, and there's no denying the star power of James Dean. How tragic that the three leads all met an early demise.

[-KhaN-]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/10/The_insider_movie_poster_1999.jpg/220px-The_insider_movie_poster_1999.jpg

The Insider (1999, Michael Mann)

Michael Mann's riveting and uncompromising observation into corporate avarice and journalistic dysfunction in the midst of almost unparalleled impropriety. The film examines everything from the role of the media and its devious ability to shape and distort our very perceptions to the sordid underworld of corporate influence in our institutions. This is told with a great deal intrepidity, thanks to Mann's assertion direction and its (mostly) well-written script. On one level, it is a political film. On another, a compelling character piece. It works either way. Mann has always adopted this imposing ability to balance out a story with both fleshed-out characters and potent subtext (Heat and Collateral did this remarkably well). In spite of this, the film does lose some of its vitality in its latter acts (perhaps because of the running length), and it is not as aesthetically impressive as some of Mann's other works, but it is a powerful piece that holds just as much relevance today than it did fifteen years ago. Crowe is towering in his role and Pacino does an expectably great job, too. Overall, impressive and gripping, even with its flaws. Maybe an 8 here.

I'm glad you like it.

[rauldc14]

Tora! Tora! Tora! 6/10

[BlueLion]

http://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/Un_Chien_Andalou.jpg

Un Chien Andalou (1929) - 0.5

Like a person on Criticker said, artsy-fartsy BS.

[bluedeed]

What did you expect? It's Bunuel and Dali

[BlueLion]

It wasn't my first Bunuel. Exterminating Angel I rated 4

This, though, simply sucked.

[bluedeed]

It was a 15 minute avant-garde short during a time when the surrealists are actually a movement in the art world, much different from a somewhat surreal narrative feature in the 60s

[wintertriangles]

This, though, simply sucked.It's fine if you aren't into surrealism, but to say it sucked is silly, and it has nothing to do with the film's reputation.

[Matteo]

http://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/Un_Chien_Andalou.jpg

Un Chien Andalou (1929) - 0.5

Like a person on Criticker said, artsy-fartsy BS.

I disagree with you, but 'artsy-fartsy' made me laugh out loud. What a great term.

[-KhaN-]

Vertigo(1958,128min) - Great movie,I enjoyed it,story was good,acting was ok,as in every Hitchcock movie,intention parts are awesome,I really liked detective part of the movie,I was involved every minute.

VERDICT: 8.8/10

[rauldc14]

Nebraska 7/10. I still prefer 4 other best picture noms over it, but it was good.

[Lucas]

Le Samourai-4++.

This is some damn fine cinema. Mmmm

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_li4rlssPEq1qa6v7o.gif

This film is classy. It's about a silent assassin that abides by a very strict code. The film reminded me alot of the 2011 film Drive. Refn must've taken huge inspiration from this film. I highly recommend this if you like character-study films about loners, so if you do you will probably adore this.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/LeSamourai.jpg/220px-LeSamourai.jpg

[M+F Reviews]

Just got back from the cinema after watching 12 Years a Slave. Utterly incredible film. So powerful; from the camera shots, to the acting, the storyline itself. Just amazing. An honest film that delivers so much raw emotion and pain.

9/10

[Daniel M]

Le Samourai-4++.

This is some damn fine cinema. Mmmm

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_li4rlssPEq1qa6v7o.gif

This film is classy. It's about a silent assassin that abides by a very strict code. The film reminded me alot of the 2011 film Drive. Refn must've taken huge inspiration from this film. I highly recommend this if you like character-study films about loners, so if you do you will probably adore this.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/LeSamourai.jpg/220px-LeSamourai.jpg

Now go and watch Le Cercle Rouge :cool:

[windsoc]

"Enough Said" - 2013

I was not sure about this film to begin with. It started well but started to drag for me in the middle and I was unsure if it was going to pick up but near the end it was just wonderful, heart breaking and really drew me, the end nearly brought me to tears and it also introduced me to a wonderful new musical artist.

My rating? 8/10

[Mr Minio]

http://24.media.tumblr.com/066ad51a7eafb5edfb401dd795bea244/tumblr_mr90e0y8kw1qf7r5lo2_r1_500.gif
,,There is no solitude greater than that of the samurai unless it be that of a tiger in the jungle... perhaps..."

Le Samouraï is really stylish while Delon is an epitome of coolness!

http://s3.amazonaws.com/criterion-production/stills/131999-db1ee228967542481bd2cd2b4639e69e/Film_306w_LeSamurai_original.jpg

[Nostromo87]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/LeSamourai.jpg/220px-LeSamourai.jpg

this is a movie i've GOT to see... keep passing on it bc i figure criterion will upgrade it to blu-ray... although now i see their le Cercle Rouge Blu is out of print http://i.imdb.com/Photos/CMSIcons/emoticons/confused/hmm.gif

[Daniel M]

this is a movie i've GOT to see... keep passing on it bc i figure criterion will upgrade it to blu-ray... although now i see their le Cercle Rouge Blu is out of print http://i.imdb.com/Photos/CMSIcons/emoticons/confused/hmm.gif

I own a StudioCanal Blu-ray version of Le Cercle Rouge, don't know how easy they are to get in America and might only be region B.

[BlueLion]

Le Samourai looks awesome. Will definitely watch it one of these days.

[Mr Minio]

You really should. Watch other Melville films as well. I have seen three of them, but it's been a long time since I saw any. Will have to change it!

[Guaporense]

http://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/Un_Chien_Andalou.jpg

Un Chien Andalou (1929) - 0.5

Like a person on Criticker said, artsy-fartsy BS.

I think it was pretty good and interesting. It even involved Salvador Dali.

[Lucas]

Cries and Whispers-One of the most difficult films I have ever sat through. The distance between siblings, and their facade of loving one another. Bergman in this film deals with isolation,death,family pains, and some of the darkest aspects of human nature. I rate it a 4, mostly for the film's quality and intelligence. Not a comfortable film, nor a movie I EVER see myself rewatching.

http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BMTI3NTg2ODM1NV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNDU1OTQxMQ%40%40._V1_SY317_CR6,0,214,317_.jpg

[s1n1st3r]

http://impawards.com/2009/posters/coraline_xlg.jpg (http://impawards.com/2009/coraline.html)

Coraline

I really like this movie, one of my favourite movies has always been A Nightmare Before Christmas and I am pretty sure the same team created this. Characters are all good and the animation is great. For a movie aimed at kids I think it is a bit on the eerie side but as an adult it works for me. Not much bad I can say about this movie really.

4/5 Stars

[cricket]

The ABC's of Death 2

Out of 26 segments, I liked 9. That's not too good.

[The Gunslinger45]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/76/Birdcage_imp.jpg

Bob Dole is GORGEOUS! Hilarious film!

4

[Pussy Galore]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/12/144301~What-Ever-Happened-to-Baby-Jane-Posters.jpg/215px-144301~What-Ever-Happened-to-Baby-Jane-Posters.jpg

4 really good movie showcasing 2 of the greatest actress ever. I loved the 28 minutes documentary about Crawford and Davis that was included in the blu ray.

[McConnaughay]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1f/Salvage_%28film_poster%29.jpg/220px-Salvage_%28film_poster%29.jpg

The movie operates under a budget of seven-dollars, and I am not even sure whether or not I am joking. Really, the film was shot entirely through digital video and the credits reveal that a lot of the cast members, including the main-protagonist, actually did other crew jobs such as makeup and so on. However, that's not so bad, as long as the acting and script is good, right? Well, the acting is neither here nor there, there's no familiar faces, but I did actually enjoy the main-girl and her boyfriend. Their dialogue was a little iffy, but I think they were entertaining with what they were given, which wasn't much. The story itself isn't anything at all worth acknowledging. I mean, it steals elements from A Nightmare on Elm Street with the nightmares centered around a specific figure. However, there's no real entertainment value in them. In Elm Street, he takes your fears, and Robert Englund is amazing in his role as Freddy, but this just feels cheap and generic. They combine it with these uneven ideas and it just doesn't feel logical or unique in any way whatsoever.

The movie is only around seventy-nine minutes long, three or so for credits, and I also think a lot of scenes had the tendency to drag a lot, which goes to show that there wasn't a whole lot of depth when it came to the story. It was a story that could have been covered better in a single twenty-minute episode of the Twilight Zone. With that, it wasn't as bad as Bleeding Rose, another movie in the six-pack that I bought, but the last thirty or so minutes were a godawful mess.

5.2/10.0

[ScarletLion]

Before Midnight

Finally completed the trilogy. Good stuff as ever from Linklater. Just as you think the series is winding down slowly, there's an explosive scene. Its truly brilliant directing. The scenes are so wonderfully long and powerful. The last 40 minutes was just gripping in a "nooo what is happenning here" sort of way.

I find that when I try and describe the films to someone they sound utterly boring (that's probably the way I describe them) - Then if you look at the 3 films as a whole you think - in it's entirety, the Trilogy is actually a masterpiece.

[cricket]

The Last King of Scotland 3.5

Great performances from Forest Whitaker and James McAvoy.

[McConnaughay]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/6/67/Forrest_Gump_poster.jpg/220px-Forrest_Gump_poster.jpg
I have been putting off watching this movie for the longest times, but I finally got around to watching it. I saw it a couple of times whenever I was younger but I was so young that it never really registered with me. However, after seeing now, I can tell you that it was much darker than I thought it was, I think I read somebody else say this, but there's a lot of big laughs and but more small realities. It lets you see a world of hate, death, and prejudice from a person that doesn't necessarily understand any of those things, however, when it comes to love and compassion, he excels above and beyond everybody else.

There was a lot of things that pissed me off in the movie, but that added to the beauty of it. For example, I hated Jenny, I thought she was an antagonist more than a love-interest even by the end, however, it was one of the things that added to the variables that made the movie feel more mesmerizing. She had a really bad life, and it reality, life sometimes just kicks the crap out of you, but I felt like she was a dick to Gump a lot. Tom Hanks did tremendous in his role as Forrest, and I enjoyed the storytelling and pace a lot. The movie was nearly three-hours, and not once was I bored.

[Pussy Galore]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/26/Sweetsmell.jpg/220px-Sweetsmell.jpg
53.5

great movie about non only the corruption of newpaper, but about the way that some people have a money centered, moral less vision of success and how it can affect your life negatively. Lancaster was fantastic and I got that film noir feel

[windsoc]

The Worlds End

I really loved this film, I know a lot of people have said it is the weak of the three but I really disagree. It can get a bit silly at time but as I have said on other places the scene between Gary and Andy brings a tear to my eye and this is why it is great. It is the most emotionally involving film - it lets us see that the characters have flaws and it is not wrong to show them. The line when gary shouts "because it's all I've got" and "they tell me when to go to bed", amazing stuff.

9/10

[-KhaN-]

Thor:The Dark World
http://sciencefiction.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Thor-Dark-World.png

Who is the man with the master plan!?Its Loki! :)
This movie was so cool,I mean if you take it for what it is.Story is ofc coming after Avengers and you can see that,character development is good.There is one thing that I find awful,it is Thors relationship with Jane,it is so unrealistic and idiotic,Mjolnir and whole Thor universe is more realistic,I know Loki is in handcuffs but really can some chick slap him?Are you so stupid that you want to slap someone like Loki?Yea it is reference to Avengers but slapping Loki and saying "this is for New York " is not a good line,but rest of dialog is good,some really funny scenes,train scene is perfect,so funny...That ending wow,it was so awesome,kinda new he will be there but not in that position.Fight scenes are good,atmosphere is good,just a good movie.It was nice to see Eccleston in this movie,every time I saw him,I was expecting Doctor Who team song. :)

VERDICT 8.5/10

[M+F Reviews]

Managed to catch the majority of Snatch on telly. Funny film with some very odd Irish accents. 8/10

[cricket]

Adaptation 3.5

I liked the story and the cast was great.

[JayDee]

I had actually expected this review to come in much shorter but it kind of kept growing. Decided to still post it here as opposed to my reviews thread, though I might still post it there as well, especially if I work a little more on it



mirror mirror


Year of release
2013

Directed by
David O. Russell

Starring
Christian Bale
Amy Adams
Bradley Cooper
Jennifer Lawrence
Jeremy Renner
Louis C.K.

American Hustle

3

I know this film has amassed quite a sizeable fanbase on here but what can I say, I wasn't particularly excited by it. I'll certainly give it credit for being a well made and exceptionally well acted film, unlike the marks that the con artists target however I never felt myself being taken in by their charms. In the knowledge that this may well incite a small riot on here, dare I say I even found it all a little bit......dull? I'd certainly say that was particularly true of the opening hour, with the film really taking considerable time to get into the real swing of things. It was only when the sheikh 'arrived' in the jet and the con got under way that I felt the story start to come to some sort of life. Even then however it never matched my expectations; perhaps it was the fault of the film's advertising but I was expecting a far breezier, more comedic venture. When it comes to con films/TV shows I think it should be a lot slicker, flashier and sexier than what this was. And its running time of 138 minutes felt way too long for a story of this nature. Cutting out a chunk of that running time would perhaps have helped the film find that energy that I felt was lacking.

As I said at the start though the performances across the board are almost uniformly excellent. Christian Bale delivered one of his most impressive performances that I've seen while Bradley Cooper again excelled under the direction of Russell. Stars of the show for me though were the ladies of the piece. Amy Adams was excellent and damn sexy in a series of revealing outfits. In fact such prominence is played on sideboob that her breasts should have gotten their own credit. And whoever her costume designer was deserves an Oscar for services to humanity! But taking the MVP plaudits was Jennifer Lawrence. Definitely my favourite thing about the film, whenever she appeared on screen the film gained a spark I felt was otherwise lacking. She was one of the saving graces, the other being the very amusing and combative discourse between Cooper and his boss, played by Louis C.K.

And credit also to Russell, his cinematographer Linus Sandgren and the production design crew because the film does look and feel very much like the 70s, or at least like a 70s movie. Oh and a really fun soundtrack as well. Russell's direction certainly seems quite confident and assured, with his direction and the film as a whole having a bit of a Scorsese vibe. However I'd certainly call it 'Scorsese Lite.' And perhaps this is just what I imbued the film with personally, but I just got a sense of smugness and self-satisfaction about the whole project, with the film seeming really proud of itself. And I really didn't feel that it should have been. The script is often clumsy, relying heavily on contrivances and characters occasionally acting out of character. The plot, especially for its lengthy running time, is pretty basic and lacking in substance while it's characters don't have a great deal of depth, coming across as under developed and largely unlikeable. In fact that was one of the main obstacles to my really enjoying this film; I never came to care for any of the characters and so had little interest in who came out on top of the various games of cat and mouse. That marked a major departure from how I felt about the characters in Russell's last film, Silver Linings Playbook.

It's a decent and nice enough film that has its moments, but just as many flaws, and is strongly acted. All in all however I really was left slightly baffled as to why Hollywood and film critics have fallen so in love with it. There already seems to have been a bit of a backlash against the film amongst cinema audiences and I think that will only grow if it somehow sneaks off with the Best Picture at the Oscars. In a few years time I could easily imagine it being talked about as one of the weaker winners of the big prize.

[The Gunslinger45]

http://i1329.photobucket.com/albums/w541/juanLopez85/Dude_zpsbd8dd56d.jpg (http://s1329.photobucket.com/user/juanLopez85/media/Dude_zpsbd8dd56d.jpg.html)

I thought American hustle was good, but not great. And I too was not taken in by the charms of the cast despite it being very well acted. The performances were there, but O Russell is not the storyteller Scorsese is.

[Godoggo]

I wasn't that in love with it and also found it dull in spots, so you're not alone. I thought it was the worst of the Oscar bunch until I saw 12 Years a Slave.

[Godoggo]

I thought American hustle was good, but not great. And I too was not taken in by the charms of the cast despite it being very well acted. The performances were there, but O Russell is not the storyteller Scorsese is.

Yeah, that may be part of the reason why Silver Linings worked so well and American Hustle didn't. Silver didn't have nearly as much story to it.

[Lucas]

Dogville- A three hour avant-garde film, filled with shaky cam and amateur cinematography, that takes place in only in one location the entire time. This location is a half built town(a set to be exact), where mostly everything instead of actually being there is drawn out in chalk. This is made by Lars Von Trier might I add. What do I think of this experimental film? I think it is Fantastic. I think it's one of the most ambitious,unique films I have ever seen. Somehow LvT makes this film work. It shows us an innocent little town with nice little people, and as the film progresses we see how depraved and evil humans really are.

This film is extremely anti-american. The closing credits made me burst out with laughter. LvT is a master troll, he loves pushing buttons. How dare he make such a film, some might ask. I honestly encourage something as inventive as this. Seeing a film that sh*ts on conformity. There are a million reasons to hate this film, but I don't hate it whatsoever. Bold,daring,controversial cinema.Try to check it out if you dare. 4

http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BMTkwNTg2MTI1NF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMDM1MzUyMQ%40%40._V1_SY720_SX486_.jpg

[The Gunslinger45]

Yeah, that may be part of the reason why Silver Linings worked so well and American Hustle didn't. Silver didn't have nearly as much story to it.

Surprising since I cared for that movie even less. JLaw was awesome in both though.

[BlueLion]

http://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/2001_A_Space_Odyssey.jpg

2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) (rewatch) - 5

It is timeless today, and will be even after thousands of years.

[rauldc14]

If Hustle were to win BP (and it won't), it would be my favorite BP since No Country for Old Men. Then again so would Gravity.

[Mmmm Donuts]

http://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/2001_A_Space_Odyssey.jpg

2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) (rewatch) - 5

It is timeless today, and will be even after thousands of years.

You sir, are correct.

[Mmmm Donuts]

I had actually expected this review to come in much shorter but it kind of kept growing. Decided to still post it here as opposed to my reviews thread, though I might still post it there as well, especially if I work a little more on it]

In other words, if you think you can pick up more reps if you repost this in your thread, you'll do it, right? ;)

I would probably rep it again anyways, because it was an excellent review.

[cricket]

Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? 4.5

Agonizing to watch at times, in a good way, with acting and writing as good as I've seen.

[Matteo]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f8/The_Face_of_Another_poster.jpg/220px-The_Face_of_Another_poster.jpg

The Face of Another (1966, Hiroshi Teshigahara)

The last film in Teshigahara's informal trilogy. This is an erudite assessment of identity and selfhood in a gargantuan, disconnected world that embraces the appearance more than anything else. Like its predecessors, the film spawns some impressive sound design and a notable presence behind the camera. Like The Women in the Dunes, it seems to have this matchlessly incongruous touch that very few films I have seen can replicate. It is such a real tale on one level, but also feels strangely surreal on another - the imagery is downright alluring. This piece is also a great example on how you can make a 'hard' science fiction film without resorting to its 'predictable' conventions. My only quibble stands in its writing which lacked a strong degree of subtlety and all too often spelled out - what seemed to be - the themes and notions of the film. It felt strained and unnatural. Other than that, a very good film. Maybe a 7.5 or an 8.

[davidjones]

I watched 21 Jump Street... i can't stop laughing, very amazing movie and i really can't wait for the sequel this year.

[davidjones]

The movie is nice. But,i guess Christian Bale may win an Oscar. But in my opinion, Gravity and The wolf of Wall Street got big shots too.
I don't think Jennifer Lawrence can win it again.
Jonah Hill, there is 80% chance he will receive one.
FROZEN may win best animation of the year.
Sorry, i don't think Dicaprio can do it this year.

[davidjones]

"Dumb and Dumber"
It is 1994 film. Quite old movie, but i watched it the other night for the first time. It was really amazing, i enjoyed it a lot. I know Jim Carrey is brilliant actor. I watched "The Mask" before, but these days we don't hear much from him. Is it because he is old?
Not so sure, i mean people these days kind of ignore comedy movies in general, unless it contains some dirty work or bad scenes. I recall "Horrible Bosses", and "Bridesmaid". Those were big hits mainly because of the content.
But others like "Grown Ups" struggle to attract views. Adam Sandler is not funny any more.
Anyway, "Dumb and Dumber TO" sequel is coming out this year. I definitely will watch it. The surprise is that both lead actors from 1994 will lead the cast in the sequel. Plus Jennifer Lawrence filmed a cameo too.;)

[The Rodent]

Oblivion

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/2e/Oblivion2013Poster.jpg


Think WALL-E crossed with Moon.

Although... it isn't a patch on either and I was thoroughly bored from start to end.

0.5

[The Rodent]

Lawless...

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/a0/Lawless_film_poster.jpg


My God that's a good film.

Great story telling and screenplay, characters that engage the viewer on all fronts, whether it be hating them or loving them... and the acting across the board is faultless.

Favourite Shia LaBeouf role by far, he's definitely redeemed himself after a string of bad movies...

... and (I've said this before about Hardy in Warrior) yet again Tom Hardy is cementing himself as one of my favourite actors of all time.

So glad I bought this on DVD today. One of the best of the 2010s by a long way.


5 with an extra 5... and another 1 for good luck.

[The Sci-Fi Slob]

Oblivion

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/2e/Oblivion2013Poster.jpg


Think WALL-E crossed with Moon.

Although... it isn't a patch on either and I was thoroughly bored from start to end.

0.5

It's not the greatest sci-fi ever, but half a star? It's better than that - solid 3 star film for me.

[-KhaN-]

The Amazing Spider-Man
http://adoptingjames.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/spider-man.jpg

I hoped this won't happen but it did,only thing good in this movie is creation of "parents mystery",I guess it is a decent start of series,it was boring most of the time,best scenes were at Oscorp,part 2 will probably be a lot better,I mean from the trailer it looks like they took best parts of this movie and done them better,and ofc more of them,best part of this movie for me is that mystery,everything else was just basic.Decant movie,second one will probably be a lot better.

VERDICT: 6.5/10