Shoutistics
242,411
Total Shouts
16
Last 24 Hours
Leaderboard
The Shoutbox
Maybe you can indulge me, anyway, privately. My suspicion is that there will turn out to be only superficial similarities based on common phrases, for a few reasons.
If the issue is as serious as you say, then it would seem clearly important enough to substantiate, because otherwise there's no chance someone will read it and, I dunno, stop using their cell phone, or whatever. So the degree to which it matters at all should equal the degree to which it's worth elaborating on.
If the issue is as serious as you say, then it would seem clearly important enough to substantiate, because otherwise there's no chance someone will read it and, I dunno, stop using their cell phone, or whatever. So the degree to which it matters at all should equal the degree to which it's worth elaborating on.
Originally Posted by Yoda
Unless you know a member here and have been exchanging texts with them, this is obviously implausible.
I also fail to see why it would have to be "dutifully published" if you'd rather ignore them than substantiate the claim.
If there's an actual problem, PM myself or Seds with evidence. If it doesn't rise to that level, then it doesn't rise to the level of posting vague insinuations, either.
I also fail to see why it would have to be "dutifully published" if you'd rather ignore them than substantiate the claim.
If there's an actual problem, PM myself or Seds with evidence. If it doesn't rise to that level, then it doesn't rise to the level of posting vague insinuations, either.
No need to further pursue this as there can be no resolution.
Unless you know a member here and have been exchanging texts with them, this is obviously implausible.
I also fail to see why it would have to be "dutifully published" if you'd rather ignore them than substantiate the claim.
If there's an actual problem, PM myself or Seds with evidence. If it doesn't rise to that level, then it doesn't rise to the level of posting vague insinuations, either.
I also fail to see why it would have to be "dutifully published" if you'd rather ignore them than substantiate the claim.
If there's an actual problem, PM myself or Seds with evidence. If it doesn't rise to that level, then it doesn't rise to the level of posting vague insinuations, either.
Originally Posted by Sedai
Originally Posted by Act III
Was forced to ignore a member who was posting shouts that were plagairised, copied and parodying text messages on my personal cellphone. Coincidence? Not remotely.
Originally Posted by Act III
Was forced to ignore a member who was posting shouts that were plagairised, copied and parodying text messages on my personal cellphone. Coincidence? Not remotely.