[quote=cricket][quote=Yoda]I thought she was pretty smart at first but she's had a ton of unforced errors. Had to reverse herself on major policy issues more than once already. Lack of experience, maybe.[/quote]

I don't even mean what she knows, but how she presents herself. She is cold and calculated and has a certain self awareness that most of the candidates don't come close to. They're all smart but I think it's how they present themselves that's more important. Most of them come off as misfits that were picked on a lot as teenagers.[/quote]

[quote=Yoda]Seems very much like a "I'm running now because this is my best opportunity" candidacy as opposed to a "I'm ready for this job" candidacy.[/quote]

[quote=Yoda]I thought she was pretty smart at first but she's had a ton of unforced errors. Had to reverse herself on major policy issues more than once already. Lack of experience, maybe.[/quote]

[quote=cricket]I think Kamala Harris is the smartest and most dangerous democrat, and she's also the candidate I personally like the least. I can't see Tulsi having any chance.[/quote]

[quote=doubledenim][font=century Gothic]Isn't it all just "dog and pony" until Biden gets the nom. 

Assuming the Democrats don't cannibalize their only chance. [/font][/quote]

[quote=MovieBuffering][quote=Sedai][quote=doubledenim][font=century gothic]Did any Democrat candidate give anybody reason to believe Trump's re-election isn't a lock? [/font][/quote]


Tulsi (debating tonight) is the only candidate trying to reach the moderate people who pulled the level for Trump in 2016 - the people the Dems need to win this time around.[/quote]

I think Yang is too. He has been on plenty of conservative shows. I think a Yang/Tulsi ticket is the Dems best chance. They actually treat the right human and embrace conversation with them. Tulsi expertise is foreign policy and Yang's is domestic. Both diverse candidates. I lean more conservative but I'd give great thought in voting for them. I just hope it's not a Trojan horse for straight up socialism.[/quote]

[quote=Sedai][quote=doubledenim][font=century gothic]Did any Democrat candidate give anybody reason to believe Trump's re-election isn't a lock? [/font][/quote]


Tulsi (debating tonight) is the only candidate trying to reach the moderate people who pulled the level for Trump in 2016 - the people the Dems need to win this time around.[/quote]

[quote=MovieGal]I am sick and tired of ppl in Hollywood who have no creative mind. They keep stealing ideas from foreign cinema. They remade After The Wedding, originally a Danish film with Mads in it, who is being replaced by Michelle Williams.  F*** this sh**!!!![/quote]

[quote=doubledenim][quote=Iroquois]And Samuel L. Jackson barely missed out on playing Mr. Orange's buddy so QT wrote Jules specifically for him as a result.

Maybe it's a hindsight thing, but Woods neer seemed like a good fit for Mr. Orange - that's a character that benefits from being played by a younger actor (especially considering the dynamic he shares with Mr. White).[/quote]

[font=century Gothic] It was the Orange role and the popular sentiment was that Woods was too old. [/font][/quote]

[quote=Iroquois]And Samuel L. Jackson barely missed out on playing Mr. Orange's buddy so QT wrote Jules specifically for him as a result.

Maybe it's a hindsight thing, but Woods neer seemed like a good fit for Mr. Orange - that's a character that benefits from being played by a younger actor (especially considering the dynamic he shares with Mr. White).[/quote]

[quote=doubledenim][font=century gothic]QT wanted James Woods for Reservoir Dogs, but his agent turned the offer down multiple times without even informing Woods.

Upon hearing news of this, Woods promptly fired his agent.[/font][/quote]