Re: The 27th General Hall of Fame
NOMINATIONS https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/..._AC_SY445_.jpg Safety Last! (1923) Directors: Fred C. Newmeyer, Sam Taylor (U.S) 1h14m Nominated by: Allaby https://image.posterlounge.ie/img/pr...4_poster_l.jpg Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) Director: Steven Spielberg (U.S.) 1h 55m Nominated by: Citizen Rules https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/...IL._SX342_.jpg One Cut of the Dead aka Kamera o Tomeru na! (2017) Director: Shin'ichirō Ueda (Japan) 1h 36m Nominated by: CosmicRunaway https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...Girl_filme.jpg Magical Girl aka Magična devojka (2014) Director: Carlos Vermut (Spain) 2h 7m Nominated by: cricket https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/..._AC_SX466_.jpg Baby Face (1933) Director: Alfred E. Green (U.S) 1h 11m Nominated by: edarsenal https://images.aspireauctions.com/au...pg?73284130000 Apocalypse Now (1979) *No Specific Edtion/Cut necessary - Viewer's Choice* Director: Francis Ford Coppola (U.S) 2h 27m Nominated by: jiraffejustin https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/...zJafL._AC_.jpg True Romance (1993) Director: Tony Scott (U.S) 1h 59m Nominated by: Miss Vicky https://iv1.lisimg.com/image/4170974...ons-poster.jpg Demons akaShura (1971) Director: Toshio Matsumoto 2h 14m Nominated by: pahaK https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...vie_poster.jpg Jaws (1975) Director: Steven Spielberg (U.S) 2h 4m Nominated by: PHOENIX74 https://irs.www.warnerbros.com/keyar...kip_keyart.jpg My Dog Skip (2000) Director: Jay Russell (U.S.) 1h 35m Nominated by: Siddon https://cdn3.volusion.com/bxqxk.xvup...che=1327064021 Midnight Cowboy (1969) Director: John Schlesinger (U.S.) 1h 53m Nominated by: SpelingError https://pics.filmaffinity.com/Thunde...48030-mmed.jpg Thunder Road (2018) Nominated by: Takoma11 https://i.pinimg.com/originals/52/8d...ef11e19534.jpg Dolores Claiborne (1995) Director Taylor Hackford (U.S.) 2h 12m Nominated by Thief https://pics.filmaffinity.com/Cure-618672879-large.jpg Cure (1997) Director: Kiyoshi Kurosawa (Japan) 1h 51m Nominated by: TheUsualSuspect https://i.pinimg.com/originals/85/ee...7085002a52.jpg The Secret of Roan Inish (1994) Director: John Sayles (Ireland) 1h 43m Nominated by Torgo https://pics.filmaffinity.com/L_amou...33952-mmed.jpg L'amour braque aka Mad Love (1985) Director: Andrzej Zulawski (France) 1h 41m Nominated by: ueno_station54 |
Re: The 27th General Hall of Fame
I guess I'll end my hiatus. Here's hoping I don't regret it.
Nomination sent. |
First one of these for me. Not participating, but will hang out and see how this works. So I'll be ready for the 28th event.
|
Originally Posted by Miss Vicky (Post 2270438)
I guess I'll end my hiatus. Here's hoping I don't regret it.
Nomination sent. |
Originally Posted by John Dumbear (Post 2270444)
First one of these for me. Not participating, but will hang out and see how this works. So I'll be ready for the 28th event.
|
Originally Posted by Citizen Rules (Post 2270460)
You'll regret it when you see my nom;)
|
Re: The 27th General Hall of Fame
i'm in. gonna nominate some superhero bs since my original pick just doesn't exist on the internet it seems.
|
Re: The 27th General Hall of Fame
I'm in!
|
Re: The 27th General Hall of Fame
I'll make my decision once the doors open.
|
Re: The 27th General Hall of Fame
I am not 100% in and I will be waiting this time. If the noms look ok and sincerely look like enjoyable films I'll join. Too much nom bombing lately I have to admit.
Hopefully people can see where I'm coming from. If not you can watch a guy who's been in 24/26 generals not join anymore. Pretty proud of what was created with this and hopefully I can keep participating. |
Originally Posted by rauldc14 (Post 2270504)
I am not 100% in and I will be waiting this time. If the noms look ok and sincerely look like enjoyable films I'll join. Too much nom bombing lately I have to admit.
Hopefully people can see where I'm coming from. If not you can watch a guy who's been in 24/26 generals not join anymore. Pretty proud of what was created with this and hopefully I can keep participating. I should be able to join this one. I'll submit my movie later this week. |
Originally Posted by Torgo (Post 2270506)
Have you considered creating a private Hall of Fame that only has people who choose films that you know you will like? That way, you won't ever be disappointed.
I should be able to join this one. I'll submit my movie later this week. |
Originally Posted by rauldc14 (Post 2270507)
That's not what I meant and maybe I should reclarify. I'll summarize by saying is Themroc and Daisies Hall of Fame candidate worthy?
|
Re: The 27th General Hall of Fame
Couldn't tell that by her reviews. Hell one was an atrocious blind watch.
If people want me on the sidelines for these to watch movies like that then I guess it is what it is. No hard feelings. |
Originally Posted by rauldc14 (Post 2270507)
That's not what I meant and maybe I should reclarify. I'll summarize by saying is Themroc and Daisies Hall of Fame candidate worthy?
|
Re: The 27th General Hall of Fame
And now she's nominating a "BS" Superhero movie. And yes those are her words too.
|
Originally Posted by rauldc14 (Post 2270507)
That's not what I meant and maybe I should reclarify. I'll summarize by saying is Themroc and Daisies Hall of Fame candidate worthy?
They aren’t exactly trashy films. Daisies is even recognized as amongst Czechoslovakia’s top films. Your stance here screams of “select films I want or I won’t join.” That, to me, goes against the spirit of these. |
The main thing I've enjoyed about these tournaments is seeing movies I haven't seen before. Like, I know people want to win, but I've seen Vertigo and The Deer Hunter and No Country for Old Men and I know why they're great and why people think they're great.
I think that probably about half of my legitimately favorite movies would maybe be seen as trolling. But I, for example, genuinely think that Brain Damage is a great film and I watch it a lot and I think about it a lot and it evokes very strong emotions in me. The main thing holding me back from nominating it is that it would make me sad to watch 10 of my forum-peers totally trash it, LOL. Anyway, I will be in as long as none of the nominated films cross my personal no-go boundaries. |
Re: The 27th General Hall of Fame
I'll copy something I wrote in the 26th HoF as this is the same controversy which popped up last time:
We all know that Themroc was really love-it-or-hate-it among us (well, maybe not "love-it" lmao), but Daisies, by comparison, is generally considered to be a much better film. A number of critical essays have been written about it, Criterion included it in one of their Eclipse series on the Czech New Wave, and Sight & Sound listed it as one of the best films of all time in 2012. To my understanding, while ueno_station wanted to pick another weird film for this Hall of Fame, she went with something that has more of a classic status. As an aside, here's the Criterion essay for this film, if you're curious (scroll down a bit on the page to get to the essay for Daisies). |
Re: The 27th General Hall of Fame
Also, I'm in. I'll send my nomination later today.
|
Also, I'm sure edarsenal will be a great host :up:
|
Re: The 27th General Hall of Fame
As an aside, I'm sure that crumbsroom would've liked Themroc.
|
So I'm reading the plot summary for Themroc and, I'm sorry, but "Made on a low budget with no intelligible dialog," is EXACTLY the kind of movie I want in at least one of the nominations. Not all of them, mind you, but c'mon. Live a little!
In this moment, would I rather rewatch Citizen Kane for the nth time, or watch a 70s film where a worker becomes a caveman? You already know the answer to that question. |
I pretty much enjoy watching those films that I haven’t seen before, especially those from other countries. I purposely seek out these types of films, and I’m constantly searching for older films from various countries for this purpose.
That’s why Daisies and In a Glass Cage, another nomination maligned for its selection (and one I enjoyed),were worthwhile to me |
Originally Posted by Takoma11 (Post 2270578)
So I'm reading the plot summary for Themroc and, I'm sorry, but "Made on a low budget with no intelligible dialog," is EXACTLY the kind of movie I want in at least one of the nominations. Not all of them, mind you, but c'mon. Live a little!
|
Originally Posted by rauldc14 (Post 2270507)
That's not what I meant and maybe I should reclarify. I'll summarize by saying is Themroc and Daisies Hall of Fame candidate worthy?
Originally Posted by rauldc14 (Post 2270512)
Couldn't tell that by her reviews. Hell one was an atrocious blind watch...
I've hated on a LOT of noms myself, usually I hate about 1/3 of them but I do write a detailed enough review so people can see where I'm coming from in my opinion. I would suggest Ueno explain a bit more in her reviews what the problems with the movies are. That might help. |
Originally Posted by Takoma11 (Post 2270566)
The main thing I've enjoyed about these tournaments is seeing movies I haven't seen before. Like, I know people want to win, but I've seen Vertigo and The Deer Hunter and No Country for Old Men and I know why they're great and why people think they're great...
This time I went with a well known film myself. Sometimes I don't. Just depends on my mood. |
Originally Posted by Citizen Rules (Post 2270612)
I agree with you on this. I think that's where the problem stems from. It's not Ueno herself who seems cool but it's that she blows off the majority of the films with a flippant, one liner insult. Which then to some sounds disingenuous. I've hated on a LOT of noms myself, usually I hate about 1/3 of them but I do write a detailed enough review so people can see where I'm coming from in my opinion. I would suggest Ueno explain a bit more in her reviews what the problems with the movies are. That might help. While I wouldn’t say her reviews are insightful, and definitely dismissive and lacking on good faith effort in giving the films a fair attempt, she does typically write a few paragraphs in regards to these films from what I’ve remembered. |
Originally Posted by Wyldesyde19 (Post 2270617)
While I wouldn’t say her reviews are insightful, and definitely dismissive and lacking on good faith effort in giving the films a fair attempt, she does typically write a few paragraphs in regards to these films from what I’ve remembered.
|
Originally Posted by ueno_station54 (Post 2270489)
i'm in. gonna nominate some superhero bs since my original pick just doesn't exist on the internet it seems.
Originally Posted by rauldc14 (Post 2270514)
And now she's nominating a "BS" Superhero movie. And yes those are her words too.
*Note: I did message Ueno earlier and offered to help find her first movie choice. |
Re: The 27th General Hall of Fame
*wonders if she picked the wrong time to come back*
|
Re: The 27th General Hall of Fame
I hope it sets up to me joining. I'm just saying I'm not putting myself through a Themroc/In a Glass Cage scenario.
Probably came across as a temper tantrum. I obviously don't expect to like every film I just legitimately want people to nominate films they like and not nominate just to get people to watch a strange/absurb film for the hell of it. |
Re: The 27th General Hall of Fame
to clarify, the superhero bs im nominating is something i've wanted to nominate for awhile because i genuinely loved it last time i saw it. as for my reviews being bad im just a very shallow film watcher.
|
Originally Posted by rauldc14 (Post 2270632)
I obviously don't expect to like every film I just legitimately want people to nominate films they like and not nominate just to get people to watch a strange/absurb film for the hell of it.
|
Re: The 27th General Hall of Fame
also the superhero bs was rejected. it was a miniseries and those being allowed or not seems to vary from host to host. so the replacement replacement nom is something ive legitimately never heard anyone say a bad word about so hope this one works out.
|
Originally Posted by Takoma11 (Post 2270578)
So I'm reading the plot summary for Themroc and, I'm sorry, but "Made on a low budget with no intelligible dialog," is EXACTLY the kind of movie I want in at least one of the nominations. Not all of them, mind you, but c'mon. Live a little!
In this moment, would I rather rewatch Citizen Kane for the nth time, or watch a 70s film where a worker becomes a caveman? You already know the answer to that question. |
Re: The 27th General Hall of Fame
Anyways, just sent my nomination.
|
Re: The 27th General Hall of Fame
also i admit Themroc was an off the grid pull. it was the first general HoF i was in and coming off of one genre HoF prior which are a bit more lax seemingly I thought that would be fine. im not gonna blind pick again, at least not entirely (will probably do a lot of things i saw a long time ago and want to revisit). you can go look at the list of my favourite films i posted here awhile ago Daisies is in the top 10 and it has been for a long time that was a very genuine nomination i assure you.
|
Originally Posted by rauldc14 (Post 2270632)
I hope it sets up to me joining. I'm just saying I'm not putting myself through a Themroc/In a Glass Cage scenario.
Probably came across as a temper tantrum. I obviously don't expect to like every film I just legitimately want people to nominate films they like and not nominate just to get people to watch a strange/absurb film for the hell of it. |
Can I just say thank you to @edarsenal for not allowing miniseries? I did not sign up to watch TV.
|
Originally Posted by pahaK (Post 2270640)
In a Glass Cage was on my all-time top-100 ballot so what's your issue with it again?
|
Originally Posted by pahaK (Post 2270640)
In a Glass Cage was on my all-time top-100 ballot so what's your issue with it again?
|
Originally Posted by rauldc14 (Post 2270643)
We've already talked about this one before. It's in that thread.
|
Re: The 27th General Hall of Fame
Anyways, this is a very drama-filled introduction to this Hall, but after all this is finished, let's hope for smooth sailing from here.
|
Originally Posted by pahaK (Post 2270646)
I didn't ask why you don't like the film, but what's your issue with the nomination? It's certainly fine by the criteria you provided a few posts earlier (...I just legitimately want people to nominate films they like...). Feels awfully like a "temper tantrum" to me :rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by SpelingError (Post 2270644)
While I enjoyed your nomination, I understand why it got some backlash given that it was an extreme film which showed actual scenes of underage boys being disrobed and sexually touched on camera by an older man. It's a bit different than Themroc and Daisies, given that the backlash those films received were mostly due to them being weird more than containing potentially objectionable content.
Sorry about this slightly off-topic rant. This has no effect on me joining or not and fortunately, I don't know any other pedophile nazi murderer films I'd like. |
Originally Posted by SpelingError (Post 2270577)
As an aside, I'm sure that crumbsroom would've liked Themroc.
That definitely sounds up my alley. And kudos to having such a thing nominated. Now hopefully it's going to be easy for me to find a link to stream it........ |
Well what I like about my nom's is I try and move away from genre, age, and prestige and give you guys an experience. You never know what a Siddon nomination is going to be.
|
Originally Posted by rauldc14 (Post 2270648)
Did you honestly see that movie getting good feedback? It was an obvious last place the minute the synopsis was read.
|
Originally Posted by crumbsroom (Post 2270653)
That definitely sounds up my alley. And kudos to having such a thing nominated. Now hopefully it's going to be easy for me to find a link to stream it........
|
Originally Posted by Siddon (Post 2270655)
Well what I like about my nom's is I try and move away from genre, age, and prestige and give you guys an experience. You never know what a Siddon nomination is going to be.
|
::adjusts Host hat::
::clears throat:: https://i.imgur.com/lDrW2Ck.gif All righty, then, allow me to address some truly important issues, if I may. The first and most important, I feel, that yes, Speling is VERY correct. I AM a d@mn good host. I rock, I roll, and even shimmy and groove, so there's that. Secondly, and equally important: WELCOME BACK MISS VICKY!!!! https://thumbs.gfycat.com/AgonizingD...ow-max-1mb.gif Next; We're at a very excellent rate on day one of nominations with eight folks in, two on the sidelines accompanying a new spectator -- WELCOME @Dumbear!! Sit back, enjoy, and I'm very happy to have you here! Regarding @rauldc14 and his concerns he has the right, as we all do, to voice them, and I have love and respect for the man and I'd rather things were allowed their time to "air out" than to fester. We love this format and the myriad of opportunities it presents for us movie lovers/watchers so it's best to speak out and to respect one another and our myriad of opinions/views on all sides. @ueno_station54 is new and like all of us, will adjust while, hopefully, staying true to herself as a fellow movie watcher. Not everyone gels with everyone and for good and for bad, variety is a good thing. We can applaud. We can groan and b#tch. Both of which are ALSO a good thing. I did reject her initial series suggestion, simply because this is a Movie HoF and I do firmly believe that a Specialty HoF of Mini-Series would be excellent and her "superhero bs lol" ;) would fit beautifully there. When Siddon's mini-series was accepted it was a very singular exception that, for me, paid off. But, again, as Host, I wanted to stay within the set format of Films and would happily participate in a Specialty HoF of mini-series. Speling's Twilight Zone is an excellent example of how well such an HoF would do. That should do for now, till next we meet. . . https://24.media.tumblr.com/704cfade...8cfso1_500.gif |
Originally Posted by pahaK (Post 2270651)
Yet for some reason Christine F. featuring a 13- or 14-year-old girl giving a hand job to an adult man, having sex with her junkie boyfriend, and doing drugs didn't raise any eyebrows. Also Pixote featuring a rape of a young boy, full-frontal underaged nudity, and said boy kissing an adult woman raised only small concerns from one user (I'd remember).
Sorry about this slightly off-topic rant. This has no effect on me joining or not and fortunately, I don't know any other pedophile nazi murderer films I'd like. |
Originally Posted by SpelingError (Post 2270668)
Since I haven't seen those films, nor was I a participant in the respective Halls for those films, I'd have to watch them to form an opinion on the content in them. Regardless, my post was more of a general statement that extreme films shouldn't be nominated in main Halls. They'd be more appropriate for an extreme film HoF if anyone were to put one together.
|
Originally Posted by Citizen Rules (Post 2270614)
I've seen a lot of films but I have not seen 2 out of 3 of those (The Deer Hunter and No Country for Old Men).
This time I went with a well known film myself. Sometimes I don't. Just depends on my mood. The value I've gotten out of these HoF experiences is seeing films that weren't on my radar or that I would not have sought out on my own.
Originally Posted by rauldc14 (Post 2270637)
Go watch it then. Have fun.
Originally Posted by rauldc14 (Post 2270648)
Did you honestly see that movie getting good feedback? It was an obvious last place the minute the synopsis was read.
It comes down to whether you mean what you say about people nominating things they love and think that some others may really like. Like I said in the thread at the time, I was as disturbed by the child abuse in Antwone Fisher as what happened in In a Glass Cage. Moreso, honestly, because it was a thing happening to a real person and not part of a larger allegory. This is a potluck. Do you want people to bring food they genuinely find delicious, knowing it might make some people gag? Or do you want everyone to bring potato chips? |
Originally Posted by Allaby (Post 2270670)
I respectfully disagree. I think extreme films should be eligible for general halls, if the person nominating it genuinely believes it is worthy. There are some great films that have content or themes that might be considered extreme or offensive to some people, but are still worthy of being nominated for a general hall, in my opinion.
|
Originally Posted by SpelingError (Post 2270674)
I remember several of us discussing a similar thing in the past. While I agreed with the general consensus we settled on that it's impossible to account for everything which may possibly trigger or offend someone, I do think we should make an effort to avoid nominating some films with obvious or common triggers, like unstimulated violence toward animals or underage nudity.
|
Originally Posted by Allaby (Post 2270675)
Those two types of content are wildly different though. Unsimulated violence towards animals is genuinely offensive, wrong, and harmful. Underage nudity, in my opinion, is not harmful or immoral and should not be offensive, although some people are, for whatever reason, offended by it. Not trying to offend anyone here, but that is my honest opinion on it.
|
LOL you guys are really tempting me to ruin your days with a nomination.
|
Re: The 27th General Hall of Fame
It is all a bit of a tightrope walk but it is one we all walk together and the success of that does come down to having these conversations and expressing our views.
At the end of it all, General, in my experience has been both amazing and grueling and has allowed me to venture into places I wouldn't on my own. Some I'd rather have not, ever, but it doesn't lower their cinematic value and it does allow me the opportunity to get thrown in the deep end of film experiences and thereby grow, cinema-wise. Not to mention the payoff for the discovery of films I have come to love and respect or just simply needed to see and finally have, easily surpassed the ones I could have done without. |
Originally Posted by Siddon (Post 2270679)
LOL you guys are really tempting me to ruin your days with a nomination.
|
Originally Posted by Takoma11 (Post 2270672)
It comes down to whether you mean what you say about people nominating things they love and think that some others may really like. Like I said in the thread at the time, I was as disturbed by the child abuse in Antwone Fisher as what happened in In a Glass Cage. Moreso, honestly, because it was a thing happening to a real person and not part of a larger allegory.
EDIT: actually, scratch that. I seem to remember being more disturbed by the depiction in Glass Cage. |
If I do join, maybe I'll hold off on the incest film. This time.
|
I think people need to realize that participating in a Hall of Fame means you risk having to watch movies that make you uncomfortable and this is especially true when you join a general HOF. People trying to restrict what is and is not allowed is what led to my first hiatus from the HOF.
That said, any nomination that contains actual animal cruelty or that contains exploitative child nudity will get an automatic last place on my ballot. |
Originally Posted by edarsenal (Post 2270664)
Secondly, and equally important:
WELCOME BACK MISS VICKY!!!! https://thumbs.gfycat.com/AgonizingD...ow-max-1mb.gif |
Originally Posted by Miss Vicky (Post 2270689)
TESTIFY, girlfriend!! |
Originally Posted by cricket (Post 2270685)
If I do join, maybe I'll hold off on the incest film. This time.
;) |
Originally Posted by Miss Vicky (Post 2270686)
I think people need to realize that participating in a Hall of Fame means you risk having to watch movies that make you uncomfortable and this is especially true when you join a general HOF. People trying to restrict what is and is not allowed is what led to my first hiatus from the HOF.
That said, any nomination that contains actual animal cruelty or that contains exploitative child nudity will get an automatic last place on my ballot. Regardless, though we haven't interacted a lot on this forum yet, glad to see you re-joining these Halls! |
Originally Posted by SpelingError (Post 2270697)
Regardless, though we haven't interacted a lot on this forum yet, glad to see you re-joining these Halls!
|
Originally Posted by Miss Vicky (Post 2270699)
Well, you might not be so glad I'm back once I start actually reviewing the movies. Raul once called it the "Miss Vicky Hate Parade." :D
|
Originally Posted by Wyldesyde19 (Post 2270683)
This kind of stuff never bothers me because it’s not actually happening, although I do note it as a disturbing scene. Wether it’s a allegory or not, though, I’m not going to rationalize one as more disturbing than the other.
EDIT: actually, scratch that. I seem to remember being more disturbed by the depiction in Glass Cage. My point was partly that for some people (me included) something being more graphic doesn't automatically equate to it being more disturbing. But as a very sensitive soul myself, I have a lot of sympathy for people who don't want to watch things that cross their personal sense of "too much." I really, REALLY get it. |
Re: The 27th General Hall of Fame
I nominated a pretty well-known, respected a film. But I love when something off the wall gets nominated. I wish more foreign films and more horror films got nominated. I think, say, Texas Chain Saw Massacre is better than most of the films that have won general hofs, but rarely does horror get nominated. I hate the idea of relegating it to only being nominated in its own category, because last I checked, it's also a film, so would fit in a film hall of fame.
|
Re: The 27th General Hall of Fame
Sorry for the ruffled feathers. Hopefully we can move forward and have a fun time.
|
Re: The 27th General Hall of Fame
By the way, as somebody who has been watching the thread and not really responding. I don't think this has gotten all that dramatic. It's good to get your feelings out there.
|
Also if anybody wants to PM me their nominations so I can start
|
Originally Posted by SpelingError (Post 2270700)
I better change my nomination to Quills then.
Just, you know, maybe don't pick something like Bringing Up Baby or The Music Man. |
Re: The 27th General Hall of Fame
Changing my nom to The Music Man, Ed did you get that;)
nah I'll stick with my nom, it's a well respected 4 hour long musical:cool: |
Originally Posted by Miss Vicky (Post 2270715)
I've nominated it twice already. :D
Just, you know, maybe don't pick something like Bringing Up Baby or The Music Man. *begins to sweat* |
I wish people would talk about and post short lists for feedback.
Part of me really wants to ruin your lives by introducing you guys to Allan King and his documentaries. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pqff0fONb3w |
Originally Posted by Siddon (Post 2270721)
I wish people would talk about and post short lists for feedback.
Part of me really wants to ruin your lives by introducing you guys to Allan King and his documentaries. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfXBhfM8ga0 |
Originally Posted by Citizen Rules (Post 2270718)
Changing my nom to The Music Man, Ed did you get that;)
Originally Posted by Miss Vicky (Post 2042091)
If I believed in hell, I imagine it would be something like having to sit through this movie again.
|
Re: The 27th General Hall of Fame
I'll change my nomination to Themroc Returns.
|
Originally Posted by SpelingError (Post 2270726)
I'll change my nomination to Themroc Returns.
|
(enters thread while humming "Gary, Indiana")
You need to look for Themroc 2: The Brick Stops Here. |
Re: The 27th General Hall of Fame
Themroc, or the 120 Days of Cavemen
|
Originally Posted by SpelingError (Post 2270735)
Themroc, or the 120 Days of Cavemen
|
Originally Posted by Takoma11 (Post 2270736)
I thought we agreed no miniseries!
|
Re: The 27th General Hall of Fame
There is no god, only Themroc
|
Re: The 27th General Hall of Fame
I really need to see Themroc
|
In Themroc we trust.
|
Re: The 27th General Hall of Fame
damn, you can still hear the echoes of my boy's primal screams through each new hall. so beautiful <3
|
|
Re: The 27th General Hall of Fame
I'll consider it.
|
I've made my selection....today I woke up and choose violence
https://cdn.twibooru.org/img/2020/7/9/10892/full.gif |
Re: The 27th General Hall of Fame
Battling with myself on a potential pick.
|
Betcha y'all having a nice day...be a real shame if something were to happen to that nice day you got going for ya
https://i.gifer.com/2Ej7.gif |
Originally Posted by Siddon (Post 2270721)
Part of me really wants to ruin your lives by introducing you guys to Allan King and his documentaries.
What this HoF clearly needs is some Dying at Grace. |
Originally Posted by crumbsroom (Post 2270999)
What this HoF clearly needs is some Dying at Grace.
Yeah I thought about that but I decided to go in a much darker direction. I actually have a gif of Ed opening up his pm... https://img.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeed-st...09303389-2.gif |
Originally Posted by Siddon (Post 2271011)
I decided to go in a much darker direction.
Good Lord. |
| All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:51 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright, ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © Movie Forums