More EU Madness!

They're coming to get you, Barbara!

I thought I answered your question directly and clearly. It is your responses that seem puzzling to me. I often literally can’t follow your train of thought, such as it is. You really ought to read Ann Coulter’s How to Talk to a Liberal (if you Must). She notes that one often thinks one is talking about one thing, and then the liberal brings up something entirely different.

I know. You already told me you're incredulous.

And back to the op - this has what to do with vax?

And thanks for the recommendation but you've already shown more than once your recommendations are not appreciated.

Oooh! Bad move, Don. Mentioning Ann Coulter on this thread?
That's like cutting yourself with a blade 100 times then jumping into a pool full of hungry piranha!

Wplains, do you know who agrees with you? Of all people, the Dali Lama, the darling of left wing New Agers! Imagine that. How disillusioning it must be for them!

Oops, again! All thumbs!

That's pure conjecture put forth to support a personal viewpoint. What real evidence do you have that there was a 'real goal' to form 'globalism' as you call it.

The world is always changing, and mass communications and mass transport are two big factors in a more unified global economy. I see no evidence that there was a past European collusion to bring that about. It's cultural evolution that brings about those changes. And with the internet those changes will be accelerated.

Which means 80% of Birmingham isn't Muslim. See how different that sounds based on how one words it?

Wow.

Trump is his own man, even his detractors say so. And that's what his supporters claim to like about him. So...when he makes a decision you don't approve of, he's not responsible? but his administration is?


Europe is a much better ally to the USA than organized crime controlled Russia. In Russia, political opposition and critics in the press end up dead under mysterious circumstances.

How many refugees has your country taken in?

Then why did John Major deny it was ever a secret plan?

When an appeals court in The Netherlands actually ruled that a political party had the right to form as a pro-pedophilia one, Putin responded: “And we’re supposed to accept this?”

(Yes, the decision was later reversed by their supreme court, but the mere fact that these judges were not instantly removed from office is telling; how far down the road to Sodom and Gomorrah have traversed these decadent people. Later, this group put up a photo of the king’s then adolescent son on their website. Then they went too far!)

I find a politician (Putin) with such an attitude a damn sight more preferable than these jurists and their people who tolerate them. Putin has now renounced atheism and is a devout Russian Orthodox congregant.

Well what a spooky coincidence. Just came up on my feed.

https://dailyhealthpost.com/hpv-vaccine-controversy/

Hmm, but I'll bet pro Nazi parties are not allowed? It makes no sense to me how come Nazis are banned while extreme leftist parties like Maoist and Communists are allowed. Yet, their heroes probably killed several more million people than the Nazis. Not that I want Nazi parties around but then neither do I want extremists like Maoists and the like. Yet, while some are banned the others are not only tolested but perfectly legal. Where is the logic in that?

As is being a liberal pinhead.

Lol.

It seems the next Civil War won't be North vs South, but rather Left vs Right.

More like Centre-Right vs. Right

The area of London that you used to live in? Did you move out along with all your other oh so tolerant, politically correct, indigenous British rendering your own capital city minority indigenous British in the process?

We have the same phenomenon here. Denizens of “blue" (liberal) states flee their socialist, liberal paradises for “reactionary,” ”red" (conservative) states and, unfortunately—learning nothing—, all too often take their blue state, left wing politics with them so they can begin the process anew of ruining their new state. What a bunch of fools and hypocrites “progressives” are.

Fortunately, this has begun to backfire on them. They gained Virginia, Nevada and Colorado by a narrow margin due to the liberal influx but in the process lost Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin to the now small conservative majority they left behind. This is what put Trump into office.

This is a great example of the difference between talking to people, and talking at them. Someone mentions they used to live in an area, and after a fig leaf of a rhetorical question, and before waiting for a reply, it's used as a launching pad for the exact same thing you've posted half a dozen times already. It's like you're scanning the discussion for excuses and entry points to repeat your position, rather than trying to have an actual discussion with anyone.

None of which, however, has any bearing one way or the other on the validity of what I wrote.

But many other responses have had bearing on it, and you've effectively shrugged them off. I pointed out that your statements about America's founders are in direct contradiction to what they actually wrote in our founding documents, and you wanted to "agree to disagree." christine responded to much of what you wrote to her, and you said "time will tell."

It is perfectly relevant to point out, then, that you're not actually soliciting comments on the "validity of what [you] wrote." You're just interested in broadcasting it as often as possible. And if you're just going to broadcast it yet again (particularly via some obviously forced segue or interjection), then I'm just going to point out, yet again, that it's not a real invitation to discussion.