By the time I finished Dancer in the Dark, I had symptoms simillar to sea sickness.
Hey Lars, use a tripod the next time.
This is just one example among countless others.
What are these directors trying to achieve?
Are they attempting to make it look like a documentary film?
Or is the camera suppose to represent a third person?
A voyeur?
Even if enjoy the subject of the movie, I can't get pass the camera technique.
Better put, lack of technique.
I think films from this period look silly and dated.
Just like the late sixties-early seventies movies with the irritating multiple image format.
Enough with the shaky cam.
Hey Lars, use a tripod the next time.
This is just one example among countless others.
What are these directors trying to achieve?
Are they attempting to make it look like a documentary film?
Or is the camera suppose to represent a third person?
A voyeur?
Even if enjoy the subject of the movie, I can't get pass the camera technique.
Better put, lack of technique.
I think films from this period look silly and dated.
Just like the late sixties-early seventies movies with the irritating multiple image format.
Enough with the shaky cam.