Delila's Reviews

→ in
Tools    





The People's Republic of Clogher
Originally Posted by SamsoniteDelilah
tell me if I'm nutty, but I think Bale should get an award for this.
Slimmer of the year? Sorry.

I didn't find much in The Machinist worthy of such praise, I'm afraid. It's well shot and Bale's performance is strong but nothing grabbed me and said "That's clever" or "That's original".

Maybe I was in the wrong frame of mind though as I double rented this with Kinsey (which I watched first). The dvd I rented had no extras either, sometimes a commentary track (like you had) is useful.
__________________
"Critics are like eunuchs in a harem; they know how the Tatty 100 is done, they've seen it done every day, but they're unable to do it themselves." - Brendan Behan



I am having a nervous breakdance
Nice review, Sammy. I've been looking at this one in the rental store a few times wondering what kind of film it might be and if it would be worth the money. Maybe I'll give it a go...
__________________
The novelist does not long to see the lion eat grass. He realizes that one and the same God created the wolf and the lamb, then smiled, "seeing that his work was good".

--------

They had temporarily escaped the factories, the warehouses, the slaughterhouses, the car washes - they'd be back in captivity the next day but
now they were out - they were wild with freedom. They weren't thinking about the slavery of poverty. Or the slavery of welfare and food stamps. The rest of us would be all right until the poor learned how to make atom bombs in their basements.



Standing in the Sunlight, Laughing
Originally Posted by Tacitus
Slimmer of the year? Sorry.

I didn't find much in The Machinist worthy of such praise, I'm afraid. It's well shot and Bale's performance is strong but nothing grabbed me and said "That's clever" or "That's original".

Maybe I was in the wrong frame of mind though as I double rented this with Kinsey (which I watched first). The dvd I rented had no extras either, sometimes a commentary track (like you had) is useful.
I double rented The Machinist with 21 Grams, which I watched first, and which handles many of the same issues. Anderson's offering does so with a MUCH clearer point, IMO, and more emotional impact because it isn't so busy trying to keep the viewer confused all the damn time.



Pidzilla~ I'm considering buying a copy, and my DVD collection is still under 20 titles I think. I'm trying to wait til the price comes down a little, but amazon is calling my name.
__________________
Review: Cabin in the Woods 8/10



The People's Republic of Clogher
Originally Posted by SamsoniteDelilah
I double rented The Machinist with 21 Grams, which I watched first, and which handles many of the same issues. Anderson's offering does so with a MUCH clearer point, IMO, and more emotional impact because it isn't so busy trying to keep the viewer confused all the damn time.
hmmmm I wasn't overly keen on 21 Grams either. Out of the two I'd prefer Anderson's movie though.



I'd much prefer 21 Grams meself. Different tastes I suppose - but interested to see what issues you thought were the same Sam cos I wouldn't have thought of those two films in the same breath?



Standing in the Sunlight, Laughing
Originally Posted by christine
I'd much prefer 21 Grams meself. Different tastes I suppose - but interested to see what issues you thought were the same Sam cos I wouldn't have thought of those two films in the same breath?
Similarities between them would be:
Telling the story in non-sequential bits and pieces
Sustaining a dreamlike sense of confusion
Similar palette and graininess of the film
Similar emotional tone
plotwise:
WARNING: "21g + Machinist" spoilers below
Both feature a main character who has to decide what to do after a hit and run accident in which people died, his grappling with his own guilt, with the same result: both turn themselves in, and both films explore the lives of the loved ones who survive the hit-and-run victim(s).


I probably wouldn't have noticed how similar they are, had I not watched one right after the other. They are more dissimilar than similar, but yeah I think they have some important common ground.



Standing in the Sunlight, Laughing
Brad Anderson is a pretty cool director. This makes two of his films I've seen (and an ep of The Wire that blew my mind) and really enjoyed, though The Machinist is much more cohesive and satisfying.

Session 9 is also a psychological thriller. It's the creepy tale of
monsterzine
a haz-mat team who accept the challenge of de-toxifying an insane asylum that has been abandoned lo' these 15 years. The setting is awesome and offers opportunities for really creepy sub-plot points and some good scares. Unfortunately, the plot is a bit choppy (no pun intended) and the main subplot adds to the build of tension but doesn't significantly associate with anything else, otherwise. In fact, there are several red herrings here and none of them offers more than a brief distraction from a fairly thin plot.

The other elements, however, combine to make this a fun film to watch. The score is very effective. The photography has that bump in contrast that appears to be common in Anderson's work, and that promises that whatever grisly fate comes our way, we'll see it in stark detail. This ups the ante nicely for the viewer. Acting is fairly good across the board, despite the presence of David Caruso. And the ending will pin you to your seat, if not shock you.

It's not a brilliant film, and it could have been better with a few changes. These characters, despite a wicked deadline, spend a lot of time hanging around, but they never crack any jokes. I am still wondering
WARNING: "Session 9" spoilers below
why Caruso's character lied about Hank leaving town, if he had nothing to do with Hank's lobotomy
. : \ If you're looking for a creepy thriller though, Session 9 delivers. 3/5



Excellent review. I LIKE YO' STYLE LADY!
__________________
MOVIE TITLE JUMBLE
New jumble is two words: balesdaewrd
Previous jumble goes to, Mrs. Darcy! (gdknmoifoaneevh - Kingdom of Heaven)
The individual words are jumbled then the spaces are removed. PM the answer to me. First one with the answer wins.



28 days...6 hours...42 minutes...12 seconds
The only thing that took me out of the atmosphere in this film, is the fact they decided to shoot it on digital, it looked to crisp in picture quality for those creepy thrillers. It needed a more grainy film style to get more chills into you, although I did enjoy this great film.

Great review!
__________________
"A laugh can be a very powerful thing. Why, sometimes in life, it's the only weapon we have."

Suspect's Reviews



Sir Sean Connery's love-child
Have seen it around, but never really thought about renting it. Now that you've recommended it, I'll check it out, also noticed Peter Mullan is in it, got to support my fellow Scots!!!
Have you seen " My Little Eye "?
A creepy little thriller shot on digital, it revolves around a reality tv show, but I'm not saying any more! Might do a review on my thread sometime soon.
Will let you know my thoughts, once I've seen it, cheers C.
__________________
Hey Pepe, would you say I have a plethora of presents?


Toga, toga, toga......


Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbour?



Great reviews Sammy D... thanks...
__________________
You never know what is enough, until you know what is more than enough.
~William Blake ~

AiSv Nv wa do hi ya do...
(Walk in Peace)




Standing in the Sunlight, Laughing
When it works, it really works, and the rest of the time, it's crap. Dark Blue is a good cop/bad cop story set in LA in the days leading up to the Rodney King verdict.
darkblue
The racial issues are mostly set-dressing for a really standard story of a police officer who has to make the choice between respecting the law and "getting the job done'. LA Confidential presents this conflict more clearly and with prettier peripherals.

Part of the problem here is that the story has one strong character and the cast seems to have one strong actor. Kurt Russell turns in a solid performance as the cop who's taken the darker path, but wants to come clean in the end. He tackles this conflict well, but outside of this, his character is one-dimensional and so is everybody else. The one exception to this is an actor who gets about 5 minutes total screen time, played by a person who calls himself "Kurupt". In real life. (aka "Young Gotti") Here's hoping he gets a real name, because the guy has potential.

The main value of this film for a viewer is as a mark to shoot above. It's interesting enough to hold you, but doesn't deliver much for your time. 2/5



Arresting your development
Originally Posted by Tacitus
Top work as per usual.
She is something...
__________________
Our real discoveries come from chaos, from going to the place that looks wrong and stupid and foolish.
Embrace the chaos and sour adversity, for wise men say it is the wisest course.