when I finally watched The Sixth Sense, the rest of the movie was so good it forced me to reevaluate his entire filmography. I don't think he's ever made anything as good again
Again, a long time since I saw it but I thought Unbreakable was better.
This is kinda sorta where I stand with The Sixth Sense. Saw it in theaters back in the day, guessed the twist halfway through, and was left underwhelmed by the end. More power to those that experienced the whole *gasp* thing, but it just wasn't me. I haven't felt like revisiting it ever, even though I've thought about giving it that second chance. Meh.
Whether you'll get anything from it or not I don't know, but I did enjoy that second watch seeing the clues I didn't/hadn't picked up on first time around. Also, it is just a good film which doesn't need 'the twist' to work, IMO.
I'll also say I'm a little surprised by how often it's refered to as a horror movie. I'm not saying it isn't, but it never felt like one to me and I don't remember it being sold that way here either.
BTW, that girl was played by Misca Barton (most famous for TV's The O.C.).
Not in my house, in my house she's most famous for a guest slot in the Neighbours renewal.

Sadly, she wasn't very good.
I like almost all of Shyamalan's films and like @
Captain Quint and his Ellery Queen explanation, I try to go into a movie I'm interested in without knowing a whole lot about it. I don't want to know the twist,
if there is one, or how it ends. And I never guess the end.
For me, knowing there's a twist is almost worst than knowing it. In some cases I think I'd rather know it once I know there is one, just so I can enjoy the film without trying to suss it out (I have to do it, it's how my mind works

), thankfully I've seen enough films to read what's onscreen, so I'll usually get it as soon as the first or second clue arrives (depending on how well intergrated into the plot they are) but knowing there is one is enough. Sadly, people usually tell you but add, don't worry, I won't spoil it for you though. Yeah, you already have.
I think Scream 2 had good potential, what with all the "sequel tropes" they could explore, but it kinda sucked. Scream 3 was a bit better, but watching them back-to-back I got too burnt out to watch the fourth one.
I agree about the missed potential of Scream 2, but it's still a good ride and I enjoyed it a lot. A lot more than Scream 3, actually, which really felt like one too many at the time.
I haven't seen many Scorsese films, but for one of the most beloved directors of all time, his movies are ****ING BORING.
I read this and thought you'd gotten confused and meant Kubrick. Then you mentioned the films and you didn't.
Without Scream, The Cabin In The Woods may never have happened....
So what you're saying is, there's always a down side?
Another from my list with Scream, which I had at #8 but probably could be anywhere from 4-10 on another day.
So, I start hearing about this film which has hit really big in the States and started making waves here. It's a horror. Tick. It's directed by Wes Craven. Big tick, ok I'll definitely see this when it gets here. It stars Drew Barrymore!?!??!? I'm already there, Obviously it took months for it to get here (it was like that back then) but eventually I was able to see it and I loved it. Absolutely, completely and totally loved it (except the end of that scene which, thankfully, I already knew about but still wasn't prepared for that sight and it still hits me, though not like it did the first time on a 30 foot screen or however big it was) and that love hasn't diminished. I still love it. Not only that, but I still love to watch it. I just enjoy looking at it almost as much as I do watching the film. It's fun and I think it's more scary than it is funny. Maybe those coming to it later feel it the other way around or find it really cheesy or something, but that wasn't the overriding feeling at the time. This was a fun, scary horror film that played with the genre with a nod and a wink to the audience, while still putting on a really good show for those who 'didn't get it'.
Also, I have no idea who she is, but the girl who sat next to me in that first cinema viewing also added to that first great experience by screaming and curling up in a ball on her seat, clinging to (what I assume) was her boyfriend of the time. As someone who's only been scared by horror films a couple of times (and not since childhood) it was great to be so close to that reaction and have that added soundtrack to my experience.
I also saw Casino at the cinema (sadly a much smaller screen. Too small for the film really) and was equally desperate to see it (Scorsese, De Niro et al and gangsters?) and throughly enjoyed it. It was the first time I'd ever been to a film with an intermission too, although the numbness in my bum by the end wouldn't speak to that fact. A great film, but again, one I've only seen a couple of times, in part, due to its length. I did think about it for my list, but it fell away for the same reasons as so many others.