By IMDb, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=22381511
Father of the Bride - (1991)
Specifically, the upper middle class
Father of the Bride who can afford a $100,000 wedding, and invite 500 people to the ceremony and reception. Yes, I was just as shocked as George Banks (Steve Martin) when it was revealed the wedding cake would cost $1200 - even though I kind of get it. This 1991 remake isn't as funny as the original overall, although it has some very funny moments - it keeps hovering between drama and comedy. Steve Martin and Spencer Tracy play the father part very differently - with Martin very much externalizing his anguish and displeasure with his daughter getting married. He's that type of comedian - Tracy was way more subtle. That's not a bad thing though. It's a very light affair - anyone can watch this, and it simply plays on familial connection, growing up, change and love. If
Cape Fear or
Terminator 2 were too violent for you, there was this option at multiplexes. My biggest fault with it is the guilt most people were going to walk away feeling, not able to splash a ridiculous amount of money around for their daughter's big day. Martin shines like a beacon, however, and he's just too damned likeable to not make this film worth seeing at least once.
6/10
Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=7542016
Father of the Bride Part II - (1995)
I thought we were going to get a remake of
Father's Little Dividend here, but
Father of the Bride Part II goes in a different direction. When Annie (Kimberly Williams) - the daughter of George Banks (Steve Martin) announces she's pregnant, George's wife Nina (Diane Keaton) finds out she's also expecting. Keaton was 49 when she took on this project - so it's a definite surprise to me, because I went into this blind. From there on it's mostly predictable - the screenplay plods along, but Steve Martin and Martin Short are both wonderful performers here. I don't think the first film really needed a sequel - and without actually including the kid like the 1951 film does, there's a slight lack of focus. A few sporadic sparks aren't enough to make this film memorable or worth recommending.
5/10
By May be found at the following website: http://www.impawards.com/1995/powder.html, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=8345633
Powder - (1995)
Oh
Powder - I threw this on without knowing anything about it, including it's director, Victor Salva. The way it started off, it was really interesting, and had a slew of big-name talent in supporting roles : Mary Steenburgen, Lance Henriksen and Jeff Goldblum feature prominently. It's about an albino kid, Jeremy Reed (Sean Patrick Flanery), whose grandfather dies with him never having left his house before - leaving him alone in the world. When Jeremy gets taken to a boy's home and normal school, you know this kid is going to get bullied - but what we don't know about is the varied incredible powers he has. In it's second half, the film deals really heavily in schmaltz - with far too many heart-rending speeches set to rising orchestral music. It feels trite - and it was a shame because I liked a few of the factors here. Then I go look this film up and see it getting smashed because it's director, Salva, is a convicted paedophile. This was back in the day when people weren't cancelled, so after he got out of jail he just kept rolling along making movies.
Powder at times felt like a superhero origin story, at others an emotionally sentimental sugary drama, but in the end I had to deal with a lot of disappointment regarding the way it played out.
5/10