Rate The Last Movie You Saw

Tools    





CITIZEN KANE (1941)
A debut film

I've seen/heard a bunch of "making of" featurettes and commentaries, but I've never heard the Ebert one, so I'm gonna try to sneak that in tonight.

Grade:
Checked this out yesterday and it was pretty darn great.
__________________
Check out my podcast: The Movie Loot!



28 days...6 hours...42 minutes...12 seconds
Great film. I love George C. Scott's performance.
They do look alike, don't they.
__________________
"A laugh can be a very powerful thing. Why, sometimes in life, it's the only weapon we have."

Suspect's Reviews





Very good true story movie. KK really good.
__________________
I’m here only on Mondays, Wednesdays & Fridays. That’s why I’m here now.




Dawn of the Dead (1978, George A. Romero)


Night of the Living Dead is still my favorite of the trilogy but Dawn is a stone cold classic as well (I was never a big fan of Day of the Dead).
Dawn may not be perfect, and the zombies may look silly, but this movie is just so damn enjoyable I really don't care.
Yeah, I liked this, it had an other-worldly quality....you're right, the zombies look like town centres these days - just more denim back then!!!



They do look alike, don't they.
George C. Scott plays the Lee J. Cobb role in the 1997 HBO remake. Not to be pedantic or anything.
LOL, sorry. I was referring to Cobb, but I've seen both and I suppose that's why I got them mixed up



In a stunning turn of events, I now have a strong desire to watch Dirty Dancing. This is not what I expected from my Tuesday evening.
You're welcome!

I think that's the difference. I really cared for Mark Duplass' character and his love for Sarah Paulson's character. I could feel his pain and heartbreak and regret at what happenned.
I could also feel for him on some level. But there's also the fact that he
WARNING: spoilers below
wanted to make the abortion all about him and his feelings and it annoyed me a bit that it had to get so close to the ending before he took a step back from it. Like, if he has been thinking and obsessing on this event for 20 years, why is it only after she gives him a speech that he can apologize for being flippant about it? I don't mind the emotional journey, but the pacing of it felt off. It seemed like all of the emotional work was done right at the very end in a rush.



I've decided to start a list of all the movies I'll watch in 2021.

Murphy's Romance - This was picked by someone else. I wouldn't have bothered otherwise. For starters it's a chick flick. Not that there's anything wrong with romcoms but they're usually not my cup of tea. There's been good ones I've seen like Two Weeks Notice with Sandra Bullock and Hugh Grant.

This one had one thing going for it and that's James Garner. It's hard to think of a more likable actor than the late Mr. Garner. This also stars Sally Field and I consider her a mixed bag as an actress. She's good in the right role such as Places in the Heart but here she isn't required to do much more than go through her usual spunky heroine paces. Another thing that got to me was the saxophone soundtrack. Just like seemingly every other 80's movie it had David Sanborn blowing away in the background. I didn't think it jibed with the Southwestern surroundings and every time there was a scene break or respite from the action it took me out of the moment. I don't think there's much to recommend this other than James Garner unless you're also a Field fan. 65/100





Reversal of Fortune, 1990

Claus von Bulow(Jeremy Irons) is convicted of the attempted murder of his millionaire wife, Sunny (Glenn Close), after she falls into a permanent coma. Hoping he might be able to mount an appeal, von Bulow hires Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz (Ron Silver), who in turn enlists half a dozen of his student to meticulously comb through the evidence in hope of overturning the conviction.

I had a mixed response to this film--a story that seemed at many times to want to have its cake and eat it, too.

Something that the film (based on a book by Dershowitz) constantly tries to emphasize is that this is not about money, it is about justice. Many of Dershowitz's students believe Claus to be guilty (for many different reasons), and Dershowitz makes an impassioned speech at the beginning of the film about the need to set precedent and hold the system of law to a high standard, whether the client is innocent or guilty and no matter their wealth or social status. Throughout the film we are given glimpses of another case Dershowitz is fighting, in which two young Black men in Alabama are set to be executed for a crime that they did not commit.

But despite this . . . I was not 100% sold. As noble as the intentions might be, we still have a millionaire bankrolling some of the best legal minds in the country to get him released from a conviction. The film frequently portrays Claus as a man who may be guilty--though Dershowitz repeatedly says that, despite himself, he believes in Claus's innocence--and watching him swan around on a yacht with a woman young enough to be his daughter while his wife is in a coma makes it hard to be invested in his freedom.

There is some satisfaction to be gained from watching the way that Dershowitz's team dismantles the various pieces of evidence put forward by the prosecution. This is almost a lose-lose situation: a millionaire creep vs a corrupt investigation/prosecution. And I totally get that defeating the corrupt system of law is much more important than one man's conviction or freedom.

I don't suppose it helps that one of Dershowitz's highest profile cases involves helping Jeffrey Epstein escape sex trafficking charges all the way back in 2008. I'm all for fighting the system when the system is unjust, but I think there's a difference between fighting corruption and using a ton of money to get brilliant minds to find you loopholes to escape consequences for your actions. Ron Silver's performance as Dershowitz is very likable (and a much needed counterbalance to Irons' odd and callous Claus), but I couldn't help feeling that the movie was using his charisma to gloss over the fact that the team might be freeing a man who tried to murder his wife (and maybe for all intents and purposes did).

It's an interesting courtroom/legal journey, and the film does a really good job of pushing the concept of perspective and possibly lying. Unlike many biographies that present scenes as if they are objectively observed, there is an emphasis in this film on the idea that we are seeing what someone is alleging is true. And there is often another character around to pipe in that there is another possible/plausible sequence of events. Glenn Close, as Sunny, narrates the film from her coma, really driving home that the real events of those weeks will never be known.

A good film with solid performances, but frustrating in the way that it ties Claus's specific case to the concept of judicial rigor.




I watched Run earlier today. Smart, little thriller from the guys that made the thoroughly enjoyable Searching. I think the key word here is little. A simple concept, with limited options to explore and yet told well. Unsurprisingly reminded me of Misery a lot.



Please Quote/Tag Or I'll Miss Your Responses
The story is a bit straight forward and predictable, no twist but just about how he interacted with people and him getting back with his brother. The movie does not show us their relationship but it tell us that, and honestly the payoff is fine.

I think it holds up well, because after Elephant Men he proved that he can actually tell simple stories without twists and turns or weird characters/storylines etc.

I liked this movie, but it clearly was VERY influenced by "Harry and Tonto" - so many similarities.



[12 Angry Men] Great film. I love George C. Scott's performance.
Are you thinking of Anatomy of a Murder? Or if you're remembering 12 Angry Men, perhaps you're thinking of Lee J. Cobb.

Both good films, both great actors.



George C. Scott plays the Lee J. Cobb role in the 1997 HBO remake. Not to be pedantic or anything.
Aha! I don't believe I ever saw that version. That must be what Thief was referring to.



Lee J. Cobb and George C. Scott also play the same role of Kinderman in Exorcist and Exorcist 3 respectively. They're out to confuse a fella!



Vertigo - Rewatched this 1958 Hitchcock classic with Jimmy Stewart and Kim Novak. It's a hard movie to peg being equal parts mystery and sexual obsession as well as a treatise on loneliness and unrequited love. Stewart's character of ex-police detective John 'Scottie' Ferguson also has acrophobia and a traumatic failure that led to his current circumstances. He's hired by an old college friend Gavin Elster to shadow his wife Madeline, who's been behaving erratically and is apparently convinced that she's the reincarnated personification of Carlotta Valdes, her great grandmother. Ferguson becomes obsessed with this particular Hitchcock blonde and, this being one of his movies, things aren't as they seem at any given moment. This isn't a clear cut thriller by any means so those expecting a neat resolution or a tidy narrative might end up disappointed. 90/100



Victim of The Night


Dirty Dancing, 1987

Despite a slew of pop culture saturated imagery and lines of dialogue, I've never had a strong interest in Dirty Dancing. I think that part of that comes from being frequently let down by the 80s comedies I'm "supposed" to enjoy (things like Sixteen Candles).

Then a few months ago I read a review of the film (HERE) that really got me interested. In particular it was this quote from the woman who wrote the film's script: "It’s a love story but it’s also about honor. If you reach out your hand and behave with honor, at some point the world will turn on its axis.”

I am quite happy to say that the film not only lived up to my interest, it exceeded it.

Baby (Jennifer Grey) is on vacation in the early 60s with her family (including her father, played by Jerry Orbach) to an upscale resort. On the eve of heading off to college, Baby wants to change the world but lacks much real world experience. Enter Johnny (Patrick Swayze), a dance instructor at the resort. As Baby gets to know not only Johnny but several of the other staff members, she begins to rethink her understanding of the world and the people she knows.

The best decision that the film makes is in choosing a single compelling dynamic: have and have-not. While the film delivers glancing lines and nods at other issues (the Civil Rights movement, women's rights), it centers the concept of power. And I liked this a lot because the nature of power shifts over time, but the way that those with power treat those who don't doesn't change. Those with more money and resources will always demand a degree of servility, compliance, and emotional labor from those with less. Making Baby a character who cares about doing the right thing (as opposed to having a single pet issue) gives the film a timeless element. This movie could, with very little difference, have taken place now.

I guess Gray and Swayze notoriously had a tumultuous relationship during filming, but this is one of those magical times that the energy translates into chemistry that easily trips into passion. Maybe it helps that for every dance lesson montage there is a deep conversation between the characters.

I was also very taken by the film's treatment of its female characters. A lesser film would have made Penny (Johnny's gorgeous dance partner) Baby's rival. Instead, the two fall into a cautious friendship when Baby learns that Penny needs an abortion. Baby's sister, Lisa, is a source of comedy, but she is not cruel and the film itself does not treat her cruelly. In fact, the film reserves its ire for those who would abuse or mistreat others: the wealthy woman who pressures Johnny into sex, the handsome waiter who refuses to help pay for Penny's abortion. (Sidenote: was there ever a better shorthand for a character than the moment when Robbie hands Baby a well-worn copy of [i]The Fountainhead[i] and tells her that he expects her to return after reading because he has notes in the margin?). And while the film is not focused on women's rights, it effortlessly nails the kind of patronizing attitude that some people take toward women, and especially young women.

(I should note that the portrayal of characters who are respectful extends beyond the female characters. For example, the way that Johnny's cousin Billy--who initially likes Baby--level-headedly accepts that she likes Johnny instead and he and Baby are able to stay friends. The way that the film shows the development of a friend group is really great. The film is able to show that not all relationships have to be about romance or sex. Likewise, despite having to do some growing of his own, Baby's father is seen as a caring father and man, including very kind treatment of Penny after her abortion goes wrong.)

And the dance scenes themselves? Yes, there is some cheese. But the filmmakers' decision to include footage of Swayze and Gray warming up (the notorious crawling toward each other moment), messing around, or messing up adds a playfulness and genuine sexiness that is often absent from overly-choreographed dance sequences. The film manages to make a compelling case for dancing as both a means of sexual awakening and self-expression. It is a real credit to Gray the way that she can make a single shoulder shrug or arm flutter convey so much inner emotion.

I have nothing critical to say about this film. I think that it both operates within and moves beyond the boundaries of a romantic comedy. Its IMDb score of 7/10 is absurd (and, ugh, of course a bunch of dudes are dragging its score down). Of all the 80s coming-of-age films that have been sold to me over the years, this one is definitely the keeper. If you haven't seen this film, get on it stat.

On the one hand, I can't believe you've never seen Dirty Dancing.
On the other, I'm glad you got it.
Dirty Dancing, honestly, is a little treasure in American Cinema.
I was 15 years old when I saw it in the theater. I did not want to go. Like all of my male friends, I went because my girlfriend wanted to see it and I was 15 years old and would do literally anything for the possibility that it would lead to sex.
Imagine my chagrin at having to work really hard to act like I wasn't utterly charmed by this film. Everything you've said about it is true. It is a film with a very deep heart and a genuine dedication to representing the feelings of its very real characters.
To my ultimate chagrin... for those of you who did not grow up in the 80s, adults and especially parents, were supposed to be somewhere on the spectrum between fools and villains, moreso than any time I've been able to track down in the 20th Century, at least as far as cinema is concerned... the father is my favorite character in the movie. Because he is wrong. And then he says, "When I'm wrong I say I'm wrong." Even now, that chokes me up because it is the moment that I realized that adults could have depth and be real thinking learning people instead of stupid aliens bent on ruining everything.
Honestly, it's not a movie I revisit often, but since 1988 I have never had a bad word to say about it, and at basically the age of the dad myself, I'm willing to champion it for its simple grace.



Victim of The Night
In a stunning turn of events, I now have a strong desire to watch Dirty Dancing. This is not what I expected from my Tuesday evening.
Please feel free to follow up on that desire. DD is kinda like the most sincere pumpkin patch in Peanutsland. It should be corny, but because it doesn't flinch at its own sincerity, it completely dodges that punch like some Zen master and delivers on being exactly the movie it should be.



Victim of The Night
I've decided to start a list of all the movies I'll watch in 2021.

Murphy's Romance - This was picked by someone else. I wouldn't have bothered otherwise. For starters it's a chick flick. Not that there's anything wrong with romcoms but they're usually not my cup of tea. There's been good ones I've seen like Two Weeks Notice with Sandra Bullock and Hugh Grant.

This one had one thing going for it and that's James Garner. It's hard to think of a more likable actor than the late Mr. Garner. This also stars Sally Field and I consider her a mixed bag as an actress. She's good in the right role such as Places in the Heart but here she isn't required to do much more than go through her usual spunky heroine paces. Another thing that got to me was the saxophone soundtrack. Just like seemingly every other 80's movie it had David Sanborn blowing away in the background. I didn't think it jibed with the Southwestern surroundings and every time there was a scene break or respite from the action it took me out of the moment. I don't think there's much to recommend this other than James Garner unless you're also a Field fan. 65/100
I liked this movie a lot when I was a teenager but I haven't seen it since.
I guess all I can say about it is... How do you like your eggs?