Martin Freeman Reacts to Outrage Over ‘Miller’s Girl’ 31-Year Age Gap

Tools    






Martin Freeman recently spoke to The Times of London about the backlash that erupted over his movie “Miller’s Girl” earlier this year. The erotic thriller opened in theaters in January and caused a stir on social media due to intimate scenes between Freeman and his co-star Jenna Ortega. The movie casts the “Wednesday” favorite as an 18-year-old student who is attracted to her writing teacher (Freeman) and attempts to start an affair with him. Freeman is 31 years older than Ortega.

While some viewers were disturbed by the age gap between the actors and how the film required them to shoot some intimate moments together, Freeman stressed to The Times that “Miller’s Girl” is “grown-up and nuanced.” He also argued that just because the film shows the makings of a potential affair starting between characters who are 31 years apart doesn’t mean it is condoning such behavior.

“It’s not saying, ‘Isn’t this great?’” Freeman said while calling it “a shame” how stories about difficult subject matters can often be tainted by public opinion. He then cited Liam Neeson in Steven Spielberg’s 1993 Holocaust drama “Schindler’s List” as an example of how taking on a role doesn’t necessarily mean an actor is automatically endorsing the subject matter.

“Are we going to have a go at Liam Neeson for being in a film about the Holocaust?” Freeman asked.

After “Miller’s Girl” opened in theaters, the Daily Mail published a viral interview with the movie’s intimacy coordinator Kristina Arjona. She stressed the actors were never put in an uncomfortable situation on set while filming the movie’s more racy scenes.

“There were many, many people throughout this process, engaging with (Jenna) to make sure that it was consistent with what she was comfortable with, and she was very determined and very sure of what she wanted to do,” Arjona said at the time, adding, “I’m hyper aware of both of my talent and making sure that we’re consistently checking in and that at no point are any of their boundaries being surpassed.”

Arjona added that she had many discussions on the “level of nudity” with Ortega and Freeman and said she spoke to them about “different variations of how they wanted to shoot these scenes so that audiences could watch them at test screenings to see what was too much.”

“Miller’s Girl” is now streaming on Netflix in North America.



I haven't seen the film, so I can't comment on whether the film handled the subject matter well, but in a larger context, I don't see anything inherently wrong about depicting pedophilia in film. It occurs in real life, so why can't it occur in fiction? Curious how much of the backlash is due to people not understanding "depiction doesn't equal endorsement".
__________________
IMDb
Letterboxd



I haven't seen the film, so I can't comment on whether the film handled the subject matter well, but in a larger context, I don't see anything inherently wrong about depicting pedophilia in film. It occurs in real life, so why can't it occur in fiction? Curious how much of the backlash is due to people not understanding "depiction doesn't equal endorsement".
Look, you really should see the film in order to criticize it more accurately.

I don't think the character Freeman plays is exactly a "pedophile", at least not in the sense people normally throw the word around, but that doesn't make the film any less icky.

I think part of what makes the film problematic is that it really tries to make Freeman's character too much of an innocent victim when, in a RL situation in this day and age, almost any grown man should know better when it comes to setting personal boundaries.



Look, you really should see the film in order to criticize it more accurately.

I don't think the character Freeman plays is exactly a "pedophile", at least not in the sense people normally throw the word around, but that doesn't make the film any less icky.

I think part of what makes the film problematic is that it really tries to make Freeman's character too much of an innocent victim when, in a RL situation in this day and age, almost any grown man should know better when it comes to setting personal boundaries.
Aye, that's an important bit of context then.

Anyways, my post wasn't intended as a defense of the film. I was just speaking in a larger context.



The trick is not minding
Even without seeing the film, as long as she is of age and consents, it isn’t anyone’s business about any age gap. I say this as someone who knows more than a few married couples with large age gaps, ranging from 10 years to a couple over 20 years.
One married her college professor after graduation, who was in his mid forties, (which did raise a few eyebrows over his job ethics, but I don’t recall if he was actually ever her teacher in a class or not). Over 20 years later, still married.
Anecdotal, sure, but not irrelevant either.



I think the film handled the subject matter in a tasteful way. Jenna Ortega does a good job, but as a film it is just okay, a 6/10 from me. It's not as salacious or as erotic as some might assume. This isn't the first film dealing with adult/teen relationships and there are other films that are more provocative or explicit in their content.



Hilarious. A film about two consenting adults causes a stir.
Yes, I'm sure the world would be a better place if high school teachers always had affairs with their students...



Even without seeing the film, as long as she is of age and consents, it isn’t anyone’s business about any age gap.
Glad someone said that. It might seem like an odd relationship to some but the world shouldn't be judging relationships between legal adults.


*Disclaimer, I have not seen the movie but I assume 18 is considered a legal adult in the place the events occur. Of course it's a misuse of trust for a teacher to have an affair with a student, and probably illegal depending on where the film takes place. But no fault of the film exploring those issues. Might be a good film.



I hope those who want the film cancelled also want The Simposns cancelled because there's an epsidoe where Lisa kills Sideshow Bob. And murder is bad.

Whole world has gone utterly mad.



I wonder if those who are outraged over this film are also outraged over older films with large age gaps? Have they seen The Debut (1977) or either version of Lolita?



Oh, wow, I guess nobody had thought of that until you pointed it out!



I wonder if those who are outraged over this film are also outraged over older films with large age gaps? Have they seen The Debut (1977) or either version of Lolita?
It's very possible that movies like those couldn't be made today.

Look, if you haven't seen the movie, or if you watched it and thought it was no big deal, I mean, there's nothing that I can really say. You do you.

If you have seen the movie and realize that what's being depicted isn't so much objectionable as the way the movie goes about setting up the situation... then maybe there is hope for you...



Sorry if I'm rude but I'm right
If it was about a mature woman romancing a student, the response would be that she's an empowered and brave woman who doesn't fear society's backlash and proudly relives her youth by getting what she wants after society as a whole thwarted her from success due to the hideous tentacles of patriarchy.

But it's the man who's older, so of course it's terrible and abusive and wrong and grooming.

Meanwhile, many 18-year-old real-life girls start doing hardcore porn and I don't hear quite as much outrage at that, even though it's real life, not a fictional story. Surely, if 18-year-old girls can engage in cyber prostitution, then they should be able to romance an older man, too?
__________________
Look, I'm not judging you - after all, I'm posting here myself, but maybe, just maybe, if you spent less time here and more time watching films, maybe, and I stress, maybe your taste would be of some value. Just a thought, ya know.



If it was about a mature woman romancing a student, the response would be that she's an empowered and brave woman who doesn't fear society's backlash and proudly relives her youth by getting what she wants after society as a whole thwarted her from success due to the hideous tentacles of patriarchy.

But it's the man who's older, so of course it's terrible and abusive and wrong and grooming.

Meanwhile, many 18-year-old real-life girls start doing hardcore porn and I don't hear quite as much outrage at that, even though it's real life, not a fictional story. Surely, if 18-year-old girls can engage in cyber prostitution, then they should be able to romance an older man, too?
If it was a good movie, with well-written characters, and a good story, then none of the other considerations would matter in the slightest.

I can't speak for those who feel the movie deserves "outrage" - for me, it just represents a missed opportunity to do something intelligent with the premise it embraces so eagerly but which it puts to such monumentally bad use.



Oh, wow, I guess nobody had thought of that until you pointed it out!
I don't really understand the sarcasm here. Your post contained only the idea that this relationship would be bad if it happened in real life, so why would something more than "it's a film" be necessary to respond? If you make a more nuanced or detailed argument, you'll get a more nuanced and detailed response.



I don't really understand the sarcasm here. Your post contained only the idea that this relationship would be bad if it happened in real life, so why would something more than "it's a film" be necessary to respond? If you make a more nuanced or detailed argument, you'll get a more nuanced and detailed response.
I can't possibly anticipate every single situation where an 18-year-old student became infatuated with a high school teacher, but I think a valid case can be made that there might be some such situations that would make for an intelligent, well-thought-out movie, and one can even point to such classics as Lolita to see that there are some possible good takes on similar situations. I mean, in the novel, Lolita's protagonist is obsessed with a 12-year-old girl.

What I do not know, because the story does not go into further details, is whether people reacting negatively to this movie are doing so just on the basis of the premise alone, or because the subject matter is handled in such a spectacularly bad way by the filmmakers.

I'm sure that real-life situations like this might arise, but I'm pretty sure that there is no way anything even remotely resembling what is being portrayed in the movie could possibly happen in the real world.

Were the filmmakers truly interested in a serious examination of the subject matter, or were they simply trying to attract the more prurient moviegoers out there? Honestly, it's hard to say. That alone makes the movie more than a little creepy, imho.



You ready? You look ready.
This is perfectly ok as long as you're getting paid.
__________________
"This is that human freedom, which all boast that they possess, and which consists solely in the fact, that men are conscious of their own desire, but are ignorant of the causes whereby that desire has been determined." -Baruch Spinoza