The Dark Knight Rises

Tools    





Bright light. Bright light. Uh oh.
Yeah. So 50,000 people didn't go th the opening weekend (yeah, right)? That was the highest -grossing flick of the year, even surpassing The Last Crusade.
__________________
It's what you learn after you know it all that counts. - John Wooden
My IMDb page



Yeah. So 50,000 people didn't go the the opening weekend (yeah, right)? That was the highest -grossing flick of the year, even surpassing The Last Crusade.
I didn't say that many people didn't go see the film, I said 50,000 people protested on Michael Keaton playing the lead role in Batman in '89. (Look it up) Re-read what people write. Besides with all the people who saw Batman since its release , 50,000 isn't that many.

Originally Posted by Jrs
Michael Keaton's casting for Batman in 1989 caused a controversy amongst comic book fans, with 50,000 protest letters sent to Warner Bros. offices



Bright light. Bright light. Uh oh.
I'm sorry if you didn't like my post, but there's no reason for me to reread yours. I said what I meant and its point is still true. A friendly question... How old were you in 1989?



will.15's Avatar
Semper Fooey
I was around and I remember the big stink it caused from comic book fans and how up in arms publications like the Comic Buyer's Guide was about it. But it wasn't really about the casting of Michael Keaton by itself. They were worried casting someone primarily known at the time as a comic meant the filmmakers were not taking the character seriously and the finished product would be a comedy or camp. The anger and suspicion disappeared long before the movie was released because it became clear Burton and his collaborators were not taking their cues from the 1960s TV series. While there may still have been some concern expressed about Keaton, most fans took a wait and see attitude and were no longer unduly upset.



Batman 3 To Be Totally IMAX?



According to a report in The Wall Street Journal, Warner Bros. and IMAX have finalized an agreement to release up to 20 films through 2013 in the giant format. Batman 3 will be one of these releases pending the confirmation of a release date, which is expected to be in mid-July 2012.

Also, Dan Fellman -- president of domestic distribution at Warner Bros. -- revealed that director Chris Nolan may shoot Batman 3 entirely in IMAX. Recently, cinematographer Wally Pfister hinted that B3 might be totally filmed in IMAX.

For the full story, click on the link provided above. Also, read the full WB/IMAX press release below...

LOS ANGELES, April 28, 2010 -- IMAX Corporation and Warner Bros. Pictures, a unit of Time Warner Inc. , announced today that they have completed an agreement to release up to 20 Warner Bros. films in IMAX's format over the course of the next three and a half years (from 2010 through 2013). The agreement strategically aligns Warner Bros.' tent-pole business with the increasing worldwide popularity of The IMAX Experience(R) in both 2D and IMAX(R) 3D, providing the studio with an added distribution platform that consistently delivers strong box office returns. The agreement underscores the excitement around the studio's future films which are anticipated to be among the best Hollywood event titles slated for release in the coming years.

Under the agreement, Warner Bros. movies that will be released in IMAX are: Legends of the Guardian: The Owls of Ga'Hoole 3D (September 24, 2010); Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 (3D) (November 19, 2010); Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part II (3D) (July 15, 2011); Happy Feet 2 (3D) (November 18, 2011); and The Hobbit (December 2013). Warner Bros. and IMAX also plan to release an additional 15 films over the course of 2011, 2012 and 2013, including Gravity, Dark Shadows, Fury Road, Batman 3, and Superman.

"Our track record with IMAX has been incredible, and incorporating 3D into this collaborative effort will serve as the ultimate experience for our audiences," said Dan Fellman, President, Domestic Distribution, Warner Bros. Pictures. "We are extraordinarily proud of our forthcoming slate and eager to offer these films to audiences in the most premium of movie-going experiences."

"We're thrilled to join with IMAX in bringing global audiences new and exciting experiences through the 3D IMAX format," said Veronika Kwan-Rubinek, President, International Distribution, Warner Bros. Pictures. "We have a tremendously powerful slate of quality tentpole films, and as IMAX theaters continue to expand internationally, more and more audiences will have the opportunity to experience our films using this exciting format."

"Warner Bros. is and has been an important strategic partner for IMAX. The success of our partnership to date is a result of our integrated approach to marketing and release strategies, and we believe this formula will lead to more box office success in the future," said Richard L. Gelfond, CEO of IMAX. "Our digital theatre system has accelerated the growth of our theatre network and provides us with significant flexibility in the release and programming schedule in our theatres. This important announcement provides increased visibility into our future film slate, enabling existing and potential exhibitors to better know what's 'coming soon' in their IMAX(R) theatres."

"IMAX has a deep appreciation for Warner Bros.' approach to the film business; they consistently work with the industry's most talented filmmakers, produce and release blockbuster films that captivate global audiences and make going to the movies a fun, powerful and inspiring experience," said Greg Foster, Chairman and President of IMAX Filmed Entertainment. "We are confident that continuing to team with Warner Bros. to distribute market, promote and showcase their 'all-star' titles in IMAX will delight movie-goers around the world and achieve box office and critical success that will benefit our two companies and our exhibitor partners."

Since June 2003, Warner Bros. Pictures has released 25 titles in IMAX's format, 10 of which featured IMAX 3D, including several live action pictures that were partially converted into 3D with IMAX's proprietary 2D-to-3D conversion technology. Warner Bros. films have generated approximately $565 million in box office revenues at IMAX theatres around the world. Each Hollywood title was digitally re-mastered into the image and sound quality of The IMAX Experience using IMAX's proprietary IMAX DMR(R) (Digital Re-Mastering) technology. Also included in the tally are the studio's four original IMAX 3D co-productions, "NASCAR 3D" (2003), "Deep Sea 3D" (2008), "Under the Sea 3D" (2009) and "Hubble 3D," in select IMAX theatres now.
Source: Batman-On-Film



Next Batman Movie Coming July 20, 2012


Warner Bros. Pictures has set a July 20, 2012 release date for Christopher Nolan's third Batman movie in conventional and IMAX theaters! That is a little over two weeks after Sony Pictures is releasing their Spider-Man reboot on July 3, 2012.

Nolan's second Batman movie, The Dark Knight, opened July 18, 2008 and earned more than $1 billion at the worldwide box office.


Source: ComingSoon.net



It's a screen that bends up and around the walls (I think it's taller than it is wide), it's shame the local IMAX refuses to play actual movies - but I never understood how some of Dark Knight was shot in IMAX and the rest wasn't. Does it just switch aspect ratios in the middle of the movie ?
__________________



Actually, I believe the screen that bends around is an OMNIMAX screen. We have one here in the Pittsburgh Science Center. The theater is basically a dome, and initially it just displayed various documentaries before the technology started being used for mainstream films. I saw a couple such films there, and one opened with a shot flying over the city, and being a bit afraid of heights, I was actually a little scared. Having the screen wrap around your field of vision, and looming so large in front of you, can be almost unsettlingly immersive.

Anyway, if the screen is big, but still ultimately flat, then I think it's just IMAX.

Of course, this is without getting into the "LIE-MAX" controversy, wherein the IMAX name is licensed to increasingly smaller screens that are often a very poor representation of what IMAX used to mean in terms of both size and sound quality.



I never understood how some of Dark Knight was shot in IMAX and the rest wasn't. Does it just switch aspect ratios in the middle of the movie ?
I'm not sure. I saw The Dark Knight a couple of times on a normal screen, and then once on a LIE-MAX screen, and I didn't notice any such shift during the IMAX scenes (I believe they were largely the cityscape shots in the Lao abduction scene). I think the rest of the film might have been blown up artificially so that everything fit, kind of like magnifying something of lesser detail to match the size of something with greater detail.



Rule Britannia....
I've been away for a while, so I found these exciting news.. Glad to see some fresh updates
__________________
You looked but you didn't see



Rule Britannia....
Will Michael Jai White Return For Third 'Batman'?

Could the Joker’s reign of terror in The Dark Knight have left behind a survivor after all?

As we all know, Christopher Nolan and his team from the first two Bat-films are hard at work on the third entry of the series. There’s no word yet which villains will appear, which actors have been cast to play said villains, or if any of the bad guys from either Batman Begins and/or The Dark Knight will be returning. Lest we forget, the Scarecrow, played by Cillian Murphy, made an appearance in both movies, and if we’re lucky he’ll be back a third time.

But now comes word from Michael Jai White, who played the gangster Gambol in 2008’s The Dark Knight, that would seem to imply the coffin door on his character may not be closed shut. If you’ll recall, Gambol put a bounty on the Joker’s head, and a group of street thugs came around with his corpse, only it turned out the clown wasn’t as dead as he initially appeared. What followed was one of Heath Ledger/Joker’s most intense speeches, in which he rhapsodized about being scarred by his own father, all the while holding a knife inside Gambol’s mouth.
Then the Joker killed him, right? Actually, here’s what White said in a recent interview with Comic Book Movie:

"The thing I’ve heard is that my character didn’t die in the movie. It’s up to speculation. There’s a knife that’s in my mouth. I never shot a death scene. The only scene I shot was where he puts the knife in my mouth, and he flicks the knife and cuts my cheek and I go down. But the way they cut away in the shot, and you see me go down, I guess in your imagination I’m dead or something. But if you look at that shot again, well, when did he put it next to my neck? So…"

Having watched The Dark Knight at least a half-dozen times, I can say that White’s totally correct (although you’d be forgiven for looking away, as the tension gets ratcheted up to some pretty unbearable levels). Admittedly, a throat-slitting scene might have cost the film its PG-13 rating, but it’s more fun to speculate that it was intentional, and Gambol might return in the third Bat-film. What does White think?

"Well, it’s a possibility, I could return like half a Joker," he said.

Personally, if the character does come back, I hope it’s as a relatively-ordinary gangster, as Gotham City seemed short on them by the time The Dark Knight ended.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
source:http://www.cinemaspy.com/article.php?id=4443