Lennon's reviews!

→ in
Tools    





Will your system be alright, when you dream of home tonight?

Doubt

This was a film that snuck up on me. I mean I consider myself a Phillip Seymour Hoffman fan and I don't remember hearing anything about this film until like two weeks ago on a Reelzchannel show. I had heard that the script was superb, Meryl Streep and Viola Davis were total knock outs, and that I should definitely see this film. I made time to see it, and I really think you should too.

John Patrick Shanley adapted his play, by both writing and directing it, and I am glad for that. That means he knows what he wants, and it was a great play, so of course it became a great movie.

The script won the Pulitzer mother truckin' Prize, so if it is good enough for them, it absolutely astounded me. The dialogue came off very naturally. All characters are likable to a degree (even Meryl Streep,) and they all had their motivations to do their actions. The story will leave you asking questions, and if a script can do that, then it is good.

JPS' direction was pretty much what I would expect from a director after a twenty year break. He shoots his conversations the less traditional way with his camera angles, it made me feel more like a fly on the wall more than an actual person in there. But those opening scenes give off a very scary feel, and that more than made up for the conversation scenes.

The cinematography added a lot to that scary feel. It was very dark and helped drag you in. He just didn't have a lot of opportunities to work with, as much of the movie was shot inside.

Speaking of not having a lot of opportunities, The costume department did well for what it was given. I always have liked 1940 and 1950 clothes, but there are so few characters that they don't get to show much. Same goes for the set department, the school also helped give off a very scary atmosphere that I've been talking about. I would have loved to see what they both could have done with a few more opportunities.

However, the acting did have a lot of opportunities to shine, and most everyone took it and did astounding. Meryl Streep gives one of those performances that by the end you are just throwing the freakin' Oscar at the screen. Amy Adams does well trying to keep a smile on her face the whole time. Phillip Seymour Hoffman's New York accent fell a lot. The kid actors did well enough with what they were given. But the true surprise was Viola Davis, even if it was just one scene, it was a colossal scene, I wouldn't be surprised come Oscar time if she wins.

Rating:
See it before it goes out of the cinema.
__________________
I used to be addicted to crystal meth, now I'm just addicted to Breaking Bad.
Originally Posted by Yoda
If I were buying a laser gun I'd definitely take the XF-3800 before I took the "Pew Pew Pew Fun Gun."



Great review, my aunt and cousin saw Doubt and both of them loved it. I'm gonna try and see it sometime soon.



Will your system be alright, when you dream of home tonight?

The Wrestler

Ever since I had to miss this movie when it came to SLIFF (St. Louis International Film Festival) due to prior arrangements, I have regretted it. Every site I have looked at has either A) already have a review and they are positive or B) haven't seen it but really want to see it. Movieforums.com is now in A.

As I've implied, I really dug this movie, like a whole lot. Mostly for Rourke's incredible performance. If you've seen a picture of him before this, then see Randy "The Ram" your jaw will drop. If his physical transformation wasn't enough, he has a lot of powerful scenes where he can really show his range. Evan Rachel Wood also has a role, but it's a pretty nothing role, she does do well in it though. Marrissa Tomei can't act her way out of a paper bag really, The only good part for her I remember is her topless.

Darren Aronofsky however did do very well. The way he filmed some of those fight scenes were very interesting. At times he used a special camera effect that gave it a grainy look which made you think at times that it was documentary. You get the feel that you're actually in the crowd.

The script by Robert D. Siegel helps with this. The story does go well, and you can see why everyone did what they did, Ram's dialogue worked well, and Marrissa Tomei's lines try so hard to not sound like Adrian from Rocky but I got that vibe a whole lot. Evan Rachel Wood's dialogue just seems so P.O.'d most of the time, and I really dug Robert's portrayl of the real world, always making fun of Randy.

The best part of the script was that Randy "The Ram" is such a flawed character, he's single, broke, lives in a crap trailer, has hearing problems, has heart problems, and his daughter hates him, but he's so likable. Marrissa Tomei's is kind of a one sided "stripper with a heart of gold" character, the only thing I can remember is that she didn't like being a stripper and had a kid. We also learn next to nothing about Evan Rachel Wood, which works because we just have to know about as much as The Ram does. Even with these, it was still my favorite script of the year.

Another thing that was one of my favorites of the year was the song by Bruce Springsteen. I'm a mild fan of his but the song at the end blew me away. It summed up the movie perfectly and I'll be damned if Miley "look I'm half-naked but thank god I'm hot" Cyrus beats him.

Rating:
This is going to be a surefire Oscar winner.



28 days...6 hours...42 minutes...12 seconds
I'll honestly say that I am surprised at the type of films you have been reviewing as of late.
__________________
"A laugh can be a very powerful thing. Why, sometimes in life, it's the only weapon we have."

Suspect's Reviews



Will your system be alright, when you dream of home tonight?
I'll honestly say that I am surprised at the type of films you have been reviewing as of late.
? What do you mean?



You're a Genius all the time
Marisa Tomei will probably never be considered a great actress or anything but I though she was fantastic in this movie and pretty darn good in Before The Devil Knows You're Dead, too. I actually think her character in The Wrestler was one of the least cliched things about the movie.

I more or less agree with most of your review though - even the Springsteen part. And I hate Springsteen.



Good review, I keep hearing it get all this praise. I'm gonna have to go online and check it out sometime soon.



Thanks for the review John must see this
__________________
Health is the greatest gift, contentment the greatest wealth, faithfulness the best relationship.
Buddha



Will your system be alright, when you dream of home tonight?

Milk

Let me start by stating my political views. I'm not against homosexuals. I'm not really against anything. My personal opinion is as long as you aren't hurting someone mentally, physically, financially, etc. then it's cool by me. I won't judge you, you don't judge me.

Next, I knew next to nothing about Harvey Milk. All I knew came from Holden Pike's wonderful thread (found HERE.) I hadn't even seen the documentary yet (Huluing now.) So I can't comment on much of the accuracy.

Now I can comment on the film's quality. The script does suffer from what all biographical movies do, and that's that they can;t convert someone's life actions into about 2 hours of film. A documentary can accomplish this a little easier because they can just say "Harvey Milk tried to be elected into the City councel three times" then actually showing it. I'd have liked to learn more about Milk's childhood, but you can't have it all.

One part were you actually do have it all, is the acting. Sean Penn headlines as the titaluar Milk. It was everything you've heard and more, ten minutes in, you'll forget it's Sean Penn and think it is Harvey Milk. Emile Hirsch surprised me on how good of a gay he was. James Franco shows that he can be more than a stoner and Harry Osborn, and can do serious projects. Even Josh Brolin, coming off No Country for Old Men and W. does about ten times better than wwhat I've seen from both those movies. Great ensamble cast.

Even Gus van Sant, a director whose only film of his I've seen is the pointless remake of Psycho, and he did a shot by shot remake of the 1960 original, so I really can't judge from other works. But I really did dig the directing here, besides the editing, nothing stood out as to why he should be the Best Director Oscar Winner (that should go to mister Aronofsky) but nothing that stood out as a Razzie. A nice middle line.

Rating:
All in all, I really dug the film.



I really want to see Milk, I'll probably watch a screener copy online sometime this weekend.



Will your system be alright, when you dream of home tonight?

Gran Torino

I'm going to admit it. I haven't seen many Clint Eastwood movies. Besides The Good The Bad and The Ugly (which he didn't even direct) and the first Dirty Harry (which I didn't like to much) i'm not sure I've seen any. It was a nice introduction to him though.

First with Clint himself. His acting was outstanding. Just the first look into the camera in the beginning you can nearly know his situation and what he feels. so if he did get nominated, or wins the Oscar it won't be by some pity votes because this just might be his last movie, it'll be because he's actually good. Chris Carley does do well as the local priest and Bee (yes, that's a real name) Vang does do well as the silent type, try to, as they say in the movie, grow a pair. One who really stood out horribly was the newcomer Ahney Her, and most of the horribly cliched Hmong gangsters. I can cut a little slack on them, but one scene I litterally cringed from their acting.

His directing was also good. During the "Gran Torino stealing" scene with the light swinging back and forth, it gives you a sence of being scared but more importantly it looks cool. His camera movement was also very good, I'm no Ebert or film expert so I can only describe this as "cool looking dude" it wasn't like Cloverfield were you get sick from watching it for to long, but it doesn't just transfer boringly.

Nick Schenk, another person whose films I don't regularly watch, wrote the original story. It could have been perfect, but wasn't. It became a little slow moving at points, I mean in the first scene we already know that his family doesn't like him and are greedy, do we need a second secne that basically reiterates it. Also the characters do some uprepossterious things, like Walt and Father Janovich's relationship. I mean Walt spends all this time avoiding Janovich then all of the sudden just decides to have a pretty heat to heart talk to him. Then some of the dialouge was disterious. Maybe if they had a long enough time to perfect it it could have been great.

Gran Torino could have been something really special, but it all basically came from Clint and a few others. He makes this movie, and even though the fact that this could be his last movie is reason enough to see it. It's still a pretty solid flick that should shine pretty well come Oscar nominations.

Rating:



Great review, Gran Torino is easily my second favorite of the year.



Will your system be alright, when you dream of home tonight?
--------------------copied from Movie Tab II----------------





MY BLOODY VALENTINE 3D


Let me start by saying that this movie was really really fun. And if you're going to see it, shell out the extra $2 to go see it in 3D. It really surprised me by how much I enjoyed myself.


Now for the real review, I'll start by addressing the thing that if you're even thinking of seeing this, the kills. Some were pretty bland, lots of oh, here's a shield, this will protect me, then after a while fail to dodge. Some where kind of mediocre, a nurse being pickaxed in the back. And some where just off-the-wall cool, shovel used in a way that they probably shouldn't. You even get the cliche of partying teens being killed.


And yes, plenty of gore. You see a persons ribcage, without the skin covering it. You even see lots of human hearts, in chocolate heart candy. It just never looked that realistic. But for a movie like this, I guess we have to suspend belief for an hour and half. The 3d enhanced this a lot though, the beginning scene does feel like it drags you into the movie.


Now as far as the technical aspect goes, the direction was meh. I think I was the only one who noticed, but during some of the later kill scenes (starting with Red in the mine) it looked like someone was like speeding the film up. It was just weird. Also, it used the AvP:R method of being to dark at times. You've got it man, you've got to flaunt it.


As far as the script goes, lots of people make stupid decisions (Sarah and Tom in the car towards the end.) The ending was pretty stupid, I mean they try to throw you a curve ball, but it's still a bad ball thrown. While still talking about baseball, this curve ball was so bad, it almost hits you in the kahunas. It also ended in the cliche way of the killer, I'll be back, way. I'm not even sure, why the killer did it. No motive appeared, even after the flashy montage.


The acting doesn't really help the script either. Jensen Ackles can barely act, and is quickly becoming the next Paul Walker. I never felt any chemistry between him and Jamie King. It was even worse with Kerr Smith. One role I really did like was a naked Betsy Rue,not just because she's naked (but it certainly helps) but the fact that she's funny, campy, and delivers a hella good scream.


To wrap it up, MBV is a so-so movie. But I had fun watching it and I think you will too



Will your system be alright, when you dream of home tonight?

Mystic River

Now, I wasn't sure what to think before getting this movie. I remember a lot of hub bub, and something called the Oscars? (I was 11, excuse me for not caring!) It won Best Actor and Best Supporting Actor for Sean Penn and Tim Robbins (greatly deserved) and was nominated for Best Adapted Screenplay, Best Director, Best Supporting Actress, and Best Picture, which were again, greatly deserved. So maybe a month ago, I noticed the top 100 list of fellow MoFo, MovieMan saying that "it has the most powerful ending of all-time." I've agreed with him a lot (and disagreed, Dirty Harry ain't that great.) But I must say, I immensly agree.

Our story is about childhood friends named Dave (Robbins), Sean (Kevin Bacon) and Jimmy (Sean Penn.) One day during the summer, a "cop" stops them as they are writing their name in wet cement. The "cop" turns out to be a pedophile, and takes Dave away. 25 years later Jimmy's daughter is murdered, reuiniting the "friends."

The most outstanding thing about MR is the acting. Tim Robbins, playing the sexually abused adult, is probably given the emotional role. You can actually see him going insane, and the interrogation scen with Fishburne and Bacon is just purely amazing. Sean Penn is more than likely next, he plays the former criminal father to a Tee. Before Milk I never saw Sean Penn act, but he's quickly becoming one of my favorite actors right now. I'll be sure to check out Dead Man Walking, I am Sam, and Sweet and Lowdown sometime soon. If you don't think he deserved the Oscar, look at the scene that I pictured, watch it, then look me straight in the eyes and tell me he still didn't have the best performance of the year. Kevin Bacon and Laurence Fishburne have good chemistry, like two cop partners rightly should. Even Marcia Gay Harden does well as the wife basically having a psychotic breakdown.

The script by Brian Helgeland, based off of Dennis Lehane's book of the same name, of cource helps with this. I could go on and on about how the ending was one of the best I've ever seen (Casino is the only one that comes even close to beating it.) Or how complex the script is, with fully fleshed out sub-plots. But one thing I think that needs mentioning is the little things, like in the first scene 25 years after the friends, nothing is actually explained to us, hell we dont even know it's 25 yars later. The script makes you think, make connections, but by the end it comes full circle. It's marvelous.

Add in Eastwood's directing (my second film of his, after Gran Torino) and the movie just gets better. His transitions are fantastic. During the scene outside the bar with Dave and Jimmy, the way Eastwood switches inbetween them and the Harris', I really liked it. Even the way in the beginning, the way he shot it, he makes the scene move so fast, and tells us so much, capturing the franticness, is great. I loved it.

I'm trying not to sound way to positive, I'm trying to find flaws, but honestly, I think I loved it to much. If you haven't seen it, see it ASAP. Definte top 15 material.



Great review Lennon, I agree with most of the stuff you mentioned. I do think Penn was just a little better acting wise than Robbins though. I'm currently making my way through the novel, I haven't really got far because I've been very busy lately. I may put it on pause though, because I want to re-read Watchmen before it comes out in March. I'll tell you how the book is after I finish reading it. I definitely agree with you on the ending though, it has the best movie ending of all-time.



Kevin Bacon and Laurence Fishburne have good chemistry,
I thought so to. I did not think they were going to at first but they suprised me.
__________________
Stallone is my hero!



28 days...6 hours...42 minutes...12 seconds
The Wrestler
At times he used a special camera effect that gave it a grainy look which made you think at times that it was documentary. You get the feel that you're actually in the crowd.

Or he shot it in 16mm, not so special camera effect. Just a low budget type of film stock.



Will your system be alright, when you dream of home tonight?
Good to know.