98th Academy Awards Ceremony (2026 Oscars)

Tools    





Well, the Academy seems pleased with Conan.

Conan O'Brien has been announced as the host of next year's Oscars, which have just announced their date: March 15, 2026.


The Oscars want more Conan!

After a rapturous reception at this year’s Academy Awards, emcee Conan O’Brien will return to the Dolby Theatre for the 98th Oscars on March 15, 2026.

The announcement comes from Bill Kramer, Academy CEO, and Janet Yang, Academy president, who also confirmed the return of the Emmy-winning producing team Raj Kapoor and Katy Mullan, who will lead the show for the third consecutive year.

Using his signature humor, O’Brien quipped in a statement: “The only reason I’m hosting the Oscars next year is that I want to hear Adrien Brody finish his speech.”

Brody’s best actor speech for “The Brutalist” clocked in as the longest in the ceremony’s history.



Brody's speech was longer than Greer Garson when she won for Mrs Miniver? Pretty sure that was the longest acceptance speech in Academy history.
Maybe they meant since they've been telecasting the ceremony?



The Academy will finally give an award for stunt people…




Important changes just announced...


The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences on Monday announced rules and campaign regulations for the upcoming 98th Oscars, which will be held March 15, 2026. Chief among the changes is a new procedural demand that voters must now watch all nominated films in each category in order to be eligible to vote in the final round. How they expect members to prove they have watched is not spelled out in the AMPAS release today, but this is a key change in rules that never laid it out quite like this before.

Another — and welcome — key change is that all designated nominees will have their names included on the final ballot. Previously. in many categories. it was just the name of the nominated movie, not the person nominated.

Meanwhile, category rules for eligibility and voting for the inaugural Academy Award for Achievement in Casting have been codified. There will be a preliminary round of voting to determine a shortlist of 10 films, and prior to nominations voting Casting Directors Branch members will be invited to view a “bake-off” presentation of the shortlisted achievements including a Q&A with the designated nominees. There still is no mention about where the inaugural Casting Oscar would be presented, whether on the Oscar show itself, during the Governors Awards, or at some other place.

Other substantive rules changes
  • In the rules for film eligibility, the following language regarding Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been introduced, as recommended by the Academy’s Science and Technology Council:
  • With regard to Generative Artificial Intelligence and other digital tools used in the making of the film, the tools neither help nor harm the chances of achieving a nomination. The Academy and each branch will judge the achievement, taking into account the degree to which a human was at the heart of the creative authorship when choosing which movie to award.
  • For consideration in the Best Picture category, films released from January 1, 2025, through June 30, 2025, must have shown proof of submission for Producers Guild of America (PGA) mark certification or awards-only determination no later than September 10, 2025. Films released from July 1, 2025, through December 31, 2025, must have shown proof of submission to the PGA no later than November 13, 2025.
  • In the Animated Short Film category, voting privileges in the nominations round will be extended to all Academy members who opt in to participate. Members must view all 15 shortlisted films to be eligible to vote in the category.
  • ​​​​​​In the Cinematography category, there will now be a preliminary round of voting for the Cinematography award to determine a shortlist of between 10 and 20 films.
  • In the International Feature Film category, the eligibility requirement regarding creative control has been updated to be inclusive of filmmakers with refugee or asylum status.
  • The submitting country must confirm that creative control of the film was largely in the hands of citizens, residents, or individuals with refugee or asylum status in the submitting country.



>The Academy will finally give an award for stunt people…

Who knew the Fall Guy would be the biggest influence of last year?

>The submitting country must confirm that creative control of the film was largely in the hands of citizens, residents, or individuals with refugee or asylum status in the submitting country.

They calling this the "Sacred Fig Rule?" Perhaps "Rule of the Sacred Fig?"



In the Cinematography category, there will now be a preliminary round of voting for the Cinematography award to determine a shortlist of between 10 and 20 films.

This is a step in the right direction, this is either going to improve the BP field or clean out the Cinematography field of the niche choices.



This is a step in the right direction, this is either going to improve the BP field or clean out the Cinematography field of the niche choices.
It's only cinematographers who nominated in that category, anyway. I don't really see what "correcting" there is to do?
__________________
"Film is a disease. When it infects your bloodstream it takes over as the number one hormone. It bosses the enzymes, directs the pineal gland, plays Iago to your psyche. As with heroin, the antidote to Film is more Film." - Frank Capra



It's only cinematographers who nominated in that category, anyway. I don't really see what "correcting" there is to do?

Because it's not a secret list, everyone knows what the short list is so voters can be more discerning with their time and votes.


I think the short list is part of why we've seen such a big uptick in foreign language being successful like I'm Still Here, Godzilla Minus One, Flow, All Quiet on the Western Front.



The foreign language category has always been its own process, it has only been tweaked.

If some of the same cinematographers who already made the nominations are making the shortlist...what's the difference? And if this is necessary, why doesn't every single category now make shortlists?



The foreign language category has always been its own process, it has only been tweaked.

If some of the same cinematographers who already made the nominations are making the shortlist...what's the difference? And if this is necessary, why doesn't every single category now make shortlists?

Because this isn't about the cinematographers but the trickle down aspect to other voters. And yes foreign language category has been done one way for a while, but the way we consume film has changed over the past few years.


The last three winners all came out, before the "Awards Season" started in November, with the two winners before that coming on Streaming because of closed theaters.



Because this isn't about the cinematographers but the trickle down aspect to other voters.
I do not know what you mean by that. What other voters?

The last three winners all came out, before the "Awards Season" started in November, with the two winners before that coming on Streaming because of closed theaters.
Wait, what? Your argument for the Best Cinematography award needing to be overhauled is because the last few winners have come from films that were released before "Awards season"?!? If that were even true, to me that says the Cinematographers Branch is doing something correctly, not something that needs modification. But...well, it really isn't true. The Brutalist and All Quiet On the Western Front were very much released during the so-called Awards season. Oppenheimer was the third-biggest film of the year and would have been a runaway shoo-in for the Cinematography award no matter what time of year it was released.

I am not being dense for the sake of making an argument, I just truly do not understand a) what you think is wrong with the Cinematography category as it has existed until now and b) what you think a shortlist is going to do, exactly?



Trouble with a capitial 'T'
The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences on Monday announced rules and campaign regulations for the upcoming 98th Oscars, which will be held March 15, 2026. Chief among the changes is a new procedural demand that voters must now watch all nominated films in each category in order to be eligible to vote in the final round.
About time! Ever since day one in the HoFs that has been our cardinal rule.

But what about the Academy's short list of films? Sounds like an Academy member can vote initially without seeing the films. Is that correct?



>The Academy will finally give an award for stunt people…

Who knew the Fall Guy would be the biggest influence of last year?

>The submitting country must confirm that creative control of the film was largely in the hands of citizens, residents, or individuals with refugee or asylum status in the submitting country.

They calling this the "Sacred Fig Rule?" Perhaps "Rule of the Sacred Fig?"
I hope this category wasn't created because of The Fall Guy because that movie was a hot mess.



I do not know what you mean by that. What other voters?

I think the way voters consume film has changed and when you end up on the short lists with the earlier awards your film gets a bump. The same way 25 years ago it was screeners in the mail and 50 years ago it was long theatrical releases that translated into boxoffice success.

Wait, what? Your argument for the Best Cinematography award needing to be overhauled is because the last few winners have come from films that were released before "Awards season"?!? If that were even true, to me that says the Cinematographers Branch is doing something correctly, not something that needs modification. But...well, it really isn't true. The Brutalist and All Quiet On the Western Front were very much released during the so-called Awards season.

Those were the winners, but we also saw a number of mediocre nominees. Bardo, Maria, El Conde, Emilia Perez, Empire of Light. Cinematography winners tend to be better than the BP winners that doesn't translate to the nominees.


Oppenheimer was the third-biggest film of the year and would have been a runaway shoo-in for the Cinematography award no matter what time of year it was released.

Which is great and all, it might have gotten 80% of the votes. But with a short list the voters could have then given films like Beau is Afraid, Dream Scenario, Holdovers, and Astroid City a second or third look. We don't know how many films got votes and what the cutoff was.

I am not being dense for the sake of making an argument, I just truly do not understand a) what you think is wrong with the Cinematography category as it has existed until now and b) what you think a shortlist is going to do, exactly?

I think it's going to be a better promotional tool for films that aren't front runners or in the foreign language categories. And this will have down ballot effects on the awards.



You are assuming a "short list" is somehow going to be radically different from the taste reflected in the five nominees that we have always seen. As I was trying to explain, if the committee or whoever it is that makes the short list is made up of the exact same Cinematography Branch voters, only a smaller sample size of them, their taste is not going to suddenly and radically change. Instead of having three or four you don't like you're going to have twelve or sixteen.

You seem to have some notion that the titles you deem unworthy are there because the nominations were somehow rushed. 'Oh, of course they chose Bardo, because they didn't get a chance to see films x, y, and z.' The vagaries of how somebody from any of the branches votes is not something I think you can somehow regulate. If blocks of voters tend to nominate their friends or for work that is attached to directors or producers or studios they either already work with or wish to work with, another public layer of nominating is not going to magically make them vote the way you apparently want them to.

Peace out.