My response is that I am not going to perform additional labor for you to pass some sort of ideological purity test.
Again, feel free to offer your own examples. Add something productive to a conversation for a change. Branch out a little bit.
1) A troll
2) Have horrendous reading comprehension, but a high ability to parrot back things you've read but never actually understood in the first place.
You can see my predicament, right? How can I possibly take the bait with such a person as this? Why would I spend the time I need to make all these fantastic points I've got sitting on the bench, waiting to throw a fastball directly into your crotch, when I know the Sisyphean ordeal I have ahead. All the fastballs. All the crotches.
Yes, there are some in the audience that would love it, bu it's no longer satisfying watching you pretend it doesn't hurt. It's tired and sad.
This is merely an example of what I am talking about. The question is whether the disinvited hearer or viewer has a moral responsibility to comply.
No one.
No, not even Pink.
So please, keep ignoring real things where people actually are having their rights compromised (something you do with great ease), and continue to fret about these hypotheticals where elite, left wing artists are frightening you with their feelings.
Tell me you only have generic meme-level responses without telling me you only have hackey-formulaic responses.
Yeah, you've got me. I'm a formulaic dud. But you should understand by now from experience, that sometimes all one needs is a meme to disassemble the arguments of a hack intellectual. No need to go the ergill route. You already had your bones picked clean years ago by him. I'm just here to push the sand over your remains. With memes.
Now, please, since I'm such easy pickings for such an intellectual titan as yourself, come and throw another barely relevant quote at me. Make yourself feel better.