Part of my thinking is that people will inevitably fight over qualifications when they're not well-defined, so it might be a lot to fight over the choice and its implementation. Which is why I like the idea of time-based lists being the "default," since at worst you're only fighting about that one thing. It's my experience that very few people get upset over doing decade lists, too, even if they're not their first choice. They're unobjectionable. Genre-lists, some people just sit out entirely, either because they don't like the genre, haven't seen enough of it, or maybe just don't like the rulings.
Anyway, I'll participate in any of them. Just noting that I think time-based lists are kind of "safe" relative to others.
Anyway, I'll participate in any of them. Just noting that I think time-based lists are kind of "safe" relative to others.
Can I ask a question? Has Holden Pike already talked to you privately about hosting a decades countdown next? I kind of get a feeling that's the case.