The Revenant's only flaw
Example of a civil claim to kick off a discussion:
And really, what kind of "debate" do you expect? Even your example above is just a flat contradiction. There's no real opportunity for debate with something like this. When someone says some highly admired thing is "overrated" and loads their description of it with incendiary pejoratives, they're not really looking for discussion.
"DiCaprio didn't seem grizzled enough to play a survivalist."Things you actually said:
"puny 15-yr-old-girl looking actor who can't act to save his life"You deliberately chose to phrase a controversial opinion in a way that would provoke a strong response. And both statements carry implications about sex and culture that, right or wrong, are also fair game. christine's response on this point was civil and substantive and tackled those implications (and with them, the entire complaint) with intelligence and civility, though you brushed it off (and seemed confused both about who said it and what they said) almost immediately, despite your ostensible desire for debate.
"I cannot take that girly boy seriously"
And really, what kind of "debate" do you expect? Even your example above is just a flat contradiction. There's no real opportunity for debate with something like this. When someone says some highly admired thing is "overrated" and loads their description of it with incendiary pejoratives, they're not really looking for discussion.
But, I feel I'm permitted (and so is everyone else) to strongly critique an actor/movie. I want to point out an important distinction: critiquing an actor (kind of the point of this site) vs attacking someone else on this site (not ok). I didn't attack other members in my OP, and not anywhere else, either, at least not until people had had their share of hurling personal insults at me.
What happened essentially was: I attacked an actor. People took it personally and attacked me. And, you're saying that's ok, right ? By attacking an actor, I'm laying out the carpet for people to attack *me* (vs attacking *my opinion*). Because attacking an actor is the same as attacking them ? Wow ... that makes perfect sense

I guess we're not getting anywhere with this particular debate. I'll just have to ignore personal attacks in the future ... that's the lesson learned. I guess popular (unquestioned) opinion will prevail, after all.
I think I've said more than what I wanted to say about this subject. I get how it works here. I think I'll just move on to the next thread now.
^lol. smart arse 

I'm still trying to figure out what a 'girly boy' is in red piller lingo. If this is a girly boy then I'm Taras Bulba.

I know that LDC is someone the movie business considers a great actor ... that doesn't mean I'm going to blindly accept him as such. I have my own independent thoughts from watching him on-screen and evaluating him. And, to me, he's a joke. To me, he belongs on the cover of GQ magazine, and not on the movie screen.
I've seen 23 of DiCaprio's films. I haven't liked every single one of them, but I've liked him in all of them. I think he's a tremendous talent with a lot of range and I've bought him in every one of those roles, including The Revenant.
I think your suggestions of "manlier" men to play the part are rather ridiculous. Others have already pointed out that a thinner physique makes sense for someone living the lifestyle that Hugh Glass led. But one thing that also needs to be noted is that DiCaprio was playing a real person. From what information I can find about Hugh Glass, he was about 40 years old at the time of the bear mauling, so it wouldn't make any sense to me to cast someone in their 50s or 60s, like Russell Crowe and Liam Neeson.
__________________
X
Favorite Movies
X
User Lists
Those of us who respect DiCaprio as an actor have independent thoughts too. We've formed our opinions from watching and evaluating his on-screen performances.
I've seen 23 of DiCaprio's films. I haven't liked every single one of them, but I've liked him in all of them. I think he's a tremendous talent with a lot of range and I've bought him in every one of those roles, including The Revenant.
I think your suggestions of "manlier" men to play the part are rather ridiculous. Others have already pointed out that a thinner physique makes sense for someone living the lifestyle that Hugh Glass led. But one thing that also needs to be noted is that DiCaprio was playing a real person. From what information I can find about Hugh Glass, he was about 40 years old at the time of the bear mauling, so it wouldn't make any sense to me to cast someone in their 50s or 60s, like Russell Crowe and Liam Neeson.
I've seen 23 of DiCaprio's films. I haven't liked every single one of them, but I've liked him in all of them. I think he's a tremendous talent with a lot of range and I've bought him in every one of those roles, including The Revenant.
I think your suggestions of "manlier" men to play the part are rather ridiculous. Others have already pointed out that a thinner physique makes sense for someone living the lifestyle that Hugh Glass led. But one thing that also needs to be noted is that DiCaprio was playing a real person. From what information I can find about Hugh Glass, he was about 40 years old at the time of the bear mauling, so it wouldn't make any sense to me to cast someone in their 50s or 60s, like Russell Crowe and Liam Neeson.

Alas, the past cannot be changed. Liam N is in his 60s and The Revenant will have to be immortalized with LDC in it, instead ... sigh

*edit*
crap! you people are suddenly all in a hurry to start replying to each other lol. this was supposed to fall right after @Dani8 !
*post-edit ...edit*
DAMNIT! Ok. well. Dani8 already caught it and replied so $%!$^!. I'm not deleting this. i've already committed....
-----
lol ...i think?

crap! you people are suddenly all in a hurry to start replying to each other lol. this was supposed to fall right after @Dani8 !
*post-edit ...edit*
DAMNIT! Ok. well. Dani8 already caught it and replied so $%!$^!. I'm not deleting this. i've already committed....
-----
lol ...i think?

X
Favorite Movies
If you read my comment about Liam N carefully, I did mention "if he were twenty years younger" 
Alas, the past cannot be changed. Liam N is in his 60s and The Revenant will have to be immortalized with LDC in it, instead ... sigh

Alas, the past cannot be changed. Liam N is in his 60s and The Revenant will have to be immortalized with LDC in it, instead ... sigh

If you read my comment about Liam N carefully, I did mention "if he were twenty years younger" 
Alas, the past cannot be changed. Liam N is in his 60s and The Revenant will have to be immortalized with LDC in it, instead ... sigh

Alas, the past cannot be changed. Liam N is in his 60s and The Revenant will have to be immortalized with LDC in it, instead ... sigh


X
Favorite Movies
X
User Lists
lol ...i think?


I'm disturbingly amused *cough* I mean I'm faux offended. Andrew Leigh looks like a flaming metrosexual, like Christian Bale in American Psycho or Mads Mikkelsen in Hannibal. Too much product in their bathroom cabinets.
I like how you conveniently ignore the fact that Russell Crowe is also too old for the part. 


Nothing a little make up can't fix

P.S. I don't think LDC was the only actor in his 40s available when the film was made. I'm pretty sure Matt Damon is in his 40s, and I would have cast him instead, if age were so important. Anyone better than LDC, and I think plenty of people match that description in my opinion.

Leo Dic !!!!!!!
__________________
"A film has to be a dialogue, not a monologue — a dialogue to provoke in the viewer his own thoughts, his own feelings. And if a film is a dialogue, then it’s a good film; if it’s not a dialogue, it’s a bad film."
"A film has to be a dialogue, not a monologue — a dialogue to provoke in the viewer his own thoughts, his own feelings. And if a film is a dialogue, then it’s a good film; if it’s not a dialogue, it’s a bad film."
- Michael "Gloomy Old Fart" Haneke
X
Favorite Movies
X
User Lists
big burly hugs to all around?

I think I need to go play girly girl weekend warrior and wake up my neighbours with the leaf blower.
I like how you conveniently ignore the fact that Russell Crowe is also too old for the part. 

Leo Dic !!!!!!!
LDC is my new abbreviation.
I didn't realize he's in his 50s ... thought he was in his 40s 
Nothing a little make up can't fix

Nothing a little make up can't fix


Besides his age, Crowe doesn't have the star power and respect he once had and certainly nowhere near as much as DiCaprio. No amount of make-up is going to fix that and I say that as a big Russell Crowe fan.
X
Favorite Movies
X
User Lists
I'm pretty sure Matt Damon is in his 40s, and I would have cast him instead, if age were so important. Anyone better than LDC, and I think plenty of people match that description in my opinion.

X
Favorite Movies
X
User Lists
Okay... Did you think he was in his 20s when he did Gladiator 17 years ago?
Besides his age, Crowe doesn't have the star power and respect he once had and certainly nowhere near as much as DiCaprio. No amount of make-up is going to fix that and I say that as a big Russell Crowe fan.

Besides his age, Crowe doesn't have the star power and respect he once had and certainly nowhere near as much as DiCaprio. No amount of make-up is going to fix that and I say that as a big Russell Crowe fan.
You know and I know and everyone knows that a character's age doesn't always match the age of the actor playing him/her. In fact, I'd be willing to claim that almost never do the ages match. They use late 20s actors to play high school kids, for instance.
I think your point about "star power" and "respect" are another example of what I see wrong with casting DiCaprio - because he is more of a "star" ? Don't care if he's a good fit ? He's a big star, so let's cast him ? I don't see that as a very compelling argument to cast someone. I think acting ability and role fit should be the criteria.
I honestly don't know how "famous" Tom Hardy is, compared to LDC, but he did a fabulous job in The Revenant ... he could have been a good candidate too (again, not worrying about age).