Rate The Last Movie You Saw

Tools    





Please Quote/Tag Or I'll Miss Your Responses


This was my second time viewing this movie in the theater. And it is still has hypnotizing, artful, and sleazy as ever. The score, the acting, the setting, EVERYTHING still resonates. It is an all time classic and my all time favorite film.



Also there was a cool into to the film with parts of the 40th anniversary screening cast reunion from the Tribeca Film Festival, and also I learned that there will be a 40th Anniversary Blu Ray of the film being released in November.

PRE ORDERED!
What was the audience like? Before, during, and after..



Please Quote/Tag Or I'll Miss Your Responses
Cinema Paradiso - 8/10

I loved the old man, and the relationship between the two. I lost interest when he met the girl - there wasn't anything there, no feeling, no real dialogue. It would have been nice if the owner of the theater had a line or two more, but most of his talk was small-talk.

EDIT: I saw the 124 min. version on Netflix, not the 155 min version. Anyone watch both?




The Letter (1940)

+


The movie opens with a woman, played by Bette Davis, chasing a man out of a house and brutally shooting him to death. They are both married, but to other people, so what follows is the why and the repercussions. This movie is a bit lurid for it's time and is quite entertaining. The acting is strong and it is filmed beautifully. A nice hidden gem from director William Wyler.



I have to return some videotapes...
Event Horizon (1997) -


A truly awful film, how can anyone like this garbage?
__________________
It's only after we've lost everything that we're free to do anything.



28 days...6 hours...42 minutes...12 seconds
The Girl on the Train

(Tate Taylor)





The Girl on the Train is one of the biggest selling debut novels ever, a book that was fast published to nip at the heels of the success of Flynn's Gone Girl. It makes sense that Hollywood would want to capitalize on this as well. The novel of The Girl on the Train will always be in Gone Girl's shadow, whether it's warranted or not and Tate Taylor's film suffers the same fate. Fincher had great success with Gone Girl, Taylor doesn't do the book justice and the book isn't even that great.

Rachel takes a train to and from New York everyday. While on her commute she always notices one couple from one house, this is Scott and Megan. She's never met them, but she likes to make up imaginary lives for them, thinking they are the perfect couple. One day, she sees Megan with another man and it turns her whole world upside down. Yet, can her judgement be trusted? She suffers from an addiction to alcohol, something she was driven to after her failed marriage with her husband Tom. Tom just so happens to live two houses down from Scott and Megan with his new wife and child, living in the same house Rachel use to live in. Things go from bad to worse when Megan goes missing and Rachel purposely inserts herself into the investigation to find out the truth.

There seems to be a lot going on by this description, but truth be told, the film fails to have any of it be interesting. You'd think that a mystery of a girl gone missing and having an unreliable narrator make for some suspense, but Taylor never creates any. The film feels hollow at its core and unfortunately it never manages to be what it tries so hard to be, which is a successful thriller. I ask myself, at what point was this film suspenseful? All of it is held until the last ten minutes, the reveal if you will, even then it's a fizzle. The biggest problem with the film is how boring it is. I'm watching this film from a viewpoint of a reader from the book. Yet I can't help but feel that if I hadn't read the book, that the reveal at the end would still be a predictable slug. The viewer gets to the ending well before the film does and you are sitting there just waiting for this film to catch up.

There are numerous "suspects" in the film and it wants you to believe in every single one of them, but anyone who watches a film knows that none of these people will turn out to be responsible. The book is told from 3 perspectives, Rachel, Megan and Anna, who is Tom's new wife. The film tries to juggle these perspectives throughout the almost 2 hour running time and not surprisingly is fumbles. Rachel, played by Emily Blunt is clearly the main focus. Megan, played by Haley Bennett, my favourite performance, has her story mostly told through flashbacks. Finally there is Anna, played by Rebecca Ferguson, whom I didn't even recognize until I started writing this review, is given the least amount of things to do.

On the other side of things we have Justin Theroux, Luke Evans and Edgar Ramirez as the three supporting male characters. Theroux is the perfect husband on the outside, but could possibly be hiding something sinister underneath. Evans is the husband of the missing woman, a man with anger issues and abuse claims. The look of him is intimidating enough for some and finally Ramirez as Megan's therapist with questionable morals. Each performance, while fine, serves the role written on the paper and none stand out beyond the page. The one performance in the whole film that goes above and beyond may be Blunt's, to the point of annoyance. Rachel is a drunk and Blunt goes for broke with her "drunk" performance. I really hated the character of Rachel in the books and Blunt does nothing to really win me over with the performance in the film either.

The film doesn't faulted because of the performances, those are fine for the most part. It suffers from the direction. Taylor does absolutely nothing to make the film memorable, to make it look enticing, to make it worth watching. The film bored me and I don't really get bored during films. Taylor does nothing to make me care for the mystery at the core of this story. I really wanted this film to be good, to be suspenseful and work as an adult thriller. It fails to do those things and it's one of the bigger disappointments of the year.
__________________
"A laugh can be a very powerful thing. Why, sometimes in life, it's the only weapon we have."

Suspect's Reviews



Alexander (2004)

Viewed for class. Film seeks to tell more a historical narrative than a theatrical one, which hurt its playback against the likes of Troy and 300, which both display a culture different to what we're accustomed to... Now we worship, girls... Love the woman. I see a point here, though. The Greeks knew, a strong culture, knows the man's prowess is to be aspired to. A nation shouldn't lose sight of the strength of man. The Greeks revered that, and were strong. The film drags on too long, the casting whiffs at crucial moments... Not sold Stone nailed Alexander, he made something worth considering, although it's not as great to watch bc it tried to be more historical rather than full sprint theater
How would you like to be treated

Rating:
6.0 / 10

TITANS






True Grit (2010)
If they wanted a decent funeral, they should have got themselves killed in summer.


Damn, another western for the top 10. I was very surprised by how much I liked this, and by how much fun it ended up being, but I suppose that's my fault placing doubt in the Coen Brothers, who I'm pretty sure cannot disappoint. I expected a well shot drama, which I got, but I got much more as well, with some surprisingly good action, characters and genuine comedic moments, and well, other moments, like a man screaming like a donkey, but that's easily forgiven. Hailee Steinfeld is impressive, while Jeff Bridges gives Tom Hardy a run for his money being the mumbling badass that he is(Can't wait to rewatch this with subtitles), and Matt Damon is ever so charming as the movie progresses, even keeping his pearly whites while everyone else has rotting maggots for teeth. I was surprised by Josh Brolin, who's character ended up being kinda campy and fun even somewhat likable, instead of your typical western Angel Eyesesque pure sinister baddy badman.

If I had to have a gripe I'd say allot of moments in this movie fall onto pure coincidence or luck which is a little unfortunate but it doesn't disengage me from the narrative.

But damn those Coen Brothers and their bittersweet endings, I just can't catch a break.





Love & Friendship (2016)




Frankenstein -



Solid film. Some great performances particularly Karloff as The Monster which is now iconic, some excellent scenes, and i liked how it enhanced some Young Frankenstein jokes. I also thought it looked fantastic which i wasn't really expecting. The only thing holding my rating back is the fact that i've heard the Frankenstein story a million times before, not a fault of the film obviously. It has got me pumped for Bride of Frankenstein though which i'm not familiar with. It is only 70 minutes long so i would say it's something everyone should check out.



the samoan lawyer's Avatar
Unregistered User

Force Majeure (2014)


I'm not going to spoil this for anyone as it really is best to go into this blind. Its built as a dark comedy but honestly I found it one of the most emotionally devastating films I've watched in a while. Took a while to get going but was very good.


__________________
Too weird to live, and too rare to die.



Welcome to the human race...
Guardians of the Galaxy -


Three viewings in and you'd think I'd like it, and yet...
__________________
I really just want you all angry and confused the whole time.
Iro's Top 100 Movies v3.0



Sorry if I'm rude but I'm right
are you rating porn?
I rate porn, too. Here's my rating scale:

- the fappening of century
- changed my life
- who needs a girlfriend?
- fapping along
- gave me a great time
- interesting
- made me want more
- boring
- annoying
- reprehensible
- topsy's home tape
__________________
Look, I'm not judging you - after all, I'm posting here myself, but maybe, just maybe, if you spent less time here and more time watching films, maybe, and I stress, maybe your taste would be of some value. Just a thought, ya know.