American Gangster

→ in
Tools    





Just posted a review of American Gangster, which I saw on Friday night. Horrific experience with the crowd there (I'll post about it later), but the film itself was very enjoyable. Here's the review:

American Gangster



Based on real events, American Gangster tells two simultaneous stories. The first is the story of Frank Lucas (Denzel Washington), a drug dealer who wrested control of the heroin trade from the Italian mob in the late 1960s and early 1970s. The second is the story of Richie Roberts (Russell Crowe), a New York detective trying to bring the heroin trade down.

The film wisely resists any temptation to paint the two as nemeses. They are opposites, however, but while the film does a wonderful job of contrasting them against one another, it's all from a distance. Lucas is unaware of Roberts' investigation for the bulk of the film, and Roberts doesn't even know who he's after at first.

Both characters are well-drawn and intriguing, though Washington's portrayal is the one everyone will be talking about. His Frank Lucas isn't really like any movie gangster we've seen before. He is clean-cut, methodical, and extremely careful. He knows what sorts of things bring a man like him down, and takes steps to avoid them. He's a capitalist, first and foremost, and could just as easily be selling soap as narcotics. It just so happens there's more money to be made in the latter.

Crowe's Roberts has a disjointed personal life, and unfortunately embodies that ancient crime film cliche: the cop who puts his career before his family.

Some have called the character of Lucas the "black Scarface," which is ironic, because the character of Roberts resembles another famous Al Pacino role: Serpico. Roberts is an honest cop in a time and place where corruption is par for the course. Early in the film, he finds $1 million in drug money and turns it in, and then spends the rest of the movie confirming to people that it actually happened.

Because American Gangster is based on a true story, I might be forgiven for revealing some of the twists and turns the film takes. But the film is much more enjoyable if you don't know the specifics, as it helps us appreciate just how clever Lucas' machinations are. One gets the impression that Lucas could have exploited any number of opportunities in the business world, if only he'd have taken notice of them before those afforded by the drug trade.

This film is, at times, brutally violent, though not in a shocking way. It relies on surprise and execution to heighten the impact of the violence, rather than going for the gross-out or shock reaction.

One of the things that helps American Gangster stand out is the quality of its supporting characters. Roberts' partner believably grapples with the line between integrity and corruption, and Lucas' grandmother (Ruby Dee) has a wonderful scene where we learn that she's not as naive as we might have assumed.

The film's last shot will be sure to provoke discussion, not because it features any sort of grand twist or revelation, but because it is rife with potential meaning. Everyone will have their own opinion of what it might be trying to tell us. My own interpretation is this: that Frank Lucas was so focused on being a good businessman that he forgot to be a good man, and that he helped create the world he ultimately finds himself in.




What was the last film you gave 5 popcorns to?
Some of the films I'd give 5 out of 5 to are my all-time favorites, which I haven't really reviewed yet. None of the new releases I've reviewed have gotten a perfect rating. I guess the most recent would be my review of The Impostors a few weeks ago.



Standing in the Sunlight, Laughing
Nice review, Yods. I liked it better than the movie.
I can appreciate the quality points you list, but found the experience of watching the movie to be pretty dull. It's long and tedious detail about the drug trade. bleah. As has been said elsewhere, there's nothing new in it, so reading the Wikipedia article would have been equally satisfying for me.
__________________
Review: Cabin in the Woods 8/10



A system of cells interlinked
saw it last night - amazing movie : easiley ridley scott's best
__________________
“It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance.” ― Thomas Sowell



Thanks for the kind words, Sam.

Anyone have any thoughts on what the film's last shot was supposed to mean? I'm referring to the one where Lucas is freed, and stands motionless, observing the ghetto he's been released into.

Obviously I explained my own interpretation in the review above, but it could mean a great many things that make just as much sense, and I'd be interested to hear what someone else thought of it.

One other (but similar) interpretation that occurred to me is that Lucas isn't tough anymore; because of people like him, everyone wants to be the next "American Gangster," creating a subculture where the original Frank Lucas wouldn't stand a chance.

It could also symbolize that the twisted morality that old-time gangers are imbued with in these films is long gone. That there is no more "honor among thieves" and that the drug trade is even more out of control than it was in Lucas' time. That criminals do not even have Lucas' brand of pseudo-morality.

What do you guys think?



Just posted a review of American Gangster, which I saw on Friday night. Horrific experience with the crowd there (I'll post about it later), but the film itself was very enjoyable. Here's the review:
Very enjoyable review, Yoda. Although I haven't seen the film, you seem to like as much as some of my friends do. What troubles me, however, is a tiresome cliche of gangster movies that you pointed out, although not in a negative manner.

In your review, you said: "He's a capitalist, first and foremost, and could just as easily be selling soap as narcotics. It just so happens there's more money to be made in the latter. . . . One gets the impression that Lucas could have exploited any number of opportunities in the business world, if only he'd have taken notice of them before those afforded by the drug trade. . . . My own interpretation is this: that Frank Lucas was so focused on being a good businessman that he forgot to be a good man, and that he helped create the world he ultimately finds himself in."

Well, that answers my question in another segment of this forum of whether Denzel Washington's performance will revive Frank Lucas's image the same way that Bonnie and Clyde romanticized that dispicable duo.

However, that ol' saw about the gangster as a frustrated businessman is as much a false and overworked cliche as the one about the prostitute with a heart of gold, neither of which has ever been embodied at any time in our society. It's like when someone once asked Willie Sutton why he robbed banks; "Because that's where the money is," he replied. Crooks aren't crooks because they're seeking thrills or are satisfying some sense of business accomplishment; they're crooks because they'd rather steal than work for a living. Most are not even good enough crooks to make it pay. Even while out on the street stealing, they need money for another fix, another card game, another bottle of booze. And when you figure in the jail time served and the penny-ante crimes committed, most don't even average minimum wage over their lifetimes. Plus they're prey for other crooks and sharpers as well as on the run from the justice system.

Even with the "big" crooks like Lucus, it's not simply that drugs turn a bigger profit than soap. It's also the fact that you can enlarge your market by putting a pistol to a competitor's head and blowing his brains all over the wall. I've never heard of Proctor & Gamble improving its quarterly earnings by that method. The worse that can happen to the end user of a Proctor & Gamble shampoo is that your eyes may sting if you get soap in them. Worse that could happen to Lucus' customers is that they turn to crime and prostitution to support their habits and end up with AIDS from a dirty needle or dead in an alley from an overdose. Even when Lucus "improves" his product by not stepping it down so much in order to retain higher purity, it killed his customers because they're not used to such hot doses.

Naw, even the most cynical opponent of the capitalist system can't really compare organized crime to the corporate system, because crime knows no restrictions, pays no taxes, has no rules that it must follow for the welfare of its customers. All crime is aimed at separating the working man from the fruits of his labor, even it it has to kill him and his loved ones in the process.



Anyone have any thoughts on what the film's last shot was supposed to mean? I'm referring to the one where Lucas is freed, and stands motionless, observing the ghetto he's been released into.
I haven't seen the film or the last shot, but your picturesque description, Yoda, instantly brought to mind my comparision with my brother, who frequently goes to Vegas to play the slots, and me, who went one time with him, won enough to break even on all my expenses and have never had the desire to return. The difference between me and my brother, I once said, is that when he stands in a casino and looks out over that field of slot machines, he sees Opportunity; I stand and look out over the same scene and I think, "Those SOBs are trying to steal my hard-earned money!"

Maybe Washington's "Lucas" simply sees another opportunity to hit the big time.



I loved the end shot - though i don't see many ways to interpret it : an old man who was once tough and important released into the streets where he's nothing anymore



Ar3d's Avatar
BANNED
I like the story concept of this movie as well the cast of this movie... there are known for being a good actors...



You're right. The supporting actors were great. I think that was my favorite part of the film. Generally speaking i think the story progressed a little too slowly, but I think I just got hung up on that early on. Maybe I was expecting something a little quicker right from the beginning.

Great review by the way. Very well written.
__________________
---------------------------
Online Film School



Standing in the Sunlight, Laughing
I've read in a few places that that final shot was supposed to be sort of a rorschacht (egads, how do you spell that?). I just thought he got out of jail. heh I guess if I reflect on it, he's a once powerful man, reduced to the status of a bum (sorry, there was no stopping it once I got started) ok, reduced to being just some guy, and he's released into a world he helped create... and that world sucks. It is sort of the most fitting punishment.

On the general topic of this film, I read recently that Frank Lucas has commented that about 10 percent of it is true. :/



Putting aside the true story, Scott has created a complex figure in his Frank Lucas which Denzel Washington plays so subtly that I think some people miss the depth of the character. This character is evil, and he's not just a skillful businessman with a product that happens to be illegal.
He uses and abuses his family for a start. He fixates on a beautiful woman and has to have her. He doesn't discourage his talented nephew from persuing a career in sport, indeed he then employs him in the dirtiest part of his business - retrieving the drugs from the coffins. He uproots his brothers and mother from their simple country life, not because he wants them all to share in his wealth, but because he knows they're the only ones he can trust. He doesn't even speak to them properly, his contempt is palpable.

All of which makes the give in the film at the end where he and Richie Roberts share some moments of understanding even more chilling.

I liked the ending too - the world has overtaken the big Frank Lucas and things are cruder, and more openly bad than he'd dreamed of when he opened those floodgates.



Watch American Gangster without preconceived ideas. While the film is long it never drags. You don't get the sense that you've seen this movie before. It's not Serpico. It's not The Wire. It's not The Sopranos. While much is going on, the story is easy to follow. There is action, but this isn't an "action movie".

Both Denzel Washington and Russell Crowe act convincingly and give depth to their characters.

The film leaves you wanting to know more about about happened to the lead characters. You care about them that much. Now *that's* film making.



great movie



Great film, really enjoyed it.



Registered User
Great Film - Great reviews - advisable must see...

However, after seeing this I was extremely surprised that it was a true story, this I could not believe I had never heard this name before, had anyone else?

I couldn't believe that this was the first time in history I had heard his name in all the 80's and 90's gangster movies it really surprised me. Could it be because of how Lucas earned his fortune?

Anyway fantastic movie and one i definately recomend!