True Romance may have been directed by Tony Scott, but it's got Tarantino all over it. Personally I'd say that - especially with someone who has a specific style like Tarantino - many movies belong just as much to their writer as they do to their director.
On that note, I certainly don't consider Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind to be a Michel Gondry film, even though it is. I consider it a Charlie Kaufman film. Similarly, I associate Being John Malkovich more with Kaufman than I do with Jonze, even though Jonze is quirky on his own.
Because people should take the feelings of directors - and your sensibilities in regards to what makes something a particular person's movie - into account when expressing their opinions?
Right, so Natural Born Killers is a Tarantino film too, right? Give me a break. I don't care about director sensitivity, it's just basic FACTS that I'm looking for. It is not a Tarantino movie....period. It's a Tony Scott movie.
Like I mentioned prior, the script was different; different ending, different structure. Different film.
Is From Dusk Till Dawn a Tarantino movie? No.
Don't even get me started on the inane comment of Se7en being a Walker film.
__________________ "A laugh can be a very powerful thing. Why, sometimes in life, it's the only weapon we have."
The elegance of the compositions kept me interested, but I was unable to engage with the film on an intellectual or emotional level. I'll continue viewing Straub/Huillet films...yet I can't help but feel that their films simply are not for me.
The opening acts promised a masterwork akin to Ford's Young Mr. Lincoln. Walter Huston's performance is one of the best I've seen in ages, and the photography - as typical of Griffith - is terrific. The film, however, doesn't possess any narrative flow; we see several moments in Lincoln's life, but it's all at a distance, and without any semblance of cohesion. There's a masterpiece in here somewhere...just not in its current state.