Happy to. If you're flushed and fancy having a book on your shelf that impresses visitors, then you can pick up his excellent "Good Natured" from amazon for a lot less than I paid for it:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/067...478535?ie=UTF8
De Waal is a serious academic, however and it can be a hard read if you're more used to professional writers.
If you don't feel like shelling out or you have an irrational phobia of paper, he has a few articles online:
http://chronicle.com/free/v48/i09/09b00701.htm
and
http://www.paulagordon.com/shows/waal/
Are a couple google threw up after a casual search. However, I really do suggest you buy yourself "Good Natured", or you might get lucky and find it wedged between a couple of Harry Potter books at your local library.
When it comes to philosophy, well, I have nothing against it. It's always just struck me as futile to debate. I have friends who describe themselves as "Kantian" or "Goetheist" and can argue their stances long into the night, but they never conclude anything or shift their positions because there's no evidence. Without proof or other strong evidence it becomes little more than debating preference for foods. That's not to say Philosophy doesn't have some worth; it can provide stunning glimpses behind the veil of reality and profound insights into the human mind, but give me neuroscience and economics anyday. They may not be perfect, but they're tangible.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/067...478535?ie=UTF8
De Waal is a serious academic, however and it can be a hard read if you're more used to professional writers.
If you don't feel like shelling out or you have an irrational phobia of paper, he has a few articles online:
http://chronicle.com/free/v48/i09/09b00701.htm
and
http://www.paulagordon.com/shows/waal/
Are a couple google threw up after a casual search. However, I really do suggest you buy yourself "Good Natured", or you might get lucky and find it wedged between a couple of Harry Potter books at your local library.
When it comes to philosophy, well, I have nothing against it. It's always just struck me as futile to debate. I have friends who describe themselves as "Kantian" or "Goetheist" and can argue their stances long into the night, but they never conclude anything or shift their positions because there's no evidence. Without proof or other strong evidence it becomes little more than debating preference for foods. That's not to say Philosophy doesn't have some worth; it can provide stunning glimpses behind the veil of reality and profound insights into the human mind, but give me neuroscience and economics anyday. They may not be perfect, but they're tangible.