+3
The time has come! I finally saw this. I don't feel much differently about it after having seen it than before I watched it. Overall, I enjoyed it. I thought it was entertaining, timely, and highlighting an incredibly important issue, which is the prevalence of child sex trafficking. Jim Caviezel's character reminded me of the character he plays in "Person of Interest", so I can see why they chose him for this role and why it would interest him. I don't think I fully understand how and why this film became a cultural phenomenon in the way that it did. Although I did find the cinematography and music to be quite nice, I didn't see anything particularly impressive about the film on a technical level. I also don't see a reason for the controversy as there was similarly nothing particularly objectionable or controversial to me about the film, the characters, or the events the film depicts. I'm talking purely about what is on the screen, not who made it or who it might be about, or what those who made it might be communicating in the media, but what the film itself communicates. I also don't really get why the film was so popular with religious audiences, as the film is not overtly religious in nature. There are a couple of references to God and doing what God calls you to do, but those are the only religious references in the film, and I'm not aware of churches typically doing a lot of work around advocacy on child sex trafficking. Is this a common cause for churches? I can only surmise that the reason for its popularity is because viewers resonated strongly with its message and that it called attention to how the United States is a driver of child sex trafficking worldwide, and that it's something that is not being addressed by policymakers sufficiently and there may have been a desire to use the film to motivate more action to protect vulnerable children.