Gideon58's Reviews

→ in
Tools    





I'd give her a HA! and a HI-YA! Then I'd kick her.
I see you're watching more of Penny Marshall films. I want to do that too. I like her directorial style. You're not the first person to warn that Awakenings is not an easy watch. Both GBG and SilentVamp really liked this film. Do you have any other of Marshall's films to watch?

Yes, I liked Awakenings, but like Gideon said, "it's not an easy watch", so it's not the type of movie that I would want to watch again, but I would definitely recommend it.



Originally Posted by Gideon58
This film is not an easy watch, and unless you're a heartless monster, some tears will be fought during this cinematic journey
I didn't cry.... Lord.



Do you have any other of Marshall's films to watch?
No, there isn't much more on her resume that interests me at this time and I think my disappointment with A League of their Own had a lot to do with that. I discovered recently that I'm behind on my Woody Allen and I haven't watched Trumbo yet either.



Trouble with a capitial 'T'
I want to get back to seeing more Woody Allen films too.

At first I hated them, then once I 'got them' and understand what Woody's style was, I then knew what to expect and started enjoying them. Have you seen many Woody Allen films?



Have you seen many Woody Allen films?
I've seen just about everything he made from the 70's to about 2005...I'm working on his more recent stuff right now. I'm one of the few people on earth who thinks Annie Hall is severely overrated and had no business winning Best Picture of 1977. My favorites include Hannah and her Sisters, Crimes and Misdemeanors, The Purple Rose of Cairo, Manhattan, Deconstructing Harry, Manhattan Murder Mystery, and Midnight in Paris.



Mainly the whole idea that she has to give up her career to find a husband and get married.
More specifically, the fact that a career and anything else takes a backseat to getting married...the girl is offered a lead in a Broadway musical and is so unimpressed with the idea of being a Broadway star because it might interfere with her plan to get married and have babies.



TRUMBO

Dalton Trumbo was one of Hollywood's most popular writers, responsible for the screenplays of such films as Roman Holiday, Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo, Spactacus, and Exodus who found his career come to a standstill during the 1950's because of his political convictions, more specifically, his membership in the communist party. Trumbo was one of several actors, writers, and directors who were blacklisted in the 1950's and not allowed to work in Hollywood. The 2015 film Trumbo is an ambitious character study/docudrama that doesn't provide a lot of insight into the Hollywood blacklisting, but is a blistering look at its effects on Hollywood and the bodies destroyed in the wake of this senseless witch hunt.

This film recounts Trumbo's solid belief in the communist party and how it led to his blacklisting and eventual arrest. As Trumbo returns to society, it is revealed that the only way Trumbo can continue to write is to submit his work under other people's names and allow them credit and most of the pay. The film also recounts Trumbo finding himself dealing with a B movie studio who can't pay him what he is accustomed to but they give him so much work that he has to involve his entire family, head by devoted wife Cleo, to help him churn out one mediocre script after another, which the B studio thinks are masterpieces, but eventually Trumbo is found out when it comes to light that Trumbo wrote Roman Holiday, which won the Oscar for its screenplay, credited to Ian McKellan Hunter. A personal witch hunt begins seemingly spearheaded by gossip columnist Hedda Hopper.

Director Jay Roach, whose only other directorial credit I remembered was Meet the Parents took on a mammoth assignment here and really knocked it out of the park. It is not an easy feat recreating actual history, especially Hollywood history involving household names that I had no idea were part of this witch hunt, but Roach has done exactly that. With a story this sensitive, most filmmakers would feel the need to preserve memories and protect the innocent by disguising some of the major players involved and using composites of several different people to make this story work but he doesn't do that. Along with screenwriter John McNamara, Roach has mounted an often unflattering look at Hollywood during a very ugly period in its history, utilizing most of the real principal players and not apologizing for it. Roach and McNamara also have to be credited for creating an intimate look at a writer and all the eccentricities we've come to expect with such a character...I loved Trumbo in the bathtub with his typewriter, cigarette, and a bottle of scotch on the side...priceless...not to mention the hunt and peck typing.

Bryan Cranston received an Oscar nomination for his riveting performance as the title character, a flashy, charismatic turn that Cranston completely lost himself in. Diane Lane brought more to the role of wife Cleo than was in the script and I loved Louis CK in a star-making turn as a fellow writer named Arlen Hird (whom I suspect was a disguised version of someone else). Oscar winner Helen Mirren made a fabulous Hedda Hopper and there were a trio of terrific movie star impressions that I loved: Michael Stuhlbarg as Edward G. Robinson, David James Elliott as John Wayne, and especially Dean O'Gorman as Kirk Douglas.

The film features flawless production values, reproducing Hollywood in the 1950's with the help of a lot of genuine archival footage as well as clips from Roman Holiday and Sparctacus that only enriched the authenticity of what was going on and the seamless weaving with the drama Roach presents with the help of film editor Alan Baumgartner was a joy to behold.



Trouble with a capitial 'T'
Hey Gideon, glad you liked Trumbo. There's a lot of history crammed into that movie, which I like! You might also like the documentary about Dalton Trumbo, it also called Trumbo (2007).



Trouble with a capitial 'T'
You're welcomed...and...you've recommended me many movies I loved. BTW I did watch and enjoy Malice in Wonderland (1985), I would have never seen it, if you hadn't told me about it.



BTW I did watch and enjoy Malice in Wonderland (1985), I would have never seen it, if you hadn't told me about it.

So glad you enjoyed Malice in Wonderland, Citizen, I knew you would.



JOY
David O. Russell and his muse Jennifer Lawrence seem to have gotten a little full of themselves. They think their fans will just accept anything that they come up with. The premise of the fact-based 2015 drama Joy is a good one, but the story takes too long to get where it is intended to go and once it does, craps all over the central character before winding down to a satisfactory conclusion.

Lawrence plays the title character, a housewife and mother who is at the center of an extremely dysfunctional family, to whom she is endlessly catering and despite the exhaustion this causes, still has her own dreams and aspirations. primarily the fruition of her own invention...a special mop that the user never has to touch and when it's done, the mop head detaches and can be tossed into the washing machine. It is Joy's journey to getting her product on a newly launched cable network called QVC that is the meat of this cinematic journey.

As always, Russell's direction and faith in his leading lady clearly outweigh his talents as a screenwriter...as this film begins we are let into a story of a woman trying to be everything to her dysfunctional family, but it is Joy's journey as a businesswoman that is the story here. We are introduced to her family to make their eventual betrayal of her intolerable, but said introduction could have been done in a more economic fashion.

Once we get to the real story, we are completely behind Joy and absolutely love her and want the best for her and just when we are feeling so good for what is happening to her, the story just craps all over her under the pretense of the woman making bad business decisions and not realizing that a lot of things that happen to her are "just business", a phrase that takes on a really ugly connotation in this story as Joy struggles to find investors, loyalty from QVC and justice when interlopers attempt to cash in on her success.

Jennifer Lawrence's Oscar-nominated performance makes this over-complicated story worth watching and there are expected and unexpected surprises in the supporting cast...Robert De Niro is solid as Lawrence's father but unexpected fun performances also came from Isabella Rosellini as De Niro's rich girlfriend and Joy's primary investor, Virginia Madsen as Joy's dotty mother, who spends her life in her room watching a soap opera and Diane Ladd as Joy's grandmother. There's also a slick turn from Russell rep company regular Bradley Cooper as the QVC executive who gives Joy her chance.

Yes, Lawrence is always worth watching, but if Russell had put a little more care into his overly complex screenplay, this could have been something really special that didn't have me glancing at my watch.



PLEASE DON'T EAT THE DAISIES

An enchanting performance by Doris Day, a clever screenplay, and a solid veteran supporting cast are the primary reasons to check out 1960's Please Don't Eat the Daisies, an episodic comedy with just enough sophistication to keep the film still watchable over 50 years later.

Day plays Kate McKay, the wife of former drama professor turned theater critic Larry McKay (David Niven), who not only has to deal with raising four children, but with a husband who is nervous about his new career, the family's move from a New York high rise to a large house in the country, and the not-too-subtle advances Larry is fending off from an amorous actress (Janis Paige) who Larry ripped to shreds in a review.

Based on a best selling novel by Jean Kerr, screenwriter Isobel Lennart has created a family comedy with just enough adult humor to keep the story viable entertainment for the entire family and not just kids. Charles Walters' breezy direction has a semblance of control on the cast but trusts their talent as well.

This film was a bit of a change of pace for Day, who was one of the few actresses during the 1950's and 60's who was known for playing career women. Funny thing is that even though Kate is not really a career woman, this story still presents her as the smartest character in the story and the antithesis of that old saying, "Behind every great man, there's a woman".

Day is wonderful, as always, and has a surprising chemistry with leading man Niven, fresh off his Oscar win for Separate Tables, shows a surprising gift for light comedy and makes his scenes with Day and Paige work. Also loved Richard Haydn as an oversensitive producer, Jack Weston as a cab driver and aspiring playwright, and Spring Byington as Day's mother, but Day is the one you go away from this one remembering. The film inspired a TV series a few years later with Patricia Crowley in the lead.



Trouble with a capitial 'T'
I love that GIANT flower that's attached to her dress, it looks like it's weighing her down. I've seen this but don't remember the flower was it part of the comedy? BTW, wow she's really trim looking in that black dress!



I love that GIANT flower that's attached to her dress, it looks like it's weighing her down. I've seen this but don't remember the flower was it part of the comedy? BTW, wow she's really trim looking in that black dress!
Actually, the big flower is never even mentioned...and if you really want to see Doris wearing a black dress, check out this scene from Love Me or Leave Me:




FLIRTING WITH DISASTER

Long before he became obsessed with Jennifer Lawrence, director/writer David O. Russell journeyed into Woody Allen territory with an offbeat and unpredictable comedy called Flirting with Disaster which takes a realistic premise to some really illogical and cringe-worthy places but does it all for the sake of entertainment and as pure entertainment, it totally works.

The 1996 film stars Ben Stiller as Mel Coplin, an uptight New Yorker adjusting to the birth of his first child and trying to get his sex life back on track with wife Nancy (Patricia Arquette), who was adopted as a child and does not want to name his child until he meets his biological parents. With the help of a loopy adoption center employee and graduate student named Tina, played by Tea Leoni, Mel learns that his biological mother has been located and has agreed to a meeting, which is the springboard for one of the most outrageously entertaining road trips mounted for the screen, providing constant challenges to Mel and Nancy's marriage and surprises at every turn.

Admittedly, there are things that happen here that I really didn't understand, primarily the fact that Tina accompanies the Coplins on this journey and wants to document the entire thing on film. I would think that an adopted adult meeting his biological parents for the first time would be a private thing for him and his family and having a stranger witness every moment just seems wrong on all kinds of levels, the most disturbing of which is the immediate sexual attraction between Mel and Tina and how they both try to pretend it's not going on. When it turns out that Tina has brought Mel to the wrong woman (Celia Weston), I would think that the woman would have been immediately terminated from her job, or at least told to leave the Coplins alone, but this doesn't happen.

The story even gets murkier with the introduction of a pair of police detectives (Richard Jenkins, Josh Brolin) who are not all they seem and manage to also become tangled into this very confusing web of events. Though these detectives' story doesn't take too long to come to light, we can see it's only going to take an already extremely awkward situation to an even more awkward level here.

This was one of the few times that Russell's writing was as solid as his direction...the script has a very Woody Allen quality to it...extremely appealing characters wrapped up in questionable behavior and often being completely unapologetic about it. Russell has also pulled terrific performances from his cast...Stiller does solid leading man work and the relationship he creates with Arquette is credible and evokes support from the viewer. Alan Alda, Lily Tomlin, George Segal, and especially Mary Tyler Moore, in an eye opening turn, score as the varied bio and adopted parents involved in this convoluted but entertaining story that defies logic and convention from scene to scene but never fails to entertain.