Originally Posted by mark f
I realize that there are plenty of scientists who are willing to genetically engineer a baby, and apparently there are quite a few countries which will leave them alone to do such a thing...
Actually, i think there's only been one case of a 'genetically modified human' being born so far, and that was back in the 80s & hasn't been repeated. (I don't have access to me files right now but can dig out the article later if you want
)
Originally Posted by mark f
...but when the scientist gets into the cell and plays around with the genes, you know that problems will have to arise. I realize that similar problems occur on a daily basis with genetic flaws through sexual reproduction, but allowing a scientist, mad or not, to play God, is a recipe for disaster, at least until many more safeguards can somehow be insured.
If that's a concern to you (&
ensuring novel genetic lifeforms never have novel negative outcomes is always going to be a bit of stretch
) i have to ask whether you've ever lobbied your government to label the genetically engineered ingredients in your food? Coz you should
---
I think the closest we've got to Gattaca-style technology & practices so far is this sort of thing:
Cancer-gene-free baby born
We're now in a position (in the UK) where IVF foetuses may get dumped in the rubbish bin if they carry genes which give them an 80pc or higher chance of exhibiting a deadly or seriously-inhibiting disease. (In this first case, the foetus has been 'cleared' tho - it's Jude Law, not Ethan Hawke
)
I've got a lot of reservations about making choices over someone's future life based on percentages - from the already tricky considerations of 'aborting' an 8-cell foetus with all its shakey odds of making it to full term - to the idea of dumping all the 'Ethans' who still have some odds of having a non-afflicted life. [Of course, we all work on the principle that 'Scientists are wrong 50pc of the time' - but even if their survival stats are accurate, it makes for uncomfortable choices].
At least they're voluntary choices, for the parents involved.
[Augmentation is going to be a whole nother kettle of frothing fish heads tho. Those with the cash to splash and/or the drive are already using attention-focusing pharmaceuticals and the like at university these days. That is most likely the tip of some new lifestyle choices.]