+1
Yeah, I'm not one of the people who loathes it for what it is. I think it works as an over-the-top, fantasy-reimagining of the Howard Hawks epic. It's just that no matter how violent it is (and it's quite violent), it's not really ever as shocking, innovatively-sadistic or Freudian as the original flick. As far as any alleged plot twists, there are none to someone who has seen the original, except perhaps that Pacino didn't suffocate at the end in his mound of coke.
What bothers me the most is how so many kids in Santa Ana, the drug-dealing gangland capital of Cali, think it's the greatest film ever made. I realize that these kids have had a tough life, but looking up to Tony Montana as their default role model certainly doesn't give me any good feelings about their future. Then again, it's amazing how many of them think they have no future at such a young age.
Anyway, back to the movie, it is kinda cool to see F. Murray Abraham in the helicopter a year before he won a Best Actor Oscar for Amadeus. It's also fun to here the dubbed voices of Charles Durning and Dennis Franz at the beginning of the movie during the interrogation scene. Otherwise, I recommend that everyone watch the 1932 movie before they rewatch this one. It might open a few eyes even if you still think that the De Palma version is so much better.
__________________
It's what you learn after you know it all that counts. - John Wooden
My IMDb page