Reply to Topic
Couldn't resist this...
Now the Pentagon tells Bush: climate change will destroy us
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/inter...153513,00.html
Even without the alarming claims the pentagon put forward...
( http://www.guardian.co.uk/climatecha...153547,00.html )
....this is another "great" example of the Bush-admin REFUSING to accept that (a) Climate change is a reality, and (b) that human actions could have any influence on it.....EVEN WHEN his own scientists, and the majority of the world's scientists, assert it to be the case. And these aren't people normally given to assertions in such complex areas.
Here's another recent example of scientific-suppression by the White House, just for fun...
Bush covers up climate research
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/inter...046363,00.html
Now the Pentagon tells Bush: climate change will destroy us
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/inter...153513,00.html
Marshall [who is behind the report's findings], 82, is a Pentagon legend who heads a secretive think-tank dedicated to weighing risks to national security called the Office of Net Assessment. Dubbed 'Yoda' by Pentagon insiders who respect his vast experience, he is credited with being behind the Department of Defence's push on ballistic-missile defence.
Symons, who left the EPA in protest at political interference, said that the suppression of the report was a further instance of the White House trying to bury evidence of climate change. 'It is yet another example of why this government should stop burying its head in the sand on this issue.'
Symons, who left the EPA in protest at political interference, said that the suppression of the report was a further instance of the White House trying to bury evidence of climate change. 'It is yet another example of why this government should stop burying its head in the sand on this issue.'
( http://www.guardian.co.uk/climatecha...153547,00.html )
....this is another "great" example of the Bush-admin REFUSING to accept that (a) Climate change is a reality, and (b) that human actions could have any influence on it.....EVEN WHEN his own scientists, and the majority of the world's scientists, assert it to be the case. And these aren't people normally given to assertions in such complex areas.
Here's another recent example of scientific-suppression by the White House, just for fun...
Bush covers up climate research
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/inter...046363,00.html
).
:
]