Rate The Last Movie You Saw

Tools    





God Told Me To, 1976 (A)

A thriller that opens with a man shooting dozens of civilians from a water tower, claiming God told him to. The movie follows a detective's quest to make sense of the event, and a succession of other events that all seem related to it.

Great movie. A sort of fast-paced slow-burn thriller, if you will. Things keep happening, with next to no downtime. Every minute is put to use. It's difficult to talk about it without spoiling anything, but I would definitely recommend it.
Yes, it is pretty great.



West Side Story. I liked it a lot. That Spielberg fella is goin places.



Bright light. Bright light. Uh oh.

Ghost Tropic (Bas Devos, 2019)
5/10
Dilemma (Peter Maxwell, 1962)
6/10
The New Adventures of Tarzan (Edward A. Kull, 1935)
+ 5/10
Faya Dayi (Jessica Beshir, 2021)
5.5/10

Ethiopian legend recreated in a poetic "documentary" involving villagers whose life revolves around khat.
Bon Cop Bad Cop (Erik Canuel, 2006)
+ 6/10
Ste. Anne (Rhayne Vermette, 2021)
5/10
Project Space 13 (Michael M. Bilandic, 2021)
5.5/10
Encounter (Michael Pearce, 2021)
6/10

Marine veteran/ex-con Riz Ahmed takes his sons on a "mission" to escape an alien invasion and leaves a wake of violence in his path, followed by the police.
Europa '51 (Roberto Rossellini, 1952)
6/10
Titanic II (Shane Van Dyke, 2010)
+ 4.5/10
Four in the Morning (Anthony Simmons, 1955)
5.5/10
Just Don't Think I'll Scream (Frank Beauvais, 2019)
+ 6.5/10

Fast-paced collection of words from the director combined with images from films he edited together to tell his very personal story of loneliness.
Murder Can Be Deadly AKA The Painted Smile (Lance Comfort, 1962)
5/10
The Bachelors (Kurt Voelker, 2017)
+ 6/10
Murder on Approval (Bernard Knowles, 1955)
+ 5/10
The Unforgivable (Nora Fingscheidt, 2021)
6/10

After serving 20 years for murder, Sandra Bullock is paroled and tries to contact her sister who was very young when she went in prison and has subsequently been adopted.
Silent Night, Deadly Night (Charles E. Sellier Jr., 1984)
5.5/10
Santa Claus (René Cardona, 1959)
4/10
Spinning Man (Simon Kaijser, 2018)
6-/10
June Again (JJ Winlove, 2021)
- 6.5/10

After spending years in a nursing home with dementia, (ex-)business owner Noni Hazlehurst has a brief moment of lucidity and visits her family - first trying to take charge and then being more understanding of their situation.
__________________
It's what you learn after you know it all that counts. - John Wooden
My IMDb page




Silent Night, Deadly Night (Charles E. Sellier Jr., 1984)
5.5/10

The second one is worth checking out. About half of it is recycled footage from the original, then it turns into a top notch trash movie with the "Garbage Day" scene stays at that level until the end.


Parts 3 and 4 aren't bad either, although 4 might be a challenge if you don't like bugs. Neither of them have much to do with the first two.



The trick is not minding
The second one is worth checking out. About half of it is recycled footage from the original, then it turns into a top notch trash movie with the "Garbage Day" scene stays at that level until the end.


Parts 3 and 4 aren't bad either, although 4 might be a challenge if you don't like bugs. Neither of them have much to do with the first two.
Eh. None of them are worth checking out, to be honest. I’ve seen the first, maybe 20 minutes of the second before I got annoyed with the rather long flashback to begin it, and The Initiation when I was maybe 12, I think?

Probably would rather watch Nightbeast over these and that’s saying something.
😳



I forgot the opening line.


Sansho the Bailiff - (1954)

Within a 6 month period, from November 1953 to April 1954, Yasujirô Ozu's Tokyo Story, Akira Kurosawa's Seven Samurai and Kenji Mizoguchi's Sansho the Bailiff were released in Japan. A pretty significant 6 month period for Japanese cinema. Well, I've finally seen Sansho now - a very humanistic film, and one that seems to be tugging at our emotions from everywhere - from a mother's love for her children, a father's love - the love between brothers and sisters and finally the love people can have for one another if only they're taught to treat each other with respect. All this comes without naivety, because the World Mizoguchi presents us with is also despairingly cruel, and full of violence, greed and indifference to human suffering. All very powerful sentiments, but they're also interwoven into a great story with sublime filmmaking skills, perfect pacing and naturalistic acting. It all hinges on a lesson a father (a governor, who is exiled for not following cruel regulations) teaches his son : That a person without mercy isn't human, and a mother's reach extending beyond the sea on the wings of a song. My faith in humanity is restored for a while longer.

9/10

Foreign Language countdown films seen : 54/100
__________________
Remember - everything has an ending except hope, and sausages - they have two.
We miss you Takoma

Latest Review : Le Circle Rouge (1970)



Eh. None of them are worth checking out, to be honest. I’ve seen the first, maybe 20 minutes of the second before I got annoyed with the rather long flashback to begin it, and The Initiation when I was maybe 12, I think?

Probably would rather watch Nightbeast over these and that’s saying something.
😳
Part 3 is directed by Monte Hellman and stars Bill Mosely and Laura Harring.

Part 4 is a Brian Yuzna film with gore effects by Screaming Mad George.

I adamantly disagree with your assessment.



The trick is not minding
Part 3 is directed by Monte Hellman and stars Bill Mosely and Laura Harring.

Part 4 is a Brian Yuzna film with gore effects by Screaming Mad George.

I adamantly disagree with your assessment.

Ok.



I forgot the opening line.
Yup def, thought it was a nice watch dehaans was great. Has he done any other good flicks?
I saw him in Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets, Luc Besson's 2017 Sci-Fi adventure in which he returns to his explosively imaginative and stylish Fifth Element kind of moviemaking. It's not bad at all :





My Fair Lady, 1964

Eliza (Audrey Hepburn) is a poor flower-girl on the streets of London, who one day comes to the attention of phonetics specialist Henry Higgins (Rex Harrison). In conversation with new friend Colonel Pickering (Wilfrid Hyde-White), Higgins brags that he could transform Eliza into a lady just with the power of refining her language. The two butt heads as Higgins is determined to pass Eliza off as upper class in even the most elite society.

Sometimes a film leaves me feeling so torn--with both extreme love and extreme loathing for elements of it--and this is exactly such a case.

There are so many amazing strengths to this film. The costume design is absolutely amazing, and it pairs with set decoration that equally sumptuous. The outfits are breathtaking, and my favorite sequence by far was the one that takes place at a racetrack, where the use of black and white in both the costuming and the set took on almost an abstract quality. There is an open, theatrical quality to the sets, and at times the film looks more like a painting than a moving picture. When you add in some excellent choreography and staging--such as the wealthy people watching the horse race with absolutely no emotion--it feels truly next level.

The music is also really solid. At last, I know where the tune "With a little bit" that has haunted my brain for 30 years came from. Many of the songs are very memorable, and I have to give props for some of the more bold slant rhymes, like rhyming "Budapest" and "ruder pest".

The story itself, from Shaw's play and something I've also seen in Pygmalion, is engaging. It raises a lot of interesting questions about social hierarchy and how elements of someone's life outside of their control--like the way they have learned to speak--can have a tremendous impact on their outlook in life. The film keenly observes the way that Eliza becomes stranded between two worlds as she takes on the appearance of someone raised in wealth but doesn't have the life experience. One of the best parts of the film (well, the play and also the earlier film) is when Eliza has a mannered conversation with some wealthy race attendees . . . but ends up delivering a story of the death of her drunken aunt, remarking repeatedly on the mysterious disappearance of said aunt's new straw hat.

There were two things that really dinged the film for me, one was more minor, but one was much more significant.

The more minor complaint was that I just wasn't into the speak-singing that Harrison did through the whole film. I can see this totally not bothering many people, but it just sort of irked me every time.

But the bigger complaint, and one that kind of soured the film for me, was the way that it revises Shaw's ending to the story. Now, I've already been through this particular mourning, because Pygmalion did the exact same thing. And would a major big-budget production have the guts to actually show a woman exiting an unhealthy relationship? Of course not! He really loves her, guys! Or, I mean, he's "gotten used to her face."

It's just trash, I'm sorry but it is. Eliza, in the final act of the film, is finally able to stand up to Higgins--the man who has verbally and physically abused her--and then he pulls the incredibly manipulative tactic of saying "Oh, well now that you've stood up for yourself I find you attractive!". She QUITE RIGHTLY smiles at him in derision and walks out on him. . . . for an hour or so. The entire point of the character arc for Eliza is that she finally achieves autonomy, having both the drive and now the socially-acceptable exterior to survive on her own. But the film is afraid to let her have this autonomy for more than about 10 minutes of run time. What only makes it all worse is that Eliza has a very nice suitor (a young Jeremy Brett, SWOON!) who, you know, isn't 20 years older than she is. Her vision is to work in a flower shop and be married to him and it's such an act of cowardice that the film has to pull a hard right turn from this ending.

Eliza comes back to him because . . . ? The film makes a big to-do about how sad Higgins is that Eliza is gone, but he is actively disrespectful toward her. (His argument that he's disrespectful to everyone and thus practices equality falls incredibly flat for me, especially when it seems that he never says anything derogatory to many of the other characters but unendingly calls Eliza "baggage" or a "hussy" or a "crushed cabbage leaf"). His song about how we wishes women were more like men is just baffling. It's increasingly clear that he wants Eliza around because he's used to her and she's a part of his routine that makes his life easier. I found all of his remarks to and about her in the last act deeply unromantic, and I felt increasingly annoyed knowing that the hand of the Hollywood studio was going to send her right back into his arms. Yes, this was three paragraphs about how much I hate the ending, but for me it is a tremendous fail and it sinks the last 20 minutes.

If the film had the guts to stick with the original ending, this would probably be a near perfect score for me. But as it neuters one of the most powerful dynamics of the play, it's relegated to "eh" status for me. I can't imagine watching it again.

I watched this, since it's been lined up on my schedule for a while now. Wikipedia has this to say about the end :

"He enters his house feeling lonely, reflecting on his callous behaviour and missing Eliza so much that he turns on his grammophone and listens to her voice. Suddenly, Eliza reappears at the door and turns it off to catch his attention. It is clear that she will marry Freddy but offers friendship, Higgins seemingly consents to this."

Now, I didn't get that either. I thought she was returning to enter some kind of romantic relationship with Higgins, but I guess she never really states what she's doing.

I enjoyed the songs as well - so many that I already knew - and they've been going on and on in my head all day. I got to see a few numbers without Audrey Hepburn being dubbed - and lets just say that thank goodness she was dubbed. I agree that the costumes were great - and that the scene where she relates the death of her aunt and the suspicious disappearance of the straw hat was a standout. The whole Ascot part of the film was great. I thought Rex Harrison as Prof Higgins was excellent. I wasn't as enthused as you were by the sets and choreography - I'm no expert on musicals, and I'm only starting to get a few under my belt, but I expect more colour and movement in a movie musical. It felt a little stage-bound still to me. But all up, I didn't think it was too bad. I wasn't infuriated by the ending - just befuddled, especially now. Perhaps that's what they were going for - hoping that people would take from the ambiguity whatever they wanted.



Eh. None of them are worth checking out, to be honest. I’ve seen the first, maybe 20 minutes of the second before I got annoyed with the rather long flashback to begin it, and The Initiation when I was maybe 12, I think?

Probably would rather watch Nightbeast over these and that’s saying something.
😳
Stay the hell away from my son!



The trick is not minding


My Fair Lady, 1964

Eliza (Audrey Hepburn) is a poor flower-girl on the streets of London, who one day comes to the attention of phonetics specialist Henry Higgins (Rex Harrison). In conversation with new friend Colonel Pickering (Wilfrid Hyde-White), Higgins brags that he could transform Eliza into a lady just with the power of refining her language. The two butt heads as Higgins is determined to pass Eliza off as upper class in even the most elite society.

Sometimes a film leaves me feeling so torn--with both extreme love and extreme loathing for elements of it--and this is exactly such a case.

There are so many amazing strengths to this film. The costume design is absolutely amazing, and it pairs with set decoration that equally sumptuous. The outfits are breathtaking, and my favorite sequence by far was the one that takes place at a racetrack, where the use of black and white in both the costuming and the set took on almost an abstract quality. There is an open, theatrical quality to the sets, and at times the film looks more like a painting than a moving picture. When you add in some excellent choreography and staging--such as the wealthy people watching the horse race with absolutely no emotion--it feels truly next level.

The music is also really solid. At last, I know where the tune "With a little bit" that has haunted my brain for 30 years came from. Many of the songs are very memorable, and I have to give props for some of the more bold slant rhymes, like rhyming "Budapest" and "ruder pest".

The story itself, from Shaw's play and something I've also seen in Pygmalion, is engaging. It raises a lot of interesting questions about social hierarchy and how elements of someone's life outside of their control--like the way they have learned to speak--can have a tremendous impact on their outlook in life. The film keenly observes the way that Eliza becomes stranded between two worlds as she takes on the appearance of someone raised in wealth but doesn't have the life experience. One of the best parts of the film (well, the play and also the earlier film) is when Eliza has a mannered conversation with some wealthy race attendees . . . but ends up delivering a story of the death of her drunken aunt, remarking repeatedly on the mysterious disappearance of said aunt's new straw hat.

There were two things that really dinged the film for me, one was more minor, but one was much more significant.

The more minor complaint was that I just wasn't into the speak-singing that Harrison did through the whole film. I can see this totally not bothering many people, but it just sort of irked me every time.

But the bigger complaint, and one that kind of soured the film for me, was the way that it revises Shaw's ending to the story. Now, I've already been through this particular mourning, because Pygmalion did the exact same thing. And would a major big-budget production have the guts to actually show a woman exiting an unhealthy relationship? Of course not! He really loves her, guys! Or, I mean, he's "gotten used to her face."

It's just trash, I'm sorry but it is. Eliza, in the final act of the film, is finally able to stand up to Higgins--the man who has verbally and physically abused her--and then he pulls the incredibly manipulative tactic of saying "Oh, well now that you've stood up for yourself I find you attractive!". She QUITE RIGHTLY smiles at him in derision and walks out on him. . . . for an hour or so. The entire point of the character arc for Eliza is that she finally achieves autonomy, having both the drive and now the socially-acceptable exterior to survive on her own. But the film is afraid to let her have this autonomy for more than about 10 minutes of run time. What only makes it all worse is that Eliza has a very nice suitor (a young Jeremy Brett, SWOON!) who, you know, isn't 20 years older than she is. Her vision is to work in a flower shop and be married to him and it's such an act of cowardice that the film has to pull a hard right turn from this ending.

Eliza comes back to him because . . . ? The film makes a big to-do about how sad Higgins is that Eliza is gone, but he is actively disrespectful toward her. (His argument that he's disrespectful to everyone and thus practices equality falls incredibly flat for me, especially when it seems that he never says anything derogatory to many of the other characters but unendingly calls Eliza "baggage" or a "hussy" or a "crushed cabbage leaf"). His song about how we wishes women were more like men is just baffling. It's increasingly clear that he wants Eliza around because he's used to her and she's a part of his routine that makes his life easier. I found all of his remarks to and about her in the last act deeply unromantic, and I felt increasingly annoyed knowing that the hand of the Hollywood studio was going to send her right back into his arms. Yes, this was three paragraphs about how much I hate the ending, but for me it is a tremendous fail and it sinks the last 20 minutes.

If the film had the guts to stick with the original ending, this would probably be a near perfect score for me. But as it neuters one of the most powerful dynamics of the play, it's relegated to "eh" status for me. I can't imagine watching it again.

I think you and I spoke about this film before, but I agree. The ending should have been kept the same. Eliza deserved far better, and the ending undermines her newfound confidence.



Aka Team Society?!??!?!! *Adds to watchlist*
Should add Faust to that list too! My least favorite of the bunch but it’s like if Spawn were made by… Well, Yuzna and George. It’s screaming mad!



I won't rate it because I didn't finish it. Tried A River Run Through It. Man it was just dull to me. Don't have as much time as I used to with my new gig so I can be as patient as I'd like. Had to give up on it. Just didn't do it for me. Maybe I'll try and finish it one day. Got to see my boy JGL as a pup though ha.
__________________
I came here to do two things, drink some beer and kick some ass, looks like we are almost outta beer - Dazed and Confused

101 Favorite Movies (2019)



"He enters his house feeling lonely, reflecting on his callous behaviour and missing Eliza so much that he turns on his grammophone and listens to her voice. Suddenly, Eliza reappears at the door and turns it off to catch his attention. It is clear that she will marry Freddy but offers friendship, Higgins seemingly consents to this."

Now, I didn't get that either. I thought she was returning to enter some kind of romantic relationship with Higgins, but I guess she never really states what she's doing.
I think that the ending strongly suggests that she is returning to him instead of going with Freddy. Shaw fought against a Higgins-Eliza happy-end pairing as late as 1938. He sent the 1938 film version's producer, Gabriel Pascal, a concluding sequence which he felt offered a fair compromise: a tender farewell scene between Higgins and Eliza, followed by one showing Freddy and Eliza happy in their greengrocery-flower shop. Only at the sneak preview did he learn that Pascal had finessed the question of Eliza's future with a slightly ambiguous final scene in which Eliza returns to the house of a sadly musing Higgins and self-mockingly quotes her previous self announcing, "I washed my face and hands before I come, I did".

I wasn't as enthused as you were by the sets and choreography - I'm no expert on musicals, and I'm only starting to get a few under my belt, but I expect more colour and movement in a movie musical. It felt a little stage-bound still to me. But all up, I didn't think it was too bad. I wasn't infuriated by the ending - just befuddled, especially now. Perhaps that's what they were going for - hoping that people would take from the ambiguity whatever they wanted.
Were you familiar with the play's original ending? I think that that's a lot of why it bothers me so much. To even have the film end with her returning to him---on any grounds--is a slap in the face to the whole theme of her emancipating herself from his control. And it was changed specifically because audiences (and producers) wanted a "happy" ending. As if a person finally taking control over their own life isn't happy enough. No, if there's a main man and a main woman, we must shove them together by the end.

As for the sets, I didn't see most of it as a classic "singing and dancing musical", which might sound weird. But the horse-racing sequence is a great example of this. The people are meticulously choreographed, even if it's not a "dance number".

I think you and I spoke about this film before, but I agree. The ending should have been kept the same. Eliza deserved far better, and the ending undermines her newfound confidence.
Yeah, it's a bummer. It would be great to see a faithful adaptation of the play at some point.

Should add Faust to that list too! My least favorite of the bunch but it’s like if Spawn were made by… Well, Yuzna and George. It’s screaming mad!
Watchlist . . .. growing . . .. growing. . .



I forgot the opening line.
Were you familiar with the play's original ending? I think that that's a lot of why it bothers me so much. To even have the film end with her returning to him---on any grounds--is a slap in the face to the whole theme of her emancipating herself from his control. And it was changed specifically because audiences (and producers) wanted a "happy" ending. As if a person finally taking control over their own life isn't happy enough. No, if there's a main man and a main woman, we must shove them together by the end.
I went into yesterday almost 100% ignorant about My Fair Lady ("By George I think she's got it!!" was the extent of my knowledge) - I didn't even know "Wouldn't It Be Loverly", "With a Little Bit of Luck", "I Could Have Danced All Night" and "Get Me to the Church on Time" were from this musical, despite knowing the songs. I never noticed one scintilla of romance between Eliza and Higgins during the film - but it seemed to be suggested though, as an afterthought towards the end of the whole movie and left the question of Freddy hanging in the air with no resolution. Poor Freddy. He just gets forgotten about. I haven't seen either version of Pygmalion either, but I'd like to.



A bit of a western marathon:

Power of the Dog: A brilliant character study of toxic masculinity that feels at once akin to both of the previous Campion films I’ve seen, The Piano and In the Cut in its exploration of not only the impact of said toxicity but its allure. Never before have footsteps felt so oppressive. 5/5

Posse: A movie consumed with its music video style that gets in the way of its impressively ambitious narrative. It starts very strongly with a Spike Lee-esque intro where the great Woody Strode addresses the lack of black narratives in westerns. Unfortunately, the rest of the film is not as engaging despite its talented cast. Mario Van Peebles is a solid director and gun slinger but the stand out performance is Billy Zane, who between this, Titanic and especially Demon Knight, may be the greatest unsung villain actor of the 90s. 3/5

The Harder They Fall: An homage to Django Unchained and Posse in equal measure but doesn’t seem to have nearly as much to say as either, despite its insistence that it does. It’s a shame as this one is far more accomplished stylistically, with some of the best set design I’ve seen all year, bringing a gorgeous and colorful aesthetic that makes the bloody violence pop. The cast is also incredible. If the narrative were as strong and ambitious, it would have been among the best modern westerns around. 3/5

All The Pretty Horses: A faithful adaptation to a masterpiece of a novel in almost everything except tone and atmosphere. Apparently, Weinstein chopped an hour and changed it to a traditional score so it doesn’t FEEL like McCarthy. It’s a shame because it’s still a well made and fine story that simply lives too deeply in the shadow of its source to have a proper impact. 3.5/5

The Stalking Moon: A minor masterpiece in the genre. It swaps rousing action for a horror/thriller style in which Gregory Peck is tasked with protecting a once abducting woman and her half Indian son from the boy’s notorious father. In many ways, the film feels akin to a slasher, with various characters being picked off by the mysterious attacker. It’s intense and highly effective. 4.5/5

The Outlaw: This was a fairly weak attempt at telling the story of Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid (and Doc Holiday for some strange reason?). It’s really only notable for some unintentional comedy, questionably intentional gay subtext, and of course, the notorious cleavage of Jane Russell that had director Howard Hughes fighting the Hays Codes and forever altering just HOW MUCH we were allowed to see. If this were 80 mins, it might’ve been a nice, breezy, twisty romp but it drags at 2 full hours. 2.5/5

Jeremiah Johnson: A nigh perfect western. Milius penchant for stoic, gruff masculinity is a perfect match for Pollack’s retrained approach to the material. It’s gorgeous, authentic, and at times, upsettingly effective in its depiction of the frontier. One of my new favorites in the genre. 5/5