+2
A disturbing story came out that the U.S. Supreme Court (while trying to decide about Biden's proposed vaccine mandates for the private sector) disseminated multiple complete falsehoods about the virus that are currently known to be untrue even by the majority of the public.
1. Omicron variant is "just as deadly" as Delta variant. False (Omicron is more contagious, but far less severe with its symptoms being compared to the common cold).
2. Vaccine is the best way to prevent spread & transmission - thus mandates are completely understandable and warranted. False (vaccines have now been shown to have little to no effect on transmission, neither do they provide immunity from contracting the illness - they have been shown to be only effective on the severity of the illness).
3. "More than 100,000 children have been hospitalized by COVID-19, with many on ventilators." Completely False. (No one even knows where judge Sotomayor came up with this claim or these numbers: children have been the least effected by the virus directly with less than a few thousand currently hospitalized throughout the entire nation - with the vast majority of those not hospitalized FROM Covid, but who only happened to test positive for Covid as they are hospitalized for OTHER reasons. Even Dr. Fauci has confirmed these facts multiple times.)
There were more fallacies, but I have to agree with those who said that you'd think Supreme Court Justices would be better informed on the facts about a virus that is the subject they were about to rule on, at least to the point where they'd avoid repeating things that were already shown and known to be false some time ago especially when they are utilizing that very misinformation they stated as a basis for their decisions.