0
Evil Dead 1 was a film that had charm, this came from its low budget i always felt. Evil Dead 2 had a slightly bigger budget and remade the first, making the best in the series. Army of Darkness had an even bigger budget and was a disappointment, hence being calling AOD instead of Evil Dead 3, so it was distanced from the series.
Now if they reamke Evil Dead 1, i'd hope it would go like from 1 > 2 and not 2 > 3.
The fact its being remade doesnt bother me yet. Takashi Shimizu has made a career remaking 'Ju-On'/'The Grudge' and Hideo Nakata (original Ringu director) i believe is directing The Ring 2 (which i dont think is a remake though) and these haven't offended me. As long as those 3 are involved (Raimi, Tapert, Campbell) im happy asit doesnt seem like Hollywood is stealing the film. Im quite miffed though as to why Raimi is going back to it after stating his focus on Spiderman opposes to a sequel to ED or any further involvement in the franchise.
I would rather see a sequel tbh, but with rather good reamke of Dawn of the Dead, im not too p!ssed. Although the change in budget for DOTD didnt afect the plot as the original had a far bigger budget than ED.
Another popular point about Evil Dead was how it got caught up in the 'video nasties' banning (i think this was a BBFC thing so Britain only (?)) and this controversy definitely added to its appeal.
Perhaps Bruce just needs the work?