I don't see why. Makes perfect sense to me. It would be accurate to say that person maybe doesn't want a discussion, however.
And here comes the interesting part about psychology into the game:
Why do people participate in a discussion, they actually don´t really want to participate in?
It´s the same with people who go into a thread, just to rant about it while telling forum-moderation to close it. Why can´t they just IGNORE the thread (as well as certain users?)?
Fair enough, but if so, you must be used to people occasionally misunderstanding you, yeah?
Oh, that can happen for sure, but unlike in reality, there are no (real) consequences to me, if that happens. People seem to take this whole internet-forum-stuff a little too serious, in my opinion.
I think that's probably all that's happening here: the first post sounds fairly aggressive, even if you maybe did not intend it that way.
Oh, i was completely aware of using just one stupid word ("mentally weak", actually two words!) to get more attention and motivate people to participate!
In other words, I don't think anybody's making you "the target." I think the post itself does that.
If i am becoming the target, that is perfectly fine (who says it wasn´t my intention, to become the "target"?), but people tend to behave "funny" (the Joe-Pesci-Funny way!
) as soon they log into the WWW and also tend to say things, which are looking pretty contradictory to how they behave, which i in turn find pretty amusing at times.
Indeed, but if we decide to be controversial or provocative (or even just blunt) in order to get responses, we have to be ready for those responses to reflect that..
Do my posts look like the one from a person who has trouble "defending himself" while being scared of being "attacked" let alone being the "target"`?
And yes of course, i can be a real ass-hat at times, but everyone who logs into the WWW should be old, adult (or "mentally strong") enough to handle a certain "heat". Especially in times like today, with toxic-places growing like crazy, certain people should really stay miles away, i in fact even told close friends that i wouldn´t suggest them to register on certain places and if so, they should be aware of a few things.
Personally, I think any topic that "needs" that kind of extra push to generate discussion is probably not worthwhile, in part because the discussion it generates is usually, like this, about itself more than the topic. But that's just my opinion.
A forum thrives on discussions and users who actually PARTICIPATE in discussions rather than to just read and move on. So to make long things short:
If i would own a forum, i would in fact "hire" trolls from time to time, to cause several controversial and heaty discussions, to make users participate who would otherwise just read and move on.
Or in other words:
There is nothing more poisonous for forums, than users who don´t participate in discussions while the actual "work" of moderators should be trying to hold the right balance of BOTH forum-regulars and so called "trolls".
Moderators who "ban all trolls" haven´t understood a thing and are mostly those kind of forum-moderators who only do the job to "have something to say" at least once in their lives, while actually hurting the forum more than they help it. Also, there are already more "trolls" within forum-moderators (REDDIT is the best example) than it could be acceptable.
LMFAOROFL this made my day.