I wanted to start this thread so that people who bother to go beyond a movie and check the hard facts can discuss them here. Talk about who or what the movie was based on, Talk about whether or not the movie portrayed the scientific facts correctly if they eluded to them, Talk about what theories were all about.... that kind of thing. Here's an example of what I mean
A Beautiful Mind: This movie is based on the true life story of John Nash and in it, he makes a contribution to Economics which won him an nobel prize in 94. If you were wondering what exactly did he discover?, you have come to the right place because I will try to explain what I think of it after reading more on the man after watching this movie.
His theory specifically is called non-cooperative game theory which suggest "rational behavior for interactive decision problems". In any game the parties strive to maximize their points, score, etc... by making choices, and each person's "payoff" depends on the decisions chosen by ALL parties. And because of the fact that you and I are contestants in the same game your goals would be the same as mine. Therefore I redefine my goals to "win" relatively rather than "ideally". This was explained by the blonde and the brunette in the whole dating secnario. According to the theory... there is an "uncooperative-fixed point" whereby no one can gain any more unless someone is "willing" to take less. Meaning if Man#2 settles for the brunette MAN#1 can go after the blonde without the same implications if they both had tried their luck.
A Beautiful Mind: This movie is based on the true life story of John Nash and in it, he makes a contribution to Economics which won him an nobel prize in 94. If you were wondering what exactly did he discover?, you have come to the right place because I will try to explain what I think of it after reading more on the man after watching this movie.
His theory specifically is called non-cooperative game theory which suggest "rational behavior for interactive decision problems". In any game the parties strive to maximize their points, score, etc... by making choices, and each person's "payoff" depends on the decisions chosen by ALL parties. And because of the fact that you and I are contestants in the same game your goals would be the same as mine. Therefore I redefine my goals to "win" relatively rather than "ideally". This was explained by the blonde and the brunette in the whole dating secnario. According to the theory... there is an "uncooperative-fixed point" whereby no one can gain any more unless someone is "willing" to take less. Meaning if Man#2 settles for the brunette MAN#1 can go after the blonde without the same implications if they both had tried their luck.
__________________
And like that
.... he's gone
And like that
