I think it's quite arrogant for Anglophones to say that all this enormous culture has the same style while their far less diverse and sophisticated comics and animation is not a "style".
First, I don't recall anyone saying American culture didn't have a style. Sounds like another straw man. And second, while it does have broad stylistic tendencies, it stands to reason that a less homogeneous culture--particularly one that has a tendency to import talent from the rest of the world--would have a less discernible style.
Being recognized as asian would only mean that the western comic authors havent used the same set of styles.
...which was the entire thing being argued about. Remember, you dismissed the idea that they have different styles, because you had to rule that out to leave bigotry as the only remaining explanation. Yet here, you admit they do use a different "set of styles." QED.
I see so now I have an "unhealthy emotional attachment".
You told me criticizing your favorite shows was like criticizing someone's religion. You're saying you think that's healthy?
To me it sounds like it's obviously insulting to say that the bulk of the world's comics have the same style just because they are made in the same country.
See, look what just happened: "just because they are made in the same country." You added that part. Saying something generally has a similar/noticeable style is not the same thing as saying it
had to have that style simply because of where it was made.
Every argument I've had with you has gone this same way: an extreme opening statement, followed by questioning that reveals it isn't warranted, followed by you exaggerating or misrepresenting what was said to make that initial statement look more reasonable. The only explanation I can come up with is that you don't respond to what people actually say (let alone mean), you just respond to how it makes you feel. So if someone dismisses some animated film you love, it doesn't matter if they gave you zero reason to suspect their dismissal was based on bigotry: it makes you feel bad, therefore they must have meant it in some horribly malicious way. As I've said many times, this can all be traced back to a simple failure of empathy: placing an outsized importance on your own feelings and interests relative to those of others.
You are judging something you don't know in a state of complete arrogance: you said that K-On! popularity is derived from sex appeal of its character's who are minors (implying its popularity was "pedophilia" in that broad sense of being attracted to minors).
False. Read the post again:
I don't see any basis for your (fairly provocative) claim that you have to think all men are pedophiles to find some of these images sexual. Nor is suggesting that the sexual aspect is part of the appeal the same thing as saying everyone who likes it is a pedophile.
This is me explicitly saying that having sexuality play some role does
not mean it's just for pedophiles, or that liking it makes you one. So, hilariously, this was you exaggerating someone's claim again, me explaining that the claim was much more nuanced...and then you misremembering it later as lacking nuance! That's an
incredible commitment to rationalization that I have to think is borderline willful.
I will not answer to further arguments from you (too much time wasted).
You're not answering them now, so this won't be much of a change.