Batman vs Superman Interpretation - Spoilers

Tools    





Another souless flashy CGI oriented movie designed to get you to worship human nature (satan) vs truth (G-d).

In this movie superman is continuously being called G-d in which he gladly accepts the title and doesn't rebuke it one bit. Coincidence? First of all, superman is not G-d but an alien.

Batman is represented in the movie as (human). Subliminally this movie targets your subconscious by making you want to destroy G-d (superman).

Well guess who dies in the end....



Clearly the nonsensical ravings of a lunatic mind.
Instead of name calling how about you try rebuking with an opinion? You might come off smarter that way.



Another souless flashy CGI oriented movie designed to get you to worship human nature (satan) vs truth (G-d).

In this movie superman is continuously being called G-d in which he gladly accepts the title and doesn't rebuke it one bit. Coincidence? First of all, superman is not G-d but an alien.

Batman is represented in the movie as (human). Subliminally this movie targets your subconscious by making you want to destroy G-d (superman).

Well guess who dies in the end....
Interesting.



Instead of name calling how about you try rebuking with an opinion? You might come off smarter that way.
He has a point.



Originally Posted by Levitucus
In this movie superman is continuously being called G-d in which he gladly accepts the title and doesn't rebuke it one bit. Coincidence?
No! The filmmakers are blatantly disregarding Superman's scripture!



The jews of hollywood may be born with jewish blood but in no way shape or form do they represent judaism and G-d but instead are trying to destroy G-d. It's mad.

Maleficent is another movie where the villain is now the super hero.



SC, The name is "Ubermensch", which is German for "Satan".
Oh okay. Hello. Nice to meet you.



I haven't seen the movie, but recently read Superman: the Golden Age (a compilation of Superman's first comics).

They talk about Batman being harsh in his early days (what with carrying a gun and throwing criminals off roof tops)... well Superman wasn't much better. He tortures men into confessions by hurling them into the air or dropping them from great heights before catching them. He let's some people he tosses fall and presumably hit the ground off-panel.
He let's pilots in air planes he's smashed fall to their deaths. Rather than turning criminals over to the police, he threatens their lives or intimidates them into leaving town.
He causes a mine cave-in to trap socialites (most of whom are just innocent guests at a dinner party) so he can teach the mine owner a lesson!
In one story he kidnaps an innocent college football player, DRUGS the kid with needles so he won't escape(!!!), while Superman impersonates the young athlete so he can win a football game that bookies are trying to rig.

Frederic Wertham wasn't so far off when he said that Superman solved problems through physical might & intimidation (and thus was closer to ideals of fascism). Granted Superman (like Batman) evolved beyond these extreme & dangerous methods, but he was pretty much an irresponsible vigilante who endangered lives with his powers in the beginning.

What's this have to do with anything? Just the whole comparing Superman to G-d thing. The parallels between Superman, G-d, Jes-s, Mos-s, and the Nietzchean Ubermensch or "Overman" that played a role in the N-ZI concept of the Aryan Super M-n have been going on for decades.