Rate The Last Movie You Saw

Tools    





The Blue Dahlia - 1946 noir starring Alan Ladd and Veronica Lake and directed by George Marshall with an original screenplay by Raymond Chandler. When I finished this my first thought was that it was altogether convoluted. But then I felt I was being a little hard on it. Until I researched it and that actually turned out to be the case. Alan Ladd was one of Paramount studios biggest stars so when he was called back to serve during the war the studio panicked and started production with a half finished script. Chandler had to complete it under a tight deadline, sometimes providing a couple of pages a day during the shoot. This brought on a bad case of writers block which only exacerbated the situation. He was also forced to change the ending by the Naval War Office in order to "avoid disparaging an American serviceman".

So it was quite literally convoluted. And the script also relies on so many coincidences that they're eventually a distraction. But it does have a great noir vibe with Ladd a returning WWII veteran accused of shooting and killing his wife. And he and Lake do make for an appealing couple, proving that This Gun for Hire was not a fluke. The rest of the cast is solid with Hugh Beaumont, William Bendix, Doris Dowling and Howard Da Silva. It might be a somewhat flawed movie scriptwise but there's still plenty for noir fans to love. 80/100



Der Fan (1982) Genre: Horror.

A teen girl is idolizing pop singer “R”. writing letters, letting him know of her devotion to him. As she wait for him to reply, everything else in her life falls into the background. I saw the version dubbed to english, and it did not ruin the style, i feel.


8,5

The Faculty (1998)

Rewatch. Was not aware Robert Rodriguez directed this one. Also, the cast is nice.
Elijah Wood, Usher, Salma Hayek, Josh Harnett, Jordana Brewster, Famke Janssen, Robert Patrick, Danny Masterson.
7,5.



The latest power supply: boundless space, it's OK



Please Quote/Tag Or I'll Miss Your Responses
Lord Of The Flies - 7.5/10
Another reason Google sucks. When you type in the movie, you get some ****ty re-make. Respect the original, even if it isn't as good (which has never been the case).

I have seen this movie before, and after noticing it would be appearing on TCM, I decided it would be a good idea to see it again, since it has been a handful of years since initially viewing this.

I'm wont to like movies with simple stories, but encompass society. The movie is very political/social.

There are two groups that appear shortly after the movie begins. They realize they are stranded, but think "We'll survive, we're English" and mention democracy and have a vote on how to operate. The choir boys (initially dressed in black robes) are led by Jack (who I will call "Group #2"), but Ralph is elected as Chief (who I will call "Group #1"). They decide to have meetings to decide on how they are structured, and future decisions, using the conch shell for communication; to call out, and to hold as if it were a microphone and to have some order, with everyone else is silent while the one who holds the conch is listened to before further discussion takes place.

When Group #2 comes with the dead pig, Ralph looks a little defeated that it had nothing to do with his leadership and just sits and watches until one of the younger kids brings Ralph a big piece of pork (sounds like politics, eh?).

Jack who is the de-facto leader in part because he has a knife, kills a pig and they finally have something substantial to eat. Jack has the other choir boys responsible for keeping the fire going, but they become negligent and the passing aeroplane does not notice because the smoke has dissipated.

A nice young lad is told "Damn you for being weak", and like any society, those who aren't "useful" will not enjoy the benefits others have, enabling a caste system.

Jack seems emboldened after his bloodthirsty expedition, and breaks away by telling the others, "MY hunters will protect you from the beast, which could be a ghost" after one boy looks around and sees nothing after Piggy claims a giant squid could never come on land, to which Jack can only reply with "Who cares what you think, Fatty?" and smashes one of Piggy's spectacles, making him half-blind. Jack goes on and on about this mysterious "beast" - the age of misinformation and religion - having an answer to consolidate power by having a solution for something unknown, something that doesn't exist, but the boys are gullible, just like many who fall prey to superstition. Even on the hunt, the boys use face paint as if they were native warriors. Ralph even sticks the head of the dead animal on a stick as a tribute to the gods.

During a meeting, Ralph talks about rules, and Jack quickly interjects with "We hunt, who cares about the rules?" and mentions how Piggy can't do anything, with Ralph yelling back wondering how a boy with one-eye can do anything. Welfare. Not all people are equal, and to this day, it's a constant argument between the haves and have-not and what is fair when it comes to the distribution of scarce necessities. Piggy is subsequently told by Ralph to watch the little ones, and with some intelligence and imagination, Piggy tells the boys stories to keep them occupied. Even during the most dire moments and circumstances, entertainment is always necessary to function normally.

When Ralph is alone with Piggy, he says he should quit, after it seems he has lost his power. Despite Ralph telling the others in the beginning of Piggy's nickname after being told to keep it a secret, Piggy urges Ralph to keep going as leader, probably because he is defenseless and being closer to the chief is for his own survival.

As an aside, one boy says aloud, "Grown-ups would have tea, discuss, and everything would be all right" as if the mere fact being over a certain age were to solve every problem, including theirs, man vs. nature and man vs. man.

At night, a boy sees a dead pilot but as he tries to tell Group #2, they figure (in their frenzy) it must be the beast, and instead kill him, developing the swarming behavior not unlike some who stormed The US Capitol on January 6th. Ralph is troubled and calls it murder, while Piggy tries to ignore the fact and quickly changing the subject, but scared of even using the word "murder" and attributing it to an accident.

Even though both sides need each other, Jack challenges the power of Ralph and anyone else with comments like "Who says so?" and how "My tribe does what I want".

Group #2 steals Piggy's glasses, and when Piggy takes the conch, the hunters disregard the rules, and one of the wicked hunters rolls a boulder from a hill that kills Piggy, whose body washes away into the ocean, which only leaves Ralph, who is being pursued by the others, until he stumbles upon the feet of a man who is part of the rescue crew.

It's important that the characters are all children - who have yet to be conditioned by the adult society - because they are more prone to behave by instinct, instead of influence. I never saw the re-make of this movie, but it would have been an interesting sociological experiment to survey the disparity in behavior had the children been younger, and perhaps less interested in ego, but perhaps with other problems, such as further immaturity and co-operation.

It might have been a nice idea (maybe as an epilogue or the introduction) to show the children as they were before this incident, and to show how certain events can change a person. We certainly see less division and more uniting initially before the groups become more fractured.





Official Secrets (2019)
Good movie.





Very strange movie. I enjoyed it.
__________________
I’m here only on Mondays, Wednesdays & Fridays. That’s why I’m here now.



Watched Togo earlier in the evening. Such a fine fine movie. Even with not a lot to show, this had me on the edge at some key moments (which were well done) and melted my heart in the end.



Can't even see where the knob is


Beyond Bedlam - ★★☆☆☆
- Vadim Jean, 1994 -
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

A bit better than people give it credit for, but still not exactly good. The atmospheric visual clinicality and a solid cheeseball performance by Keith Allen certainly work in its favor. Unfortunately, the lame script and flailing, long-winded direction do not. This thing has no energy whatsoever, nor any noteworthy substance to account for it. Still, I kind of found myself getting pleasantly lost in its weirdo dreaminess, at times.

-------------------------------------------------------



Parasite -
- Bong Joon Ho, 2019 -
---------------------------------------

First rewatch. Funny thing is that the film's only disappointing aspect for me - the payoff of the "bad smell" arc during the climax - only got more pronounced on my second viewing, whereas the rest of the film firmly solidified itself as some of the best material produced in the last 30 years or so. I had also kind of forgotten how lush and consistently beautiful the film looks, with every shot meticulously crafted, inserted and highlighted, to the point where you just can't wait to see the next shot in al its contextual glory. I'm not usually one to whine about cinematography snubs, but this one definitely should've gotten at least a nod in that category.


-----------------------------------------



It's in the Air - ☆☆
- Anthony Kimmins, 1938 -
-----------------------------------------------

Cute little feelgood comedy. In fact, it's so feelgood, that it somehow manages to completely ignore the rising tensions at the time, its subject matter and settings notwithstanding. No, this movie is only interested in being cute and adorable. And that it is.
__________________
How am I supposed to find someone willing to go into that musty old claptrap?



Originally Posted by Dr. Badvibes;21728


-------------------------------------------------------

[IMG
https://www.globaltimes.cn/Portals/0/attachment/2019/2019-08-14/90885886-862e-4aed-b433-3404a02459ae.jpeg[/IMG]

Parasite -
- Bong Joon Ho, 2019 -
---------------------------------------

First rewatch. Funny thing is that the film's only disappointing aspect for me - the payoff of the "bad smell" arc during the climax - only got more pronounced on my second viewing, whereas the rest of the film firmly solidified itself as some of the best material produced in the last 30 years or so. I had also kind of forgotten how lush and consistently beautiful the film looks, with every shot meticulously crafted, inserted and highlighted, to the point where you just can't wait to see the next shot in al its contextual glory. I'm not usually one to whine about cinematography snubs, but this one definitely should've gotten at least a nod in that category.


-----------------------------------------
Personally, I LOVED Parasite even more on the second watch and am planning a third.
After my second watch, I upped my original rating of
to



Can't even see where the knob is
Personally, I LOVED Parasite even more on the second watch and am planning a third.
After my second watch, I upped my original rating of
to

Good! Personally, I think the film is a masterpiece.



Wicked Little Things (2006)

A very 80s B-horror. Zombie children wreak havoc from their mine, and single mother with two daughters tries to manage. Not a single original idea, but still moderately entertaining.
__________________



Catch Me If You Can (2002, Steven Spielberg)

Top 5 Spielberg for me, a director I'm a lot colder on than most (while still acknowledging his undeniable craftmanship). He directed this one the same year as Minority Report, and both feel like interesting reflections on the tragic events of 9/11 from the year before, where Minority Report seems to comment on the super surveillance future that was ahead, with Catch Me showing a past where a teenager could cross borders pretending to be an airline pilot and fake passports without much problems, something that would be impossible in current times. Obviously, both movies had already been in production for a long time, so maybe (most likely) I'm just reading too much into it.

Christopher Walken is incredible in this, so is Tom Hanks, but I think this might be one of the best uses of DiCaprio in a movie. The trick behind *most* great DiCaprio performances is that, deep inside, he is just a scared little boy. Despite this being a rather charming and joyous caper about a young con man imagining himself a superhero or even James Bond, it's also a sad tale of a kid from a broken family who gets tired of being smarter than everyone else, tries to enter the real, adult world, treats it like a game (and plays it well) until he has to face the consequences of it.


4/5



Catch Me If You Can (2002, Steven Spielberg)

Top 5 Spielberg for me, a director I'm a lot colder on than most (while still acknowledging his undeniable craftmanship). He directed this one the same year as Minority Report, and both feel like interesting reflections on the tragic events of 9/11 from the year before, where Minority Report seems to comment on the super surveillance future that was ahead, with Catch Me showing a past where a teenager could cross borders pretending to be an airline pilot and fake passports without much problems, something that would be impossible in current times. Obviously, both movies had already been in production for a long time, so maybe (most likely) I'm just reading too much into it.

Christopher Walken is incredible in this, so is Tom Hanks, but I think this might be one of the best uses of DiCaprio in a movie. The trick behind *most* great DiCaprio performances is that, deep inside, he is just a scared little boy. Despite this being a rather charming and joyous caper about a young con man imagining himself a superhero or even James Bond, it's also a sad tale of a kid from a broken family who gets tired of being smarter than everyone else, tries to enter the real, adult world, treats it like a game (and plays it well) until he has to face the consequences of it.


4/5

I love this movie, never tire of watching it, my favorite DiCapriio performance