The "cancel-culture" wouldn´t be called "cancel-culture" if they would just criticize people.
They exactly know what they are doing and you can be sure, if a person loses its job because of certain comments on its social-media page, then it wasn´t a "terrible accident" nor a "unhappy misunderstanding" in the most cases.
So that´s why they have gotten their name "cancel-culture"!
They "cancel" other people and also make sure that those people are getting "canceled" from others who are in fact not even a part of the "cancel-culture" (or unaware of it) and that´s what is making that "cancel-culture" so dangerous, because people can become an active part of it, not even being aware of it.
Are you familiar with "causality"?
If you push a bigass boulder and it starts rollin down the mountain, crashing into a car and causing 5 dead people.
Who has to be blamed?
The boulder?
The 5 people driving the car?
The car itself?
You?
Or was it the mountain who caused 5 people to lose their lives?
If the comment from a social-media user causes a company to fire someone, then it was the social media user who caused another person to lose its job, not the company. It is really easy as that and not overly complicated.
They exactly know what they are doing and you can be sure, if a person loses its job because of certain comments on its social-media page, then it wasn´t a "terrible accident" nor a "unhappy misunderstanding" in the most cases.
So that´s why they have gotten their name "cancel-culture"!
They "cancel" other people and also make sure that those people are getting "canceled" from others who are in fact not even a part of the "cancel-culture" (or unaware of it) and that´s what is making that "cancel-culture" so dangerous, because people can become an active part of it, not even being aware of it.
Are you familiar with "causality"?
If you push a bigass boulder and it starts rollin down the mountain, crashing into a car and causing 5 dead people.
Who has to be blamed?
The boulder?
The 5 people driving the car?
The car itself?
You?
Or was it the mountain who caused 5 people to lose their lives?
If the comment from a social-media user causes a company to fire someone, then it was the social media user who caused another person to lose its job, not the company. It is really easy as that and not overly complicated.
Because all you are saying still doesn't place an ounce of responsibility in the acts of those who effectively censor or fire Shane Gillis. Firing him is still a decision made and kept by SNL. And you can justify it in that the environment of social media "forced" the company to make that decision, that doesn't change that it was their choice to do so and that by talking about the nebulous "cancel culture" and shifting the blame to the collective the company that actually fired, censored and/or arguably mistreated one of their employees is not held accountable at all.
Also yes, what people call "cancel culture" is often just criticizing online. Because that's what most people can do. Not even 8 million social media users saying specifically that some guy deserves to be fired can break a contract made between a company and its employee. They don't have that kind of power. They just make a noise that the companies or employers, in their own, interpret in order to make the decisions they should absolutely be held accountable for, because what they do with their workers is their responsibility.