0
Not releasing Batgirl seems like an odd decision, given that Warners spent nearly $100 million on it, and it's reportedly nearly finished. How bad could this film possibly be that they've decided for it to be trashed completely? I think Zazlav's idea to have a narrative arc to the films that is planned out 10 years in advance is a good idea. I don't really know why, since I am not a huge fan of the comic book movie genre, but Warner Bros DC hasn't really had anywhere near the same level of quality, or success as Marvel has had with films like the Avengers. The success that they have had is mostly Batman oriented, with "Joker" making $1 billion, and "The Batman" making something like $800 million, but those films are outside of the multi-verse concept, and the separate stand alone movies that they have made have mostly been not at the same level of quality as Marvel's. "Batman v. Superman" wasn't well done, and didn't meet expectations, and neither did "Justice League," for example. Marvel has had missteps as well. "Black Widow," which I did see, wasn't a particularly good film. I'm wondering, for those of you who do follow these films, why do you think DC really hasn't succeeded at the level that Marvel has? They seem to also have characters people like to build films around, but their attempt to duplicate Marvel's approach really hasn't worked, and I'm wondering why.