Gatsby's New and Improved Flick Critique

→ in
Tools    





Master of My Domain
Inside Out (2015)




Directed by: Pete Docter
Starring: Amy Poehler, Mindy Kaling, Bill Hader, Lewis Black, Phyllis Smith


Joy tries to get things organized by group hugging.

One of the greatest strengths and redeeming qualities of Pixar studios is that their films have a magical, sincere ability of unifying generations of movie-goers with pulsing, bright ideas and superb writing. It also usually takes night of living toys, superheroes, monster in a corporate world like ours, but this time around, it's entirely human-based, exploring characters remarkably similar and relate-able to us, while throwing in psychological insights, because who knows, what if our brain is really controlled by minuscule voices deep inside the core?

The plot is pretty much the most simplistic one Pixar has ever devised. It is a comedy-adventure, and a memory related disaster film revolving around Riley (Kaityln Dias), a girl living in Minnesota with her mom (Diane Lane) and dad (Kyle MacLachan), happy as can be alongside a best friends and a passion for hockey, until disaster strikes. Riley's dad sets up a new business, and as a result, the entire family is forced to move to San Francisco, a literal death sentence full of broccoli pizza and traffic congestion. What's worse, instead of Riley trying her best to fit into a new place, she keeps reminding herself of what she doesn't have anymore.

This story begins from not the moment of new arrival, but from the very beginning. As Riley is born, receiving a blinding operating room light, so are her emotions. Joy (Amy Poelher) is the first one to emerge, but in order, suddenly Sadness (Phyllis Smith) pops up, and then Fear (Bill Hader), Disgust (Mindy Kaling), and Anger (Lewis Black - great casting choice btw). But these five are not solely attributed to their names that describe them. In this film, in place of humans, they are the most human aspect of this film. They are not limited to a certain emotion or personality, and it makes them similar to us, diverse, flamboyant, and dynamic, not static, individual that each has a role in society, but in this case, Riley's thoughts and actions. Because of our differences, we bicker and fight over each other's opinions, but in the end during a time of happiness or oppression, we are united, and slowly friendships start to happen. The emotions in Riley's obviously want to tear each other apart, but it shows signs of caring for one another and a real, benevolent bond.

Nothing can be perfect though, as there is a level of class among the fantastic five. Joy is the clear leader, she is always bright and energetic, a workaholic whose only purpose in being active all day is to keep Riley a jubilant being. Fear, Disgust, and Anger are in the middle, and Sadness is a noticeable bottom rank, an outcast. She keeps ruining Riley's happy memories by touching them, due to obvious instinct, thus she is mostly in quarantine, away from the control panel.

When Riley arrives at San Francisco in an unsatisfactory mood, the five emotions try to do anything they can to cheer her up, But a chain of events leads to core memories being contaminated by Sadness' touch, and Joy and Sadness are sucked into an outside area, inhabited by islands representing Riley's personality, and rows of shelves containing illuminating balls of memories are endless.

The animation is a whole new level of greatness, as always, but at first it is not easily noticed. The world of Inside Out takes place in an incomplete, premature, unstable, and brightly surreal atmosphere looming over various "lands". Therefore, the animation is not crystal clear and Joy and Sadness feel out of place, because they are somewhere that shouldn't be accessible to them. Graphics are also cleverly used to give off a mystifying, endless feel with bizarre objects surrounding in no particular order, the order is spontaneous and sporadic, placed whenever Riley gets caught up in something new, or crumbles down when she loses interest. When we get to explore an abstract thought processing room, high quality technology is used to create one dimensional geographical shapes that could have easily existed 20 years ago. Sometimes less is more, proven in this film.

The humor comes from (1) an immense amount of content anyone can sympathize with and (2) twisting and toying around with the existing, Pixar-esque creativity at it's finest. Inside Out is about the voices inside our head, but it is also a casual, poignant, and warm look at the progression of life and growth. One example is a young Riley refusing to eat peas, behind that is Fear, Disgust, and mostly Anger. The build-up to the joke is great, and it leads to a satisfying finale, but it certainly is a bit predictable. Then later one comes a running gag, a consistent pop-up of an annoying but helplessly addictive gum commercial. Is there anyone who can't react to that without a slap on the knee and laughter? Amusement comes from the very basic piece of life which is yes, sadly, flashy ads. Second, twisting the old comes from mostly "ImaginationLand" and the outskirts. Areas similar to ImaginationLand has been portrayed countless times in animation, but never has there been a conveyor belt and a mini factory next to it that produces imaginery boyfriends (they have a striking resemblance to Justin Beiber!), shouting "I'll die for Riley!". And a train of thought, that expression, becomes an actual "train of thought".

As the perilous journey of Joy and Sadness continue, they meet a variety of characters, the main one being Bing-Bong (Richard Kind), Riley's old imaginary friend. For years he has waited and wandered, maintaining his own silly and naive self, hoping that one day Riley would remember him again. He still keeps a rocket that Riley once made with Bing-Bong, now only existing in mere faint fragments of the mind, but complete as an imagination, which runs of song power, and can take people to the moon.

Just the presence of Bing-Bong is bone-crushingly heartbreaking. It reminds me of the song 'More Than a Feeling" by Boston (which was in fact used in the trailers, excellent choices of music). Actually, it may describe the entire film. Bing-Bong can, "still recall as I want to know" (lyric from the song), but Riley no longer has interest. On the flip side, Riley can remember all the wonderful, spotless things about Minnesota, but reality doesn't allow her to go back in time. Inside Out is a film that can be described as a sparkling, energetic collision of emotions and memories, they crumble, and then are shaped in a different form, improved, as we grow up and enter chaotic society, and when we look back, "the faces fade as the years go by", but the experiences, the touching moments and the heart-pounding thrill rides of bonding and separating, ceaselessly beating back and forth under a lonely night view remain inside us, and complete us. It is obvious that the writers studied actual psychology, instead of movie versions. Inside Out captures the sublime beauty of all of the above in simply 102 minutes.

All the forgotten experiences, according to the film, are chucked into a dark, deep pit to vanish into smoke, a pit located in the middle of everything, like a black hole. Joy and Bing-Bong end up in there, and inside Joy realizes the importance of Sadness, and how it plays a role in giving perfect birth to spotless Joy. It is one of the finest twists in recent movie history, a twist I can only describe as plain brilliant. In enter your trembling throat and travels deep into your heart and melts it down, and know it all makes sense. Suddenly, old memories tucked deep inside rows of spherical fragments of life, started to ignite, and like of series of classroom lights turning on in order, from back to front, kept advancing towards me in a blazing, hope-filled craze and hit me in a weak point, and I broke down and started crying.

(Spoilers in the below paragraph only)

I also cried, yet again, when things come to full circle, and Riley lets down everything she kept from her parents. There is a moment of silence, both on screen and with the audience, and i wanted to smack the idiot who kept consuming buttery popcorn. Riley's parents have their moment of silence too, then embrace with impeccable, absolute paternal love, the three seemed to be shielded by an invincible air of pure love and care. I broke down, but this time it was a bit different. i tried to hold back my tears a bit the first time, but on the second touching moment, it was after the film taught me the virtue of possibly the most disliked emotion. I let it all out. But it was not the type of tears flowing when let's say, your pet dies. rather these tears were a mix of every emotion to ever exist, a bundle of transcendence. It was filled with pure joy, thankfulness, and it felt exceptionally good. The holding back of tears and sadness, a common teaching by the unforgiving reality, had made me forget how good it is.

A quick note to parents before i end my review: When your child seems down in the dumps. don't try to interfere with endless amounts of evident-less enthusiasm. Instead, sit down next to him/her an ask what's wrong, and try to understand, hug and cry together. Sadness, anger, disappointments, and even a short run-away from home (I'm an expert on that), a sign of independence and maturity. It is what forms a well-rounded, emotionally sturdy person, I am so lucky to have gone through all that, and it didn't turn me into a regular criminal who raids houses for crack.

Btw, even if you didn't like the film, don't leave in a hurry, because there are some amusing scenes venturing into the mind of various people and even animals. My favorite one is the teacher one, probably because I'm one myself.

+




Excellent review of my favorite movie of the year. I gave it the same score and cried a couple times too. Great stuff.
__________________
Letterboxd



Master of My Domain
Excellent review of my favorite movie of the year. I gave it the same score and cried a couple times too. Great stuff.
Yay. Hopefully we'll be able to spread the good word about Inside Out in time so a lot of MoFos can watch it. Glad you liked my longest (I think) review on this thread.

Edit - I forgot to add BGM for this review:




Master of My Domain
Brilliant review again Gats, really looking forward to watching this with my daughter. Glad you rated it so highly.
Have fun your daughter SL. Hopefully she can connect to Riley in some way.
So this is The Numbskulls, then? I used to like them, so maybe I'll give this a go sometime.
Wow, I finally convinced HK to do something normal!

And lol yeah it's The Numbskulls alright, but it's way better, imagery, writing and all. Trust me.



Master of My Domain
Excellent review. What did you think of Lava?
I have mixed feelings about it. My expectations for Pixar shorts had been set up too high after Feast (I've seen it around 5 times). Lava was a sweet little appetizer before the main course, but didn't do much for me. I predicted the entire story within a minute and the singing was a bit inappropriate at some moments IMO. Hopefully we'll get better ones in the future.
+



Feast isn't Pixar.
(I liked it a lot too, but it's Disney.)

I felt about the same as you did about Lava. Though I liked it a hell of a lot better than their last effort, The Blue Umbrella or my least favorite of them all Boundin'. My favorite is probably still the classic Knick Knack, but Partly Cloudy, For the Birds, and Tin Toy aren't far behind.



Master of My Domain
Feast isn't Pixar.
(I liked it a lot too, but it's Disney.)
I entirely blame Disney. Ever since they bought Pixar there have been a lot of mediocre films, and made me think Feast is Pixar.
I felt about the same as you did about Lava. Though I liked it a hell of a lot better than their last effort, The Blue Umbrella or my least favorite of them all Boundin'. My favorite is probably still the classic Knick Knack, but Partly Cloudy, For the Birds, and Tin Toy aren't far behind.
I'd probably rank The Blue Umbrella along with Lava, but I agree about Boundin' being the worst. My favorite is Geri's Game or Presto, and I like your favorites too.



I love Presto as well.

This probably how I'd rank their theatrical shorts:

Knick Knack
Partly Cloudy
For the Birds
Tin Toy
Presto
Lifted
Luxo, Jr.
One Man Band
Geri's Game
Red's Dream
Lava
La Luna
Day and Night
The Blue Umbrella
Boundin



Another very good review, Gatsby. I wasn't sure if Inside Out would really work or not based on its premise. It seemed a little high concept for a movie geared toward children. Maybe it still is, but at least the grown-ups are really digging it. Pixar hasn't been up to their usual standards as of late, but judging by all the positive reaction to Inside Out, it's their best film in years.

A quick note to parents before i end my review
I don't think a notorious child abuser such as yourself should be doling out advice to parents.



Master of My Domain
Another very good review, Gatsby. I wasn't sure if Inside Out would really work or not based on its premise. It seemed a little high concept for a movie geared toward children. Maybe it still is, but at least the grown-ups are really digging it. Pixar hasn't been up to their usual standards as of late, but judging by all the positive reaction to Inside Out, it's their best film in years.
The high concept won't be much of a problem for kids, IMO. It doesn't take a basic understanding of psychology to enjoy Inside Out, which is another great thing Pixar did. The film is not only about how the mind works, explained with great writing and imagination, but just a fast paced adventure inside a bizarre, fun world, sort of like Alice in Wonderland.
I don't think a notorious child abuser such as yourself should be doling out advice to parents.
At least I have better qualification than a mad clown who jerks off to National Geographic specials and Drill Brill. You sick bastard.



I repped your review of The Third Man because I appreciate every effort people put into writing out their thoughts. But I don't think it's one of your best reviews, it seems like you are wandering in the shadows not sure what to say, and when you say something you kind of let up halfway. You give some facts here and there but it's like you're a bit uncertain in terms of this film - kind of like the film itself.

I don't share your enthusiasm with this film, I thought it was pretty entertaining, but it wasn't until a certain someone showed up that I gained interest, which also seemed to be the point where everything began to tighten up. Before that the movie didn't really have my attention, it was trying to be interesting but failed in my opinion, trying to be clever for the sake of cleverness and I didn't always see a point with the choices made by the director. When ***** shows up, it gets pretty great and ends with an extraordinary finale, but that's like an hour in before it does anything to me.

honest rating of the film -
+



I repped your review of The Third Man because I appreciate every effort people put into writing out their thoughts. But I don't think it's one of your best reviews, it seems like you are wandering in the shadows not sure what to say, and when you say something you kind of let up halfway. You give some facts here and there but it's like you're a bit uncertain in terms of this film - kind of like the film itself.

I don't share your enthusiasm with this film, I thought it was pretty entertaining, but it wasn't until a certain someone showed up that I gained interest, which also seemed to be the point where everything began to tighten up. Before that the movie didn't really have my attention, it was trying to be interesting but failed in my opinion, trying to be clever for the sake of cleverness and I didn't always see a point with the choices made by the director. When ***** shows up, it gets pretty great and ends with an extraordinary finale, but that's like an hour in before it does anything to me.

honest rating -
+
Hope that's a movie rating and not a review rating, otherwise you're just a meaniehead.



Master of My Domain
I repped your review of The Third Man because I appreciate every effort people put into writing out their thoughts. But I don't think it's one of your best reviews, it seems like you are wandering in the shadows not sure what to say, and when you say something you kind of let up halfway. You give some facts here and there but it's like you're a bit uncertain in terms of this film - kind of like the film itself.
You're absolutely right, my review is exactly like the film itself.I love The Third Man for it's atmospheric ambiguity, and that's how I tried to write my review. Throughout the film there is no certain "answer", and there is no certain aspect that makes the film brilliant. It's a mix of shadows, jaunty music, suspicious figures and hidden eyes. I tried to capture that by not saying "A equals B therefore C".

I don't share your enthusiasm with this film, I thought it was pretty entertaining, but it wasn't until a certain someone showed up that I gained interest, which also seemed to be the point where everything began to tighten up. Before that the movie didn't really have my attention, it was trying to be interesting but failed in my opinion, trying to be clever for the sake of cleverness and I didn't always see a point with the choices made by the director. When ***** shows up, it gets pretty great and ends with an extraordinary finale, but that's like an hour in before it does anything to me.

honest rating of the film -
+
Maybe because you expected a bit more action and tight suspense leading up to the reveal of you-know-who? The cinematography, and haunting backdrops were more than enough for me.

I've always considered The Third Man a flip side of Casablanca, that's another reason why you might not have enjoyed it. Make sure to give this film a rewatch.



You're absolutely right, my review is exactly like the film itself.I love The Third Man for it's atmospheric ambiguity, and that's how I tried to write my review. Throughout the film there is no certain "answer", and there is no certain aspect that makes the film brilliant. It's a mix of shadows, jaunty music, suspicious figures and hidden eyes. I tried to capture that by not saying "A equals B therefore C".
I guess that's why I don't agree with you nor the film. I think it reveals the opposite of greatness. Even though I liked Birdman, it is also one of those modern versions of what The Third Man tried to do as well. Try to be inventive, try to be new, try to be different, but it doesn't make me care or connect to it, and it doesn't come across as brillant filmmaking either, per say.

Maybe because you expected a bit more action and tight suspense leading up to the reveal of you-know-who? The cinematography, and haunting backdrops were more than enough for me.
Didn't expect either, but just a good story. I think it was fumbling while yelling "look at my cleverness", but that's just me.

I've always considered The Third Man a flip side of Casablanca, that's another reason why you might not have enjoyed it. Make sure to give this film a rewatch.
It that a sly hint at because I have Casablanca in my top ten you have a good reason to why I don't liked and/or understand the film?

I will definitely give it a rewatch. My rule is always watch a film at least twice before a final judgement can be made. I thank you for recommending it to me, since I've wanted to watch it for a long time and I'm happy I finally got around it. I loved the last 40 minutes or so, especially that last chase was absolutely phenomenal. So thanks again.



Bright light. Bright light. Uh oh.
The director, Carol Reed, wasn't trying to do anything new with The Third Man. His previous two films, Odd Man Out and The Fallen Idol, were full of Dutch angles and offbeat storytelling and thrills. It was, however, the apex of those films, with Graham Greene's sparkling screenplay full of witty wordplay. Almost every line has multiple meanings, sometimes because Vienna is a divided city and people just don't understand each other. Yet Joseph Cotten finds one of his biggest fans of his dime novel westerns in the British sergeant played by Bernard Lee, who later became famous as the original M of the James Bond series. Cotten and the major played by Trevor Howard hardly even listen to what the other one says because their version of the truth is so locked in stone. Of course, neither knows who the third man is. These are just part of the reasons why I find the entirety of The Third Man so special.
__________________
It's what you learn after you know it all that counts. - John Wooden
My IMDb page



Wow Gatsby, your review of Inside Out is masterful! I can easily tell that you put every bit of effort into it. Also, I fully agree with the rating. Excellent work!