+5
The world produces 6,500 movies per year. Of which only 150 movies are made by Hollywood studios. So 99% of the Oscar prizes go to these 2% of the movies.
Anyway, prizes are stupid since they are esclusive and contingent on highly imperfect information and biased voters. In the case of the Oscars the voters are always the people employed by the Hollywood studios, these are overwhelmingly male, white, average age is 63. Still, it's true that pictures that win Best Picture are generally very good with some exceptions (Chicago was a weaker one but still pretty good movie) they reflect the tastes of this type of people.
Other forms of listing movies are better. For instance, on the IMDB the too 250 movies list is perhaps a much better list of movies than the best picture Oscars winners since it offers movies of many types and varieties that can suit many tastes and demopgrahics. Although it's true it has its own biases (the top 250 has US movies also overrespresented as well as newer movies) but it's biases feel way less strong and is a more democratic list of movies. For instance, never has a science fiction movie won the Oscar, why? Because the type of people who vote for the Oscar don't like this genre. Same for other "genre" movies. While the top 250 IMDB has many science fiction movies.
Anyway, I think that we should just stop paying attention for the Oscars instead of complaining about it. It's just a publicity stunt by a bunch of big movie studios.
Last edited by Guaporense; 01-29-18 at 03:21 AM.