The idea of a concensus "underseen" list is completely flawed. If you get thirty or twenty or even six MoFos to vote for it, that rather proves it isn't underseen. On the other hand if a movie really and truly is underseen and you are one of the few enlightened people who appreciate it, by logic that title will die in terms of collecting enough points to make the collective. Catch-22. Any movie that is underseen will never get enough votes and any movie that gets a lot of votes is clearly seen by plenty.
So start a thread of the movies you think are underseen, start a discussion, and if you express your passion well enough others may check it out. And you'll probably discover that, shocker, in a community of film fans there are others of us who have seen and even like the flick. But a MoFo List? It is a non-starter.
So start a thread of the movies you think are underseen, start a discussion, and if you express your passion well enough others may check it out. And you'll probably discover that, shocker, in a community of film fans there are others of us who have seen and even like the flick. But a MoFo List? It is a non-starter.
Highest points, but anything that gets more than three votes is disqualified?
(I wonder if the bottom fifty will be fifty-way tie of everyone's 1-pointers).