Originally Posted by Django
Comparing LOTR with the original Star Wars trilogy, I think Star Wars has more of a plot and character development than LOTR ever had. The plot of the Star Wars movies is hardly arbitrary, because the motivations of the characters are quite explicit and the characters are also more fully explored and developed. So... in short, LOTR was fun... but still, kind of superficial, ultimately.
Just my opinion, though!
I'm sorry, but I'm still laughing over this comparison. Has anyone in his right mind ever accused the Stars Wars trilogy of plot depth and deep character development? Ever? Isn't that one of the basic flaws of the series -- that the plot and characters are fairly flat and two-dimensional? It's a fun, campy series that we go see for some basic reasons (special effects, ongoing basic story and characters we enjoy), but we don't go to these movies for epic tales of glory and deep emotionally moving scenes.
To try to say that the Star Wars movies had these things AND THE LOTR SERIES DID NOT is, to me, the height of absurdity. I looked for the smileys that would indicate you were kidding, but I found none.
Having said that, I'm still laughing at your comparison.
By the way, no one has mentioned the obvious comparison of the LOTR series to Wagner's RING opera. Tolkien acknowledged this debt, and this alone would dump LOTR into the mythology category, since it's easy to compare it to, ummm, a MYTH in an opera.
Just a few stray thoughts this morning....