Nice image. However, if you could tell me where I failed specifically. Unless "fail" means you disagree.
You of all people should know what it feels like to present a radical stance.
It would seem that I do know what it's like to present a radical stance, but I really don't. The thing is, I (usually) think that I'm putting forward a straight forward, common sense pov. It's isn't until everyone jumps on the WTF bandwagon that I discover that, maybe, people see things differently on said point.
I guess I said "Fail" in both meanings. I do disagree, but I also can't see or think of any substanciating factors for this, beyond the perverse (and, by perverse, I mean outside the usual boundries):
If there isn't enough of a biological difference, and let's be honestly, there isn't. Our bodies can do practically anything. The idea of a skinny, emaciated woman is attractive precisely in order to advance an artificially normalized biological difference. It pleases men to see women in a state of withering away, because it naturally reaffirms their perceived physical and emotional dominance.
Unless I'm completely misunderstanding you (which is possible, as I've already explained) you think that's little to no difference between the male and female body (which is wrong all the way down to a molecular level) and that we (as men) find underweight/skinny/emaciated women attractive as it excenuates our own form. Added to this, you say that men like to see woman withering away because, again, it gives us a perceived physical and emotional dominance. I would like to hear some more about this, because it's so far from how I feel and what I think that it's completely alien to me. But then, I figure you're trolling, so I won't bother.
There's a good amount of truth in TONGO's "addiction" angle. She does look like someone who's got a problem. Now, whether she has or not is a different matter, but she does 'look' like someone who has and, with her history of addiction and the pressure to look a certain way (especially someone of her stature in Hollywood) I wouldn't be surprised at all if she has a spell in hospital with "exhaustion" sometime soon.
However, there's a few key facts which need to be put forward. Firstly, she's 35 years old and, not just any old 35 year old, she's Hollywood 35. That's a lot of aging. Secondly, those 'before' pics were taken when she was 25-30, that's a lot younger. Thirdly, she's had children. Fourthly, a lot of photos taken from the side show just how thin these women actually are. Fifthly being skinny
isn't the same as being unhealthy, it can be an indicator but one doesn't necessarily follow to the other.
Finally, 5 years ago this woman was the sexiest woman in Hollywood, and the same is true today.