Top 10 Biggest Missteps in the James Bond Franchise

Tools    





10 Lazenby quitting

After OHMSS turning him from a car salesman to a B-list actor, he quit. The counterculture was around at the time and his agent told him that violent action films were a thing of the past. If only he had come back for one more, Diamonds Are Forever may have been more sensible of a film.

9 Trying to be politically trendy

The series has had a willingness to jump onto political trends to keep its relevance without examining the purpose. The Man with the Golden Gun made solar energy the villain just in response to OPEC. Come to think of it, numerous villains in the franchise are basically purveyors of new technology.

8 Overeager use of technology

After Goldfinger, bigger budgets were available and a lot of it was dumped on special effects regardless of their necessity. Thunderball's length was inflated by an extra 15-20 minutes due to unprecedented (and dull) underwater action. You Only Live Twice tacked on a battle copter just for the heck of it.

7 Moore staying too long

Despite being late in his career, I contend that Octopussy is a great expression of the man's creativity and humor. A View to a Kill, however, was the point where his old age was very apparent, with actions requiring constant stunt doubles and a co-star less than half his age.

6 Reviving SPECTRE

MGM got the rights from the McClory estate and was eager to use the IP. The plots from the previous Craig movies were all discarded to create a backstory which basically copied Austin Powers. And apart from this, a sequel is implied atop an already shaky foundation.

5 Connery's Comeback(s)

With You Only Live Twice, Connery had 5 strong films under his belt. He came back for Diamonds Are Forever, rather than the film before it, which had a far better script. DAF was is his most lifeless performance and it largely the plots of the preceding films in the trilogy it attempts to finish. To make matters worse, Connery returns to Never Say Never Again, and even with an ample budget and a lot of creative control, it's a nostalgia outing at best.

4 Shelving Dalton

Dalton wasn't exactly marketed correctly as the new Bond. To make matters worse, after his second film, a 6 year lawsuit occurred which prevented any new Bond films from happening and effectively ended his tenure.

3 Misogyny of the 70's

Up until OHMSS, the female characters in the franchise had interesting personalities and some smarts. But, throughout most of the 70's, the female characters became sex objects and talking mistresses. Does every female character need to be "Bond's equal"? Of course not. But at least develop a character more than just casting a hot actress in short skirts and giving her a silly name.

2 Hiring Amateur Directors

This is most apparent in the Brosnan era. While Campbell was a solid choice for Goldeneye, MGM decided to go with lesser known directors (perhaps as a way to cut costs, find more obedient directors, or to launch new careers). However, Spotiswoode made Bond into a typical action movie (Tomorrow Never Dies). Apted had ambitious ideas but lacked in directing ability (The World Is Not Enough). And Tamahori was a plain train wreck (Die Another Day). A Bond director should have at least 1 great film on his/her resume prior.

1 Repeating Plots

Numerous plots in the franchise are very similar. They involve Bond investigating a scene, meeting a woman, fighting a henchman, being kidnapped and raiding an evil lair with some sort of death laser on it. You Only Live Twice, The Spy Who Loved Me and Moonraker repeated the same plot essentially 3 times. In the 70's, particularly, Brocolli felt like the story didn't matter as long as the viewer was having fun. This was during an era when VHS and DVD's didn't exist and films were not as rewatchable.



Moore looked younger in AVTAK than Craig has in the last two films. The film's a much more fitting sendoff too given Octopussy is by far his worst while AVTAK is a classic.
The major missteps count as everything from 1996 onwards. It's become something deeply uninteresting and the 70s movies are infinitely more rewatchable than the Craig era boreathons.



Welcome to the human race...
10 Lazenby quitting
Definitely didn't help matters, though I don't think you can count this as the franchise as a whole making a misstep.

9 Trying to be politically trendy

The series has had a willingness to jump onto political trends to keep its relevance without examining the purpose. The Man with the Golden Gun made solar energy the villain just in response to OPEC. Come to think of it, numerous villains in the franchise are basically purveyors of new technology.
I would think that's an issue with any new tool/resource wherein the problem is that it would be catastrophic if it fell into the wrong hands more so than because of the tool/resource itself. Besides, they're spy movies above all else, and spies' missions are pretty much driven by inherently political conflicts.

8 Overeager use of technology

After Goldfinger, bigger budgets were available and a lot of it was dumped on special effects regardless of their necessity. Thunderball's length was inflated by an extra 15-20 minutes due to unprecedented (and dull) underwater action. You Only Live Twice tacked on a battle copter just for the heck of it.
That's the kind of thing that gave it an edge back in the '60s (which is where your examples come from, so of course they seem dated and unnecessary now), but I'm not so sure it's like that now or even has been for a long time.

7 Moore staying too long

Despite being late in his career, I contend that Octopussy is a great expression of the man's creativity and humor. A View to a Kill, however, was the point where his old age was very apparent, with actions requiring constant stunt doubles and a co-star less than half his age.
Can't argue that, though I could question Octopussy being a good one (would have to revisit, though). For Your Eyes Only is one of his better entries and would've been a good note on which to quit.

6 Reviving SPECTRE

MGM got the rights from the McClory estate and was eager to use the IP. The plots from the previous Craig movies were all discarded to create a backstory which basically copied Austin Powers. And apart from this, a sequel is implied atop an already shaky foundation.
Yeah, that reveal was a bit much and the way they tried to tie in Skyfall was really clumsy, but otherwise it makes sense for Bond to have an arch-nemesis.

5 Connery's Comeback(s)

With You Only Live Twice, Connery had 5 strong films under his belt. He came back for Diamonds Are Forever, rather than the film before it, which had a far better script. DAF was is his most lifeless performance and it largely the plots of the preceding films in the trilogy it attempts to finish. To make matters worse, Connery returns to Never Say Never Again, and even with an ample budget and a lot of creative control, it's a nostalgia outing at best.
I don't count Never Say Never Again since it was never an official EON film - doesn't make it any better or worse, I just see no good reason to care about it whatsoever.

4 Shelving Dalton

Dalton wasn't exactly marketed correctly as the new Bond. To make matters worse, after his second film, a 6 year lawsuit occurred which prevented any new Bond films from happening and effectively ended his tenure.
True - he might well have been my favourite Bond. That being said, it was interesting how Licence to Kill, a film in which Bond quits MI6 to avenge his friend, is followed up by Goldeneye, a film in which Bond sacrifices a friend for his MI6 mission. Maybe it would've been different with Dalton, but if that was what they would've done then it would've been a little inconsistent.

3 Misogyny of the 70's

Up until OHMSS, the female characters in the franchise had interesting personalities and some smarts. But, throughout most of the 70's, the female characters became sex objects and talking mistresses. Does every female character need to be "Bond's equal"? Of course not. But at least develop a character more than just casting a hot actress in short skirts and giving her a silly name.
Eh, the '60s weren't exactly too progressive either - how Pussy Galore gets treated looks especially unfortunate these days.

2 Hiring Amateur Directors

This is most apparent in the Brosnan era. While Campbell was a solid choice for Goldeneye, MGM decided to go with lesser known directors (perhaps as a way to cut costs, find more obedient directors, or to launch new careers). However, Spotiswoode made Bond into a typical action movie (Tomorrow Never Dies). Apted had ambitious ideas but lacked in directing ability (The World Is Not Enough). And Tamahori was a plain train wreck (Die Another Day). A Bond director should have at least 1 great film on his/her resume prior.
Did having a literal Oscar-winner in Sam Mendes do that much for either Skyfall or Spectre? Bond has always been a producer's franchise and even the best directors would have to toe the party line regardless of individual talent.

1 Repeating Plots

Numerous plots in the franchise are very similar. They involve Bond investigating a scene, meeting a woman, fighting a henchman, being kidnapped and raiding an evil lair with some sort of death laser on it. You Only Live Twice, The Spy Who Loved Me and Moonraker repeated the same plot essentially 3 times. In the 70's, particularly, Brocolli felt like the story didn't matter as long as the viewer was having fun. This was during an era when VHS and DVD's didn't exist and films were not as rewatchable.
Yep, that's Bond for you.
__________________
I really just want you all angry and confused the whole time.
Iro's Top 100 Movies v3.0