MovieMeditation's Cinema Reviews

→ in
Tools    






Possibly my last Cinema Review

Whaaat? Why?

Btw, I'm catching up with this thread. It may take a while!
Take a while? Naah, you think so? I'm sure you can catch up before the end of the year. Thanks though, neiba, glad you find my writings interesting - even for their crazy lengths sometimes!

It may be my last Cinema Review, yes. It's unfortunate, but I don't know if I'll be able to do all those press screenings and such anymore, because of a change in my working hours an stuff like that.

But it isn't completely for sure yet, hopefully I'll be able to do some just once in a while...



Dang. Sucks that this may be your last cinema review since you're one of (if not possibly the) best reviewer. Let's hope that's not the case! If it is though, still looking forward to it!!



Dang. Sucks that this may be your last cinema review since you're one of (if not possibly the) best reviewer. Let's hope that's not the case! If it is though, still looking forward to it!!
That's big words, FW, you don't even know what such words mean to me. I can't thank you and everybody else enough for taking your time to read my reviews and writing such heartwarming comments like that. Thank you.

As I said, nothing is 100% certain yet, but if this sudden change does leave me unable to do press screenings, I hope I can still go to the movies once in a while and do these major reviews, though I think I'll change up the formula a little bit.

But yeah, let's see what happens after Sicario. I promise I'll update in here as soon as I know more about the future of this thread. Thanks



Tis a sad day. I'd usually joke at your expense, MM, but I'm very sad to see you stop doing reviews.



The thing isolated becomes incomprehensible
Take a while? Naah, you think so? I'm sure you can catch up before the end of the year. Thanks though, neiba, glad you find my writings interesting - even for their crazy lengths sometimes!

It may be my last Cinema Review, yes. It's unfortunate, but I don't know if I'll be able to do all those press screenings and such anymore, because of a change in my working hours an stuff like that.

But it isn't completely for sure yet, hopefully I'll be able to do some just once in a while...
You know I think you're the best damn reviewer of this forum. I know it might be difficult to put that amount of effort in every review and still deal with real life. That's why I will never leave this basement...

Hope you keep doing them!!



Tis a sad day. I'd usually joke at your expense, MM, but I'm very sad to see you stop doing reviews.
I didn't say I would stop reviewing entirely, only that I'm possibly not going to be able to do reviews for new releases, which is what this thread is mainly for. That goes for the length too, since I won't have the time to do multi paragraphed ones like in here. I'll get back when I know something for sure...



Master of My Domain
Very sad to see a rival reviewer go away. This thread should have been stickied while it was active. Seriously mods ugh



Very sad to see a rival reviewer go away. This thread should have been stickied while it was active. Seriously mods ugh
Wait with the sad farewells till I'm gone for good, Gatsby. I still have a review coming up and I still can't promise you I'll stay out of competition just yet.

The stickied part I agree with though.



— MOVIEMEDITATION PRESENTS —
My Last Cinema Review



SICARIO
______________________________________________

In Spanish Sicario means hitman...
______________________________________________


In Spanish 'Sicario' means hitman. The expression is heavily used in relation to the hitmen associated with the Mexican drug cartels. The man responsible for removing the audience from their soft seats of comfort and bringing them directly into the hard-hitting horror of drug-infused Mexico, is no other than the talented French director, Denis Villeneuve. He is best known for directing the authentic and affective drama, 'Prisoners', as well as the mind-bending and character-betraying thriller, 'Enemy'. His latest film, 'Sicario', is once again a daring and different piece of work that widens the already wonderful talents of this director, while displaying his moviemaking mentality from an even murkier point of view. This is a story inspired by the grim realities of Mexico’s criminal underworld in which we are brought behind the lines of certain death, only to witness the world at its worst. Welcome to hell on earth…

______________________________________________


The Story
The film follows the idealistic FBI agent, Kate Macer, and her unnerving journey deep into the criminal underworld of Juarez, Mexico – a place where rules, routines and recognized formulas are all nonexistent. The only formulas used here are those that end up in measured bags of high value, while the only rules that exist among the Mexican drug cartels are the ones they decide to use as well as to break. With Macer’s demanding duties as a field agent for the FBI, she is often exposed to extreme situations, even though, in reality, she is only scraping the very surface of the frightening realities hidden underneath. What seems to be a typical workday, ends up as a terrifying one instead, when she sees herself in the middle of a grim and grotesque gravesite, almost coming off as a living nightmare. At this point it finally occurs to her how little she knows about her profession and the wide and layered war zone in which she works in. This disgusting mass murder gets the attention of undercover CIA agent and Department of Defense adviser, Matt Graver, who then appears out of nowhere to drag Macer behind the scenes of surfaced sanity and in among the bareboned barbaric slaughterers of the world – all the way out there, where backup and prearranged actions no longer apply. Therefore, Macer is forced to put her ethical and moral values behind her, if she wants to have any hope of cheating death, in an area, where a definitive “death sentence” is already given to you upon arrival. Once you have crossed the border into the violent vandalism of reality, you quickly realize, how the agonizing atmosphere is completely inescapable; the mental images of mutilated corpses are totally erasable; while those who conduct all death and destruction are wholly and utterly unstoppable...


The actual brains behind this criminally well-orchestrated tale of misconduct is a rare group of people, who knows their way around dead bodies and doomed individuals, going straight to the top of bloody good cinema! With this illuminating depiction of the illegal inner circle of Mexico, director, Denis Villeneuve, finally steps forward as a true master of dark and dirty storytelling, showing his captivating capabilities in creating genuine tension with a sense of sublime cinematic craft. This film is not based on true events, yet we are presented with a number of truths that we know exists, though we do not really understand them. It is certainly not the first time that the audience are being dragged all the way across the boundless border between the US and Mexico, where crime is constantly increasing while the population is constantly decreasing. Death and dominating violence occurs on a daily basis and drug lords as well as self-appointed assassins controls the small enclosed community with a tough and tormenting grip. It is this demoralizing sense of doomsday that the film captures impressively well, while almost combining the pre and post-feeling of an apocalypse. The story of 'Sicario' doesn’t exactly reek of originality, but in return it exudes of pure realism and a resounding sense of uncontrolled chaos. This film really understands how to abduct the audience’s mind for about two hour’s time, then place them in a chair inside a dark room where they really feel trapped and held down by the suffocating atmosphere, which tightens up throughout the movie like a clinching rope around the neck. The story is fundamentally screwed together, without any huge surprising turnarounds, but in return, that very story acts as a solid centerpiece, where all the other cinematic elements can be carefully constructed and established around the script. Everything from acting to visual and aural elegance is awarded with a broad and breathable space to operate inside – even if the tension can make you loose your breath at times.

Director, Denis Villeneuve, has taken what seems to be a rather meatless plotline and filled it with blood, sweat and tears, which really creates this brutally honest picture of crime in the Mexican underworld. The film shows Mexico from the worst side possible and brings the audience straight into the heart of this heartless and fragmented society, which has been created purely by and for criminals. The film follows Kate Macer; and we are certainly not the only ones who do. As soon as Macer and the rest of the task force cross the border, they are immediately on guard for enemies waiting in the shadows with loaded weapons and lawless intentions. From there on out it can only go one way, which is up, if we're talking level of excitement, and down, if we refer to our protagonist's journey into the unknown. Just like an assassin – which is also the inspiration behind the title – the story comes creeping and succeeds in maintaining a tense atmosphere all the way towards its target. We know that it is coming, we know that it is happening, but we have no idea when or how; all we can do is step out of the shadows and hope that it is not right here and right now it happens. As an audience, you feel stuck in static anxiety, with a dark cloud of constant fear hanging above your head, stalking your every step wherever you go. Looking at things from the outside it may feel like your typical by the numbers thriller, but apart from a high body count and precisely timed task force operations – which definitely shows that numbers don’t lie – you can’t count on anyone or anything in this film. It isn’t exactly extremely unpredictable, but it feels real and you are convinced as a willing convict to the madness happening on screen.


From the very beginning, it was crystal clear that Kate Macer wondered why she was chosen for this mission and not an agent with more appropriate and relevant experience. However, she soon realizes that neither the still and skillful Matt Graver or the mysterious and macho-manic Alejandro, are going accept her into their own little private inner circle of secrets, unless it becomes absolutely necessary. Macer, who is obviously accustomed to planned and precise missions, achieved as a team build around trust, is suddenly thrown into this hellfire filled with hidden truths and fatal tasks, where she must learn to handle herself and throw every earlier ethic overboard, if she wants to have any chance of surviving this dangerous and demoralizing mission. But because Macer is completely unaware about what goes on behind enemy lines, she is naturally ignorant about all the drastic methods needed to operate on the same level as the cruel criminals of Mexico’s underworld, and why they will have to think differently and more daring to obtain the information necessary. The only method by which one can get close enough to the goal in sight and make a difference, is if you go skip the outer circle and go straight for the powerful midpoint that controls everything. You will need to go directly after the hand that dictates the death rates and directs the country towards a doomed destiny; the hand that has a firm grip on every inhabitant and every illegal immigrant who puts his foot in the wrong place at the wrong time; the hand that has an influence in every crime on every corner and has direct connection to the people on the inside and outside of the law itself... If you remove the most important device to Mexico's constant criminal machinery, the undefeated underworld will fall to the ground like the Devil's private domino bricks. But the question remains whether this decision will change anything after all?

The character of Kate Macer is clearly this rational yet ignorant individual, who finds herself trapped inside the cruel closing hands of a world she doesn’t understand. She lived after specific rules and routines, which in a sense made her job more endurable when various mutilated victims and crammed-in corpses appeared out of nowhere. These images have surely burned itself onto the retina, which is almost even worse, since she stands in a situation where she can’t make sense of things. She has never been presented to what is beyond those houses she kicks doors in on – or to put it more directly, those who is really to blame for her hectic life and those who put all these dead people at her feet. So when she is hired to dive down deep into the chaos of criminality, she finds it difficult to adapt and comprehend what is going on – especially because she as a person and as workforce consists of control and unity, while the world she dives into is build around abandoned and divided anarchy. No one has your back, no one can be trusted and no one can tell you how to separate friends from enemies – the border between the two is a blurred and unclear boundary that can easily be crossed in and out between. She wants to solve everything, but it is hard to accept the fact that the law can’t help her where she stands now. The only thing that helps is to close your eyes to what is right and what is wrong and instead look towards the top of the pile and do what is necessary to reach this peak – and at the same time – your own closing chapter for self-acceptance.



The Acting
Emily Blunt does a good job of showing this woman in conflict with himself and her surroundings. She appears as a mentally strong person, who is also incredibly human and far more fragile than she wants to display for colleagues and those around her. She is dedicated to her work, but also sits firmly in a framework that prevents her from thinking outside the box – especially if this means that she must cross the border between what is right and wrong. Here, Josh Brolin’s character, Matt Graver, comes into the picture, a man who is in a way to blame for Macer march directly into something that she can’t control. He is good at manipulating others and hiding his own weaknesses, which makes him appear like this laid-back type with a trusting tone of voice, who operates silently in the background unless otherwise required – and when he finally did have to participate, he turned out to be surprisingly professional and focused – overall, a person you can’t quite figure out. Brolin plays the character well, but it isn’t far from what we have seen him in countless of times.


The same can be said about the mysterious Alejandro, played by Benicio Del Toro, who often operates in the foreground, but that in turn has its personality in the background – almost like a form of contrasting character to Josh Brolin’s Matt Graver, making the two of them a perfect team-up. It also easy to notice that both of these characters are using work methods, which certainly doesn’t merge with Kate Macer’s morals. This is something that quickly develops into a conflict, which puts the entire mission in danger. But Alejandro conceals a terrible truth, which leads him to act as needed when necessary, which is something Benicio Del Toro shows really well with his acting. As with Brolin, he doesn’t play anything too far out of his comfort zone, but in return, he is perfect for the role of this “human ticking bomb” that you keep distance from but nevertheless would like to study at close range. Across the board the acting remains super solid but without many cracks and crooked ends that could have otherwise driven this film over the edge and into uncertainty. When thinking about the fact that the characters are trapped in borderline insanity, carrying a constant death threat above their heads, ‘Sicario’ plays it surprisingly safe in this area as well. It isn’t as big a complaining point as with the plot, but it is worth highlighting with a red dot, in a movie that otherwise does the darkness of it well enough to blur out everything else.



The Technical Aspect
One of the uppermost advantages of the twelve-time Oscar-nominated cinematographer, Roger Deakins, is the fact he rarely puts on a display or presents his spectacular visual skills as an isolated product that is made to be glanced over inside a small enclosed container. Deakins is a master at adapting to the environment he works in, while making the film function as a complete product, which is to the benefit everything else as well, as these will be beautifully balanced and persistently prepared and fed into the light of a man who wants the film the best. Deakins almost creates an open gap between two worlds with ‘Sicario’, which is so close to reality that we occasionally overlook how brilliant every little puzzle piece actually is. We almost forget how important it is that a film has the correct visual balance if everything from directing to acting are to achieve their full effect. The best example to use here are the perfect night scenes in this movie. Never have I experienced the pitch black evening skies as such a prominent piece of the bigger picture and as a dazzling visual element in the film, yet Deakins dictates both light and darkness like they were a single complete element. That being said, the film also captures the faint but flamboyant sunset, where the shine of the sun is slowly burning out and the danger overtakes the earth and emerges from the darkness. Without Roger Deakins I doubt the film would have been as filthy and foul as the final result turned out to be; a beautifully brutal negative that boosts everything positive about this man and his many talents.



The Soundscape
Almost like Death’s personal sonata the musical tones in ‘Sicario’ comes thundering directly onto the screen and encloses the entire scenario with its own subjective sense of chaotic law and order. The music in 'Sicario' is ultra dominating and soul devouring in its attendance, but at the same time allows enough room for the deafening silence, which is created solely and utterly by personal visual empathy. The film would do just fine without the soundtrack, yet it is the feeling of a menacing march from beyond, through streets and alleyways, which just gives the film that extra push out towards the cinema seats and across the border between reality and fiction. The decisive underlying discomfort in the musical compositions is what makes the film feel more alive to its audience, completing the atmospheric circle of which the director tried to mold together from the very beginning. It's dark, dank, depressing and damn effective. The Day of the Dead, coming from the Mexican culture, has suddenly become a frightening reality, where all sorts of troubled souls come marching through the town to avenge their death and tell the world about the underworld – here, not indicating the world of the dead, but the criminal and chaotic underworld, which is being portrayed so effectively in 'Sicario'.


______________________________________________

SHORT SUMMARY // 'Sicario' cuts all the way into the bone with its dead-honest portrayal of a criminal and cracked country completely out of control. The plot is not deeply original or truly surprising, but in return it doesn’t take long for you to feel held down by the dirty and unpleasant ambiance, which slowly tightens its grip on your subconscious until the suffocating sensation of the atmosphere has settled heavily onto your entire body. The visual presentation of the criminal underworld feels just as fresh as those corpses hanging around on the streets as macabre manifests for the criminal domination; but at the same time the atmosphere feels exactly as suffocating and rotten as those bodies buried underneath the ground or laying cemented behind the walls. The film is really a penetrating piece of an uphill struggle, which just oozes with technical professionalism, creating a good foundation for the other elements of the film. 'Sicario' is simply a cut above other films of the genre, created with technical elegance of the finest kind and with a persistent point of view on perfectionism, which pierces your cinematic heart like the sharpest of knives – an accomplishment only meant as a positive. I do wish the plot had been tighter and the stakes had been higher, but as a “thrill-to-kill” ride through your worst nightmares this is a guaranteed hit, man, no doubt about it.


FINAL RATING //


______________________________________________
We have come to an end, my fellow mofos. I hope you have enjoyed this and all that came before. I hope to return to major reviews again in the future, but as of now, this may very well be my last one in this thread. I have enjoyed delivering these novel-length write-ups to you and I hope I may be able to do some short ones once in a while in my diary thread or maybe in a new thread entirely. Thank you for your support.



I have to return some videotapes.
Glad you liked it! I was really impressed by Benicio, and a lot of people are calling an Oscar nomination for him. Do you think so? It seemed like you thought he was pretty good, but not really amazing.



Glad you liked it! I was really impressed by Benicio, and a lot of people are calling an Oscar nomination for him. Do you think so? It seemed like you thought he was pretty good, but not really amazing.
It was definitely one of his best peformances and overall it may be the best performance of the movie.

He could get a nomination but I'm not sure. I wouldn't mind if he did though.



How similar to Traffic do you think this is?
Despite being on my watchlist for years and years, I still haven't watched that movie. Shame on me. So I'm sorry, but I won't be able to answer that until I see Traffic...



Movie Review: Boyhood (2014)


Capture the moment...

Director Richard Linklater has managed to keep his patience-level extraordinarily low during more than 12 years of complicated and dedicated film production. By using tremendous patience and above all a targeted vision Linklater has composed a drama, which in remarkable manner surpasses former ultra-ambitious projects from his respected filmography; films such as the beloved ‘Before’ trilogy, the far-from-lazy 'Slacker' and the crazy unique mind-trip 'Waking Life'.

All of Linklater’s films are often an impressive medley of thoughtful discussions, authentic life images and unpolished moments of the world we live in. The film 'Boyhood' is certainly no exception, and it almost seems as if these elements are allowed to play out even more freely and naturally than previously seen. ‘Boyhood’ is an absolute dream project for someone like Richard Linklater.



The Story
The film follows the six-year-old boy Mason (Ellar Coltrane) and his rough upbringing from a messy childhood to independent adulthood, a period that extends across twelve years. Along the way, life itself vicissitudes drastically around him with several father figures, and a biological father (Ethan Hawke), who’s never really been a consistent part of Mason’s and his sister's life. But as Mason grows up he develops a certain control of the old problems, establishes new acquaintances, and above all, forms his very own life experiences. All this takes place by means of periodic moments in Masons life, which helps the audience to understand his journey and understand his personality. 'Boyhood' is a magnanimous life journey on film, but is it equally successful in its execution as it is impressive in its engineering?


There is absolutely no doubt that expectations around this expansive and daring film project was soaring even before the premiere of the film. Due to the slightly unusual approach where the story of the film is told in real-time in a period over 12 years, it is not difficult to imagine the curiosity arising solely out of this element. Therefore it’s not really a necessity to be a solidarity fan of Richard Linklater or of the dramaturgical genre to feel just a little little bit interested. Surprisingly enough, all this overwhelming publicity and the relevant unfulfilled expectations unfortunately suffered as a barricade for the overall success of the film with the mainstream audience. People will understandably be curious about what might be hiding behind this immensely positive reception that ‘Boyhood’ has received from critics all around the globe, and of course, if the film will answer the big mysterious question of the day: was 12 long years really that necessary?

Despite all these expectations and the film's sky high level of ambition it's basically a perplexingly small and intimate film, with a story that is quite far from what the publicity might seem to tell you. 'Boyhood' is not an attempt to be a tension filled and intense drama about a boy's complicated upbringing, but rather a film that tries to capture life's realistic and most precious moments all the way from child to adult. The film is about moments in life, not necessarily periods, and there are no annoying writings that pop up on the cinema screen along the way, to provide information about where we are in time – because that is completely irrelevant – as an audience we should feel the moments, not be informed about them. This film is consequently not just simple pretentious and pitiful nonsense with "style over substance", even though some might be tempted to believe just that. The style here is to strengthen the substance of the story, not overshadow it.

For a film with such a youthful title as 'Boyhood' it’s a surprisingly mature expansion of Richard Linklater's wide talents in story telling, which appear smarter and more sophisticated here, respectively, than in previous works – a great and astonishing pleasure to attend! The film is even maintained on a natural and comfortable level throughout, and despite the 165 minutes of playing time, the film is never boring since there’s always a constant evolution in time, with the characters, and in the outside world. And because of that it’s not an obligation to have been a boy to be able to relate or enjoy the film's undeniable qualities. The focus of the film is as much on what happens around Mason, such as the evolving technology, culture and politics.


The film's true midpoint in all this is, however, still the main character’s life and upbringing and there are both dark and light periods to discover in Mason's life. Usually it’s the actual story of a film that provides the thread of coherence from start to finish, but in this case it is a person, in which ‘Boyhood’ succeeds exceedingly well. One can say that there are a few well-known clichés to find; such as the father who comes and goes, the mother undergoing numerous divorces and relationships, and bullying by school pupils as well as by the strenuous siblings at home. But then one might also conclude that all this has become clichés for a reason? It's something a wider audience will understand and relate to themselves, and counting 12 years of dealing with adolescence and adulthood boiled down to a running time of 165 “short” minutes, we can assume that it’s hardly unknown and incomprehensible situations we wish to be portrayed in this film?

So please do overwhelm us with the honest childhood and what we remember most from the time period of the film. Fill us with the wizarding literature recitation in the pleasing company of Harry Potter, the old nostalgic video games and consoles, earlier versions of well-known computer brands and other gadgets and the joy of the time when technology wasn’t as dominant – and that's exactly what director Richard Linklater does so astoundingly well. 'Boyhood' is a film consisting of periods, experiences, moments, life, development, maturity, and more. If only one is engaged enough then you will also become interested enough in the character's life as time passes by. You feel with them, and you understand them. Linklater almost has the power to make his audience feel like some sort of a passive parent, who sit securely and a tad restless in the cinema seats, while their cinematic adoptive son is being sent out into the big world... And it has to be said, that is something that requires great humanistic understanding and especially great talent.



The Acting
Back in 2002 when Linklater launched his major life project there was a need for a bit more than just his own faithful dedication. He needed people, both in front of and behind the camera, to go with him on this long journey. A functioning film crew with technical standards is a necessity but what if one chooses to leave the project? Yes, then that person can easily be replaced by someone else without any major problems. This, in turn, is virtually impossible with the main characters in the film. They simply need to be one-hundred percent dedicated to the project's 12-year duration if the end result is to function.


So it was quite a task when fetching actors to the project – especially for the role of the boy Mason. And when the full cast finally was found you could only hope that nobody turned around and left mid-way during the production. Especially the youngest actors must have been a challenge since you would have to gamble heavily on the fact that they wouldn’t grow up and become terrible actors. But Linklater has thankfully had the right amount of professionalism and luck to actually end up with a project that just shines so beautifully when finally witnessed in its finished form.

All the acting performances are very aesthetic and realistic across the board and especially Ethan Hawke does a sublime job in the role of Mason's biological father. In between, some of the children achievements seem a bit debatable and the level of standard can change from scene to scene, though it is often satisfactory. Richard Linklater's own daughter, Lorelei, may not be the next big female breakthrough in the film industry, but this specific selection did make the burden a little lighter and the process more straightforward for the hard-working director.


The Technical Aspect
Certainly one of the most fundamental elements of a film of this calibre is based on the visual and editing aspect. It is important to have a natural approach to every scene, and the camera must be present in the film but without being a distracting factor. Furthermore the technical aspect mustn’t feel like a pointless provision of moments but as a part of them. The atmosphere must be caught when it’s there and not least in the right way.

With 'Boyhood' all these mentioned factors are certainly not absent. There has clearly been thought about every single element throughout, especially in regard to the editing which liquidly moves its focus from one periodic milestone to another. The transitions are a mixture of perfect image composition and editing, which contribute to the natural shift from past to future. As an audience you’re quickly and easily becoming immersed into the story and you’ll rarely notice the longstanding gaps that occur between scenes.


Life periods in the film rarely feel forced or misplaced but just as forthright and authentic as is the case in real life. Richard Linklater has said that the film somehow acts as a "time-lapse photography of a human being" which describes the film and its purpose extremely precise. A worthy presentation of the film and its technology will be virtually impossible, and I would argue that the following quote from the film describes it in the best possible way: "Any dipshit can take pictures. But it takes a real genius to make art."



The Soundscape
Just as with the visual side of the film the soundscape is just as beautiful and charismatically rounded every time we come to a different moment in Mason’s life and is yet again in the need of creating a new and appropriate atmosphere. The music is certainly not constantly present in the film but the timing is carefully chosen and tones are never pushed involuntarily into frame. But when the music is finally there it’s in a way that ensures a full atmospheric blast and provides for the complete ambiance of the film.

There’re also some scenes with on-screen music, which are there to lift and further confirm the natural approach taken to this particular story. Especially because Mason's father is a little musically involved himself, and because of that it works great, and it's a smart way to ensure plenty of rhythmic tones in the film without it ever appearing as a false method to seduce the audience. That’s another well-deserved thumbs-up for Richard Linklater and his phenomenal 'Boyhood'!



SHORT SUMMARY Richard Linklater has planted twelve fruitful trees and let them take root in life’s most treasured moments. He has maintained his focus throughout the process and ultimately once again proves his worth as an innovative master of the art of film. If even possible, this is the director's largest and most far-ranging project yet, and quite possible his most intimate and complete film to date. A masterpiece that is completely its own and which I hope will be seen and loved again 12 years from now. A film about the passage of time deserves to be taken up again as time passes by, and 'Boyhood' is certainly no exception...



overall rating:
Excellent movie, well-written, really made me want to see the movie. Patricia Arquette's Oscar-winning performance not withstanding.



Movie Review: Mr. Turner (2014)


"Who in the world is Joseph Mallord William Turner? An artist you say? Well why not just make a film about Pablo Picasso or Leonardo De Vinci?"

The point is in fact, that the British Mr. Turner was an exceptional and gifted artist, who unfortunately took an unnecessary stream of negativity and despair upon himself, in connection to his controversial and unconventional methods and works. Since then, he has achieved the noble respect of which he deserves, especially as a historical milestone in the form of "the painter who elevated the art of reproducing landscapes".

Director Mike Leigh has in relation to this pictured his own dedication needed for a project of this relatively large calibre; a truly unique chance to study and examine the artist Mr. Turner as the mortal and flawed human being that he was, whom in contrast, was also able to create epic and spiritual works of art that seamlessly distilled the world that we live in.



The Story
The film is about the British painter J.M.W. Turner (Timothy Spall) and the last 25 years of his life as the villain and hero, respectively, of the great but uneven “heavenly space” of the world of art and expression. We follow Mr. Turner through brush strokes and brush strikes, all the while he travels through his motherland's most beautiful and inspiring areas – trips, that not only stimulates his artistic side but also his humanistic. His heart definitely beats for art, but along the way Mr. Turner stumbles upon other qualities, which likewise speaks to the ardent artist's heart. But if it so happens that the stubborn artist stumbles upon the true love of his life, it is far more important to him, if the British people ever truthfully express the love they have for him. But is Mr. Turner indeed a fantastic artist or an artistic fraud?

With 'Mr. Turner’ Mike Leigh leads his audience deep into the portrait of a misunderstood and controversial artist who must fight persistently to attain recognition for his qualities as a painter and as a person. But it is far from an easy goal to accomplish, for behind the artist’s distinguishable dull mannerisms and short-of-word responses lies a great deal of well-hidden feelings, which crave deeply for the proper guidance. Occasionally we get to see these darker sides, which results in a constant character development that never fails to take surprising and interesting twists and turns throughout. For although the shapes and shades in the foreground of a painting are definitely a joy to behold, it is more about the hidden personal and defective characteristics further beyond, which boosts the painting up to a considerable higher level – and that is exactly the case with this focus of this film.


This film is very much an imperfect cutwork of the man behind the brush, carefully placed in the 1800s British beauties of the landscapes. The story of the film is not constructed by using the classic storytelling templates, with carefully selected and shortened periodic clips from the largest and most important highlights of Mr. Turner's life. Instead, the audience will feel a more natural and slightly unsystematic approach to the story, of which the essence of the biographical narrative casts its focus on capturing the atmospheric force of which said periodic life images have the ability to deliver. It doesn’t always work, but it creates an interesting focus for the film in which Mr. Turner dominates and therefore controls the core of this very story. The narrative is maintained further by the dialogic period-mix of the film, consisting of old expressions and new initiatives, and together it provides a playful and nuanced balance to 'Mr. Turner ' as a whole.

Honestly, it is not really important to find out if he ever wins the British people over, or if the film ever takes a tragic dramatic turnaround to create fast-and-forced compassion. We follow Mr. Turner, as the man he just happened to be, and along the way we create our very own thoughts and ideas. Will he ever sort out all of his family problems, will the endless evolution of art ever pass him by, and is he truly an astoundingly pathetic or graceful person? The only answer to this is to fall comfortably down in the cinema seats so you can experience and reflect on Mr. Turner as a person, as a painter, and as a product of cinema.



The Acting
If I by any chance left you behind in a slightly brooding condition in the previous paragraph, in connection to the fact that the story of the film actually works reasonably well, without neither being linear or straightforward in its approach, then the following statement is one of the main reasons why. 'Mr. Turner’ is first and foremost a magnificent actors assembly, not necessarily consisting of the highest ranked names of the so-called ‘A-list’, but rather performances of which could definitely be looked upon as worthy of that category. Everybody provide the film with the very best they have learned, no matter if that means acting out performances of comprehensive or understated fundamentals and gesticulations; and it is really hard to point a crooked finger towards the "sinner" of this film, as there honestly isn’t one.


First off, let's get the following out the way; Timothy Spall’s sophisticated “tour de force” of a masterful performance, playing the role of Mr. Turner, is a career-high landmark for the actor. A man full of insufficient words and suppressed emotions, where even a little rumbling and mumbling can accommodate the same expanded diversity as a thesaurus. Spall assigns his character with a sincerely unique angle of which is neither square, rectangular, or in any shape or form within the semi-traditional outer edges of acting. It’s the highly sought-after “golden section” of acting, where the limited amount of space between over- and underplaying a character creates the perfect workstation for an actor of this capability. Timothy Spall was born to play the role of Mr. Turner.

Although the focus point lies in the hands of the title character, all of the surrounding performances are, to say the least, just as important and works just as well. Marion Bailey as Mrs. Booth serves as a wonderful companion throughout the film, especially because of the fact that she simply oozes with life and a heart-warming personality, no matter if the world treats her well or poor. Joshua McGuire gives a surprisingly controlled performance, in which a character of unbearable and slimy modality, can be safely placed in the category "charming and annoying" – a category involving two words rarely present in the same sentence but all the same still unite effortlessly under the impressive supervision and control of McGuire.



The Technical Aspect
'Mr. Turner' feels exactly like a living painting from start to finish. A visual wonder, in which the modern digitization of film puts its focus on a more classical narrative and comes out the other side as a pure success. Director and cinematographer have mutually decided, that the benefits of digital film production possess the needed capacities of grasping the life and colours of the film, and practically lift them off of the silver screen. Every scene is like a painting, in a quite literal sense, in which the director utilizes windows and doorways throughout ‘Mr. Turner’, to give the audience the feeling of looking directly through framed works of art – and it works tremendously!


A picture is worth a thousand words; this film is shot at 24 frames per second; and consists of a duration of approximately 150 minutes – in that case, we are left with more than 9,000 individual illustrations, fluently strung together, which in the end has created this year's perhaps most beautiful film. So if the film itself isn’t your preferred cup of tea, then you can always lean back in the comfortable seats and experience the immersive and stunning colourful images by themselves – they are truly worth it.



The Soundscape
The soundtrack doesn’t come off as lively and broad as the visuals, but in turn it is the simplicity that triumphs this time around. The talented composer of the film, Gary Yershon, has taken a step towards much bolder decisions with the musical tones of ‘Mr. Turner’, and has purposefully chosen not to march toward neither the happy nor tragic. Instead, he has played around with the idea of a simpler soundtrack, used to set the atmospheric and moody undertones that have the ability to illustrate all of the many tonal shifts in the film. The music is almost like a pending tone of mystery, which alludes to both the peaceful as well as the prodigal. Personally I was still missing some kind of variation, but one must nevertheless bow down to the courageous and successful execution, of something that might as well have been a thick and noticeable brushstroke too much…



SHORT SUMMARY Mike Leigh has drawn a rough portrait of a true and truly misunderstood artist; and with the "roughness" follows great pleasures, but the structure and length is arguably not one of them. Had the story been a tad more focused and the duration around half an hour shorter, we would still have gotten beautiful images, great performances, and a satisfying and respectful film about J.M.W. Turner. That said you should not miss out on the experience, as this marvellous work of art in itself is only just one gob of spit away from being perfect.


overall rating:
+
Another great review...Timothy Spall is always worth watching.



That's cool. I didn't like it... So enjoy!

I do think I'll like Sicario, though.
I was disappointed in Traffic but am also looking forward to Sicario.

Keep it up MovieMed! I didn't read the review since I hope to see the movie soon, but happy to see the result.



When the thread implies "dead or alive",

the most of us just believe it is dead and move along with our lives.

But when MovieMeditation says it ain't so...

It ain't so.

SO THE PEOPLE WANNA KNOW...



AND I CAN ONLY SAY...

YES INDEED. YOU'RE GONNA GET A REVIEW.

NOT A QUESTION, NOT AN ANSWER...

A REVIEW.


review of THE HATEFUL EIGHT coming soon...