Rate The Last Movie You Saw

Tools    





DUNE: PART TWO
(2024, Villeneuve)



Paul Atreides: "If I go south, all my visions lead to horror. Millions of people dead because of me."
Gurney Halleck: "Because you lose control?"
Paul Atreides: "Because I gain it."

Dune: Part Two continues the journey of Paul Atreides (Timothée Chalamet) as he joins the native Fremen of Arrakis to fight against his enemies from House Harkonnen. Paul continues to be haunted by visions and dreams; the same that warned him not to try to stop the process of life, but to "flow" with it now warns him of horrors if he gains control. But again, we can't stop the process.

I saw this a day after watching the first one, as part of my journey to catch up on as many Best Picture nominees as I could. Even though I enjoyed the first one, I found this one to be better. Maybe it's the thrill of the climax, or maybe it's the fact that it brings closure to most of the plotlines that were set up in the first one. Whatever the reason, I found myself glued to the TV during the last act and I loved the places the story went to.

Grade:



Full review on my Movie Loot
__________________
Check out my podcast: The Movie Loot!





The Death of Mr. Lazarescu, 2005

Mr. Lazarescu (Ion Fiscuteanu) is an elderly man living alone who one night begins to experience a headache and stomach pains. Eventually calling an ambulance, he is shuttled from hospital to hospital by EMT Mioara (Luminita Gheorghiu). Through the night, various doctors dismiss the pair and push them on to different hospitals and Lazarescu’s condition deteriorates.

This is a harrowing watch---though not without moments of humor!--that effectively makes its point about how people are allowed to fall through the cracks and the absolute injustice that those who are socially isolated can be denied a good death.



FULL REVIEW



The Guy Who Sees Movies
To me, it seems like a carefree, senseless movie but lots of fun.

I plan on watching it. Maybe this Tuesday.
I'd go with the carefree and senseless, but lots of fun? I was too busy rolling my eyes and looking for bloopers.



антигероиня
I'd go with the carefree and senseless, but lots of fun? I was too busy rolling my eyes and looking for bloopers.
I did see it tonight and i enjoyed the hell out of it.

It reminded me a bit like Upgrade (2018), which is a favorite of mine.

There were cringe worthy gore moments.
__________________
Its tougher to be vulnerable than to actually be tough.

90's Redux Seen: 18/34
My List 2/25
#12 The Crow
One Pointer: The Polar Bear King



I forgot the opening line.

By http://www.impawards.com/2025/mickey...ver2_xxlg.html, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=78090284

Mickey 17 - (2025)

Mickey Barnes (Robert Pattinson) joins up for an interplanetary colonization mission in the year 2054 because he's on the run from loan sharks with friend Timo (Steven Yeun), and since he has no qualifications he signs up for the worst job there is on the mission - as an "expendable". Expendables are the crew members sent out to meet certain death - safe in the knowledge that their memories will be reimplanted into a printed out replica body after they die. When the 17th iteration of Mickey makes it back to home base after being left for dead, he comes face to face with Mickey 18, and has to deal with what has become one of humanity's most wicked taboos - being a "Multiple". I thought there were a lot of interesting places this Bong Joon Ho sci-fi comedy could go (see Moon, or Infinity Pool), but instead it all felt rather prosaic and lacking in imagination. I did appreciate the inclusion of a Donald Trump proxy - Kenneth Marshall is a narcissistic, egomaniacal ex-politician who has a cult-like following who don red baseball caps - he's played by Mark Ruffalo, who seems to be exploring pompous, camp characters these days.

Throughout the film people keep asking Mickey what it's like to die - moments that are usually set up as being insensitive and uncaring. The fact that Mickey is an expendable seems to naturally preclude his fellow crew members really caring about him at all (Marshall and the expeditions scientists like to use him as a human guinea pig). I thought the fact that this was a person who had died multiple times might be explored in some seriously thoughtful manner, but the plot also involves alien creatures on the planet the crew are colonizing and it's not long before the more visceral parts of the narrative take over. I was a little disappointed with the production design, with the snow-bound, rock-strewn planet resembling Earth and the aliens having a rather mediocre design. The final act really lacked surprise - but I guess even the greatest of filmmakers can't be struck with divine inspiration all of the time. For me, if Bong Joon Ho makes a basically "average" movie then that's a bit of a let-down - but perhaps Mickey 17 will grow on me over time. That is, if I decide to watch it again. (Oh, and the year should be 2154 - no way will we be in the midst of colonizing distant planets with technology like that 29 years from now.)

6/10


By Heritage Auctions, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1607959

High Sierra - (1941)

Bogart had to see off rivals such as Paul Muni and George Raft in order to star in this, his biggest star-making movie to that date - and even then Ida Lupino nabbed first-billing from him at the last minute after her previous film, They Drive by Night, became a big hit. What High Sierra is though is a film which revolves around the character of past-it gangster Roy Earle, who Bogart was born to play. Earle is let out of prison, pardoned, and ordered to pull off one more heist - but the tough guy finds himself softening. He falls for a young girl and pays for her operation to cure her clubfoot, adopts a dog and befriends Marie Garson (Ida Lupino) - the world has changed since he last saw it, and so has he. All the same, his destiny beckons when one thing after another related to the heist goes wrong and Earle must rely on his wits to keep ahead of the law. It reads like the end of an era - the classical age of the gangster, and shows off Bogart's talents to such a degree that it's worth seeing the film just to watch the great actor ply his trade.

7/10


By IMDB - https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7670212/, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=59698001

The Golden Glove - (2019)

Most everything in The Golden Glove gives you cause to blanch, reminding you of how seedy an underbelly there is out there in the dark recesses of low-rent bars and pornography-clad bachelor dens. Steel yourself, if you intend to take it all in. Full review here, in my watchlist thread.

7/10
__________________
Remember - everything has an ending except hope, and sausages - they have two.

Latest Review : Before the Rain (1994)



💔🕊️Rip Michelle Trachtenberg🕊️💔
been rewatching michelle trachtenberg movies cause i really miss her and shes my childhood favorite actress since i was little , loved katee sackhoff also loved her bad attitude lol and seth green did a good job loved him on buffy the vampire slayer






Finch - (2021)

6/10
__________________
You don't remember me? We spoke on the phone two days ago. I told you I would find you.

(MILLS, 2008)



I'm pretty close to agreement with you except that I thought her letting them off easy after just scaring the shit out of them keeps the movie grounded, her sanity still in check, and her still relatable. I think if the movie goes to a darker place with that aspect she becomes a bit too obvious and unsympathetic and then the rest doesn't work as well.
Thats a good point as far as keeping it grounded. My feeling after this rewatch though was that the ploys she was doing had little to no impact (until the very end).

WARNING: spoilers below

1. The very first guy tells his friends about the night she tricked him, yet one of his friends still tries taking her home later in the movie.
2. The doctor she is dating has little remorse after seeing the video of himself from years earlier, immediately verbally attacking her.
3. The groom at the end shows little remorse while handcuffed to the bed and eventually killing her (a second victim of his now).


Maybe the intent was to make her seem a bit naive, but her notebook having countless encounters of guys like this makes me think she was kind of wasting her time and life away...which her parents and others try to communicate to her in other ways.




cute bordering on gross like most of Jared Masters' stuff but there's some really weird and silly little details that elevate it to one of his better works and the soundtrack is killer whether its them just picking some good punk songs or the couple of scrungly-ass tracks they made themselves.
__________________
slurps up! 🤙🤙



Victim of The Night
Thats a good point as far as keeping it grounded. My feeling after this rewatch though was that the ploys she was doing had little to no impact (until the very end).

WARNING: spoilers below

1. The very first guy tells his friends about the night she tricked him, yet one of his friends still tries taking her home later in the movie.
2. The doctor she is dating has little remorse after seeing the video of himself from years earlier, immediately verbally attacking her.
3. The groom at the end shows little remorse while handcuffed to the bed and eventually killing her (a second victim of his now).


Maybe the intent was to make her seem a bit naive, but her notebook having countless encounters of guys like this makes me think she was kind of wasting her time and life away...which her parents and others try to communicate to her in other ways.
But I thought that was the whole point was that she was just wasting her life out of grief for her friend. It's just sad and futile and she is totally wasting her life which is why Dad Clancy Brown is so sad. It's really a sad and poignant movie until it decides to take it to that next level. And I mean, she almost breaks out of it, almost. Of course, you could tell a mile away that
WARNING: "pretty spoilery" spoilers below
the boyfriend thing was going to happen that way, but still, it plays. The movie is really not about a serial-killer woman or a potential serial-killer woman it's about this woman tragically throwing her life away in no small part because our society allows things like this to happen.



SEPTEMBER 5
(2024, Fehlbaum)



"Our job is really straightforward. We put the camera in the right place, and we follow the story as it unfolds in real time. News can tell us what it all meant after it's over. And I'm sure they're gonna try. But this is our story. And we're keeping it."

On September 5, 1972, during the Summer Olympics, a Palestinian terrorist group called Black September infiltrated the Olympic village and took the Israeli Olympic team hostage. This film follows the ABC Sports crew that found themselves in the middle of it all, and ended up covering the events by putting the camera in the right place, and following the story as it unfolded.

September 5 Best Original Screenplay nomination might have been the main reason why I checked it out. However, the real life events are notorious and have been successfully dramatized before in Munich so I knew it would be a compelling watch. It is one of those films where you already know the outcome, so I commend director Tim Fehlbaum and his writers for managing to still deliver the tension.

Grade:



Full review on my Movie Loot



KUNG POW! ENTER THE FIST
(2002, Oedekerk)



Master Tang: "I remember a long time ago, when a friend told me there would be a chosen one."
[flashback to a younger Tang talking to Master Doe]
Master Doe: "There will be a chosen one."

For the sake of this written review, I'll try to summarize its plot. Kung Pow! Enter the Fist follows "The Chosen One" (Steve Oedekerk) as he tries to master his powers while seeking revenge against the killer of his parents, Master Betty. What sets it apart is the fact that Oedekerk (who also wrote, produced, and directed the film) takes the footage of a 1970s martial arts film and digitally inserts himself as a character, while also humorously dubbing all the voices.

I suppose that the effectiveness of the film will depend on everyone's latitude with it, but I believe that if you're able to get on its wavelength, you will have a hell of a time with it. It goes beyond the silliness of Oedekerk's dubbing, but also the way that he manages to mold and shape this existing story to fit his comedic goals is hilariously impressive. Ironically, the moments that were filmed originally for the film – most notably, the cow fight and the meeting with Whoa – are probably the least effective.

Grade:



Full review on my Movie Loot



Don’t Bother to Knock (1952)
[Could not load poster: "Internal server error"]

I hadn’t seen this picture in years, so while re-watching it last night I was stunned to realize what a first rate dramatic performance Marilyn Monroe gave. Obvious from the film’s poster, in her previous 15 films she had already been gradually typecast as a sexpot, so the reviewers of this film at that time tended to be biased, and most of them characterized Monroe’s role as simply her attempt to be taken seriously as an actress. However, looking back without the clouded lens of 1952, Monroe’s portrayal of the mentally disturbed Nell Forbes is one of her finest dramatic performances-- one that is emotionally deep, straightforward, and believable.

Arranged by her uncle, who is an elevator operator in a NYC hotel, a young woman is pressed into service as a babysitter for a child whose parents are staying at the hotel where they will be attending an awards ceremony. At the same time an airline pilot is staying at the hotel, and is attempting to resuscitate a relationship with a chanteuse who performs at the hotel’s lounge. The babysitter gradually slips into a fantasy world while becoming infatuated with the pilot. The story plays out from there to a gratifying ending.

And what a cast. Richard Widmark is the male lead, Elijah Cook, Jr. lends noir bona fides, and Anne Bancroft is impressive in her film debut. The daughter is played by familiar child actress Donna Corcoran. Jim Backus and Lurene Tuttle have recognizable roles as the parents. Director Roy Ward Baker manages to unfold an interesting story with a very small budget and confined sets.

A solid “A” picture, it has a “B” film length of only 76 minutes. Despite its low budget, 20th Century Fox birthed a surprisingly strong movie that still holds up today. Available here: https://archive.org/details/dont-bother-to-knock-1952

Doc’s rating: 7/10






Set in 1845 on the eve of Ireland's devastating potato famine, Tomás Ó Súilleabháin's dark and brooding historical drama/thriller pulls no punches as it charts one man's struggle to survive both starvation and betrayal.


Dónall Ó Héalaí stars as Còlman Sharkey, a peasant farmer/fisherman/family man who, after taking in an ex-sailor and fellow countryman, soon finds himself on the run for a murder he didn't commit, struggling both to fend off starvation and preserve his sanity.


A beautifully filmed tragedy that isn't easy to watch at times, and could stand a bit more clarity during the second half. Still, the film as a whole ultimately succeeds in bringing one of Ireland's most turbulent periods to vivid, unflinching life through the lens of one man's personal fight for survival and redemption.





DUNE: PART TWO
(2024, Villeneuve)





Dune: Part Two continues the journey of Paul Atreides (Timothée Chalamet) as he joins the native Fremen of Arrakis to fight against his enemies from House Harkonnen. Paul continues to be haunted by visions and dreams; the same that warned him not to try to stop the process of life, but to "flow" with it now warns him of horrors if he gains control. But again, we can't stop the process.

I saw this a day after watching the first one, as part of my journey to catch up on as many Best Picture nominees as I could. Even though I enjoyed the first one, I found this one to be better. Maybe it's the thrill of the climax, or maybe it's the fact that it brings closure to most of the plotlines that were set up in the first one. Whatever the reason, I found myself glued to the TV during the last act and I loved the places the story went to.

Grade:



Full review on my Movie Loot
I watched part of it on the small screen first, and I shrugged. Then I went and saw it in the theater and I was floored. When they say "meant to be seen on the big screen" they're talking about this.






Set in 1845 on the eve of Ireland's devastating potato famine, Tomás Ó Súilleabháin's dark and brooding historical drama/thriller pulls no punches as it charts one man's struggle to survive both starvation and betrayal.


Dónall Ó Héalaí stars as Còlman Sharkey, a peasant farmer/fisherman/family man who, after taking in an ex-sailor and fellow countryman, soon finds himself on the run for a murder he didn't commit, struggling both to fend off starvation and preserve his sanity.


A beautifully filmed tragedy that isn't easy to watch at times, and could stand a bit more clarity during the second half. Still, the film as a whole ultimately succeeds in bringing one of Ireland's most turbulent periods to vivid, unflinching life through the lens of one man's personal fight for survival and redemption.


Wonder why I can’t find it in Letterboxd.
__________________
I’m here only on Mondays, Wednesdays & Fridays. That’s why I’m here now.