I'm just using examples the Clinton campaign used all over their advertisements. I didn't take the p*ssy video literally. He tried to sleep with a married woman, ethically not right but not misogynistic. If there's evidence he actually does grope woman, than I could make an argument that he does not respect them absolutely.
Well I did take it more literally than you then, the fact that the tape doesn't seem to be much of an isolated incident, and there's a number of women who say he sexually insulted them, would be a big coincidence if everything was false. I think there's clear evidence of consistently misogynistic behaviour where he sees women as objects that is free to have control over.
But then Bill Clinton and Weiner are both sexists, by the same definition.
Don't know much about Weiner, but Bill Clinton might be, yes. When did I ever say he wasn't? How does the change the argument in any way.
But either wise it's just locker room talk.
Don't know what locker rooms you go in, if you think this language is acceptable even in a friendly environment.
He has objectified women in the past, but we all have.
Have we? And even so, these are just isolated incidents, it's again and again, and claims of sexual assault and mistreatment are everywhere.
As woman objectify men. If it's a girl saying I'll run up and grab him by his bulge, I wouldn't find that sexist either. If you do, you have a loser definition than I do.
Maybe some do. And yes, I would probably say that is sexism. Maybe I do have a "looser definition", but I would prefer to call it more respect for fellow human beings and their bodies.
As far as the c*nt comment, I know in the UK and Aussie it's used for both genders, maybe even more for your lads. But in the US it's generally used as a derogatory word for a woman. I'm not even arguing that its sexist to say, but it's much closer than what Trump has said
Yeah it's used for both genders over here, but it does have a female undertone, and it's not a word that I like to use or think should be used, but I would need to have more context and know more about the person who uses it to judge whether they're misogynistic overall. But even if Maher is, it doesn't make any difference to the argument I'm making that Trump is.
You're the one dragging race into it. Nothing about voter fraud, has any racial implication. Atleast I didn't think so, might say more about your sub conscious opinions.
I can't remember exactly, but at least in the way he talked, the language that he used to refer to groups of people seemed to indicate that he was targetting minorities in certain areas. Maybe he doesn't say it out right, but yes, I do think it was implied.
Sure it could've. But liberals mindlessly calling him and his supporters racists (Hillary Clintons word- half of them are deplorable) helped cause the unrest we're seeing now
I never called his supporters racist or deplorable. I am saying that the riots would have not happened had another Republican been nominated, and that it his more the vile language and actions of Trump in particular they are protesting.