+1
I've been consistently amazed at how much stock people put in the idea that just "going after" Hillary is going to completely change the game. As if a) the other candidates wouldn't have and b) most people haven't completely made up their mind about her, anyway.
And if you want to hammer her for past scandals (totally fair), maybe we should, gee, I dunno, perhaps consider not nominating someone who has dozens of his own and creates a new one every week. I know it sounds crazy, but I think it'd have been worth a shot.