First off: I apologize if this is a repeat thread. Did a search, but nothing like this popped for me.
Okay, now onward:
I just got finished watched The Boogeyman about fifteen minutes ago, and either it's a very bad movie, or the writer and director were going for a Hitchcock affect.
Spoiler below (drag your browser over the text if you have a hard time reading it):
I just don't get it. Can anyone shed some light on this please? Maybe if I watched the movie again, I might catch the clues that they'd better have riddled throughout the movie.
Okay, now onward:
I just got finished watched The Boogeyman about fifteen minutes ago, and either it's a very bad movie, or the writer and director were going for a Hitchcock affect.
Spoiler below (drag your browser over the text if you have a hard time reading it):
WARNING: "Boogeyman" spoilers below
Everyone should know what the movie's premise is all about, but there are several things I didn't get. Obviously, the monster-Boogeyman-demon thing could twist space and time. What I don't get is why it focused so much on the main character. And by the end of the movie, it was defeated pretty abruptly. I wasn't sure that the movie was over until I saw the credits. There weren't any explanations whatsoever, so I figured that there must've been a bunch of crap I missed. I think the biggest thing that bothered me was why smashing up those objects/toys defeated the Boogeyman and made it so it couldn't come back. What was its attachment to them? And what about them had given it power and a connection to both the house and the boy?
I just don't get it. Can anyone shed some light on this please? Maybe if I watched the movie again, I might catch the clues that they'd better have riddled throughout the movie.
Last edited by Yoda; 04-29-05 at 02:27 AM.