Worlds Best Vampire Movie?

Bram Stoker’s Dracula is world's best vampire movie....

__________________
I'm a Bollywood-loving guy

Lost Boys

That's what I liked about Blood: The Last Vampire.

Yeah I would agree with the people who said Dracula was the best, even though I'm not in love with it.

__________________
It's only after we've lost everything that we're free to do anything.

__________________
Movie Reviews | Anime Reviews
Top 100 Action Movie Countdown (2015): List | Thread
"Well, at least your intentions behind the UTTERLY DEVASTATING FAULTS IN YOUR LOGIC are good." - Captain Steel

Underworld series.

I enjoyed Vampire Academy a lot!

But it was no interview with the vampire .

Both the original and the Herzog versions of Nosferatu are essential. Abel Ferrera's The Addiction creates a spectacular metaphorical kindship between Vampirism and the decadence of humans in societal structures. Jim Jarmusch's Only Lovers Left Alive shares similar philosophical undertones. Both highly recommended if you're looking for a unique interpretation of the mythos.

For something more light-hearted and comical I'd recommend Roman Polanski's The Fearless Vampire Killers. There's a great performance by Jack MacGowran in the film, and Sharon Tate's scenes are simply stunning.

It's difficult to say which I consider to be the best. I guess it's a toss-up between the aforementioned.

I'm not sure I would call it the world's best vampire movie but I really like A Girl Walks Home Alone At Night.

Herzong's Nosferatu is something I really want to see now that I've seen a couple Herzog movies.

^^^

Solid pick. I really enjoyed that one.

Herzogs Nosferatu (haven't seen Murnau's) or Let The Right One In, for me personally.

I adore FFC's Dracula as well, easily my fave of his after the 70's.

Van Helsing was superior to the underworld films.

Some of them.

The first Underworld and Van Helsing were awful. Haven't seen any of the sequels.

The Underworld series just gets progressively worse after the first one. Van Helsing was also rubbish. Those are your typical Hollywood Blockbuster action movies, with never a thought given to the plausibility of what's going on, or any sense of technical quality in terms of acting, directing, cinematography, or any depth in it's subject matter. The most the first Underworld movie accomplished was some interesting visuals and a creative approach to the concept of vampires and werewolves. But it's really just mindless entertainment and glorified violence.

This is the only word i disagree with Zotis. Film was dull.

Well, I'm not talking about personal appeal though. I'm just saying they were going for entertainment value, not quality. I don't find them entertaining either, but I did when I was younger.

I disagree. I think it plays more along the lines of the Star Trek series, except inverse.

First one was passable.
Second one was ****.
Third one was pretty fun.
Fourth one was super ****.

Quality is neither dependent on or independant of Entertainment.

You can have an extremely well made movie that's boring as sin, but you can also have endless fun with substandard ****.