+2
Actually you're completely wrong, but thanks for writing all that out.
1) I'm not really concerned with the Supreme Court ruling because they've overturned themselves before, thus their decisions are impermanent and somewhat arbitrary based on who owns them at the time. They can rule however they want but it doesn't change the fact that Obamacare is a forced mandate for everyone: anyone who doesn't pay for it will be fined, what's that called?
2) Congress approving illegal activity doesn't make it legal are you sh1tting me
3) Obama has oversight over Fast and Furious, he is at the very least indirectly responsible, even for keeping Holder on the team. As for the IRS and Benghazi scandals, there is plenty of evidence he was involved. I know failing to stop a terrorist attack, let alone in a foreign country, is not illegal, but all these things add up to show how incapable of being a president he is, including not going after any bankers.
4) Obama did not try to close Guantanamo. He made a single, frail motion to see if maybe Congress would possibly consider thinking about considering discussing the possibility of closing Guantanamo. That is not trying. As for torture, Wikileaks, Kiriakou, and Manning alone provide enough evidence that Obama is well aware of and condones torture.
5) Apropos the oil drilling, he is held in contempt of court for going through with the situation. Even under your silly definitions that is illegal. Just like illegal interventions without Congressional consent. Or killing two Americans without a trial.
6) The drones clearly don't affect you at all if they're just a minor perturbation in your view of the Democratic Jesus. Several countries and the EU has called them illegal actions, and since they are international actions, they are thus illegal.
In summation, your definition of opinion is pathetic.
What would he have to do to be subject for impeachment? There's not much left!