Originally Posted by linespalsy
i think that's a good point, i'd also like to question the implicit assumption that institutional, presumably-legal actions can in fact prevent "this sort of thing". as i understand it our [America's] legal system is based on the notion that crimes cant be prevented, only punished. is military law substantially different? to be sure, i think caitlyn's somewhat vague mention of 'preventative measures' imply some degree of acknowledgement of a bigger problem. what about you pidd? do you think there's a "solution"? short of "the end of war", i mean.
I think you are making a very good point about prevention and punishment of crimes. I hadn't thought about that but that might have something to do with the attitude that pissed me off: "Well, what can you do?"...
I'm no military expert by no means, but I have always been of the opinion that this should have been a campaigne under UN flag rather than lead by the USA (and the reason for that not happening is not just USA's "fault" but the rest of the world's too). That would have been a lot better for a lot of reasons. In this matter it would have been better because then USA probably wouldn't have this many soldiers in Iraq, which would mean that the standard of the soldiers would be higher. That would (hopefully) decrease the risk of having sadists in the army since I presume that american military training and army recruiting are among the best and most selective in the world (but apparently only to a certain extent). Furthermore, I am guessing that if it was UN and not USA that was controlling Iraq the situation wouldn't be the same as it is today because then the whole campaigne wouldn't have the nature of an occupation in the same way. And that is ultimately what is pissing the iraqis off the most - liberated or not.
And except for beneath the certain quotes, my previous post wasn't directed exclusively towards Caitlyn if anyone thought so.
Originally Posted by Caitlyn
That is not what I said at all… the actions taken by the Americans and the Iraqis were both in violation of the Geneva Convention… the difference being, the Americans involved will be held accountable for their actions where as the Iraqis were not… not by their government and not by the world in general…
I just don't see what it had to do with the subject. It seemed to me that you brought up what the iraqis had done as an excuse for those soldiers' behaviour, like that they had a reason to do what they did. And I think the whole idea of USA and their allied forces being in Iraq is to hold the Saddam regime accountable for its actions.
And another important difference... This international war crime court (the correct term escapes me). Do you remember the fuss when USA refused to join it and made small 3rd world countries sign contracts promising to never press charges against american soldiers? Well, here you have the reason for it. Iraqi war criminals can be tried in international war crime courts and americans can not.
You know that is not what I meant… and right now, as I was yesterday, I am at a loss as to why you are determined to twist what I said around…
I can't say I was determined to twist anything around really... Actually, I wrote a post, realized I would probably regret it later since I was furious when I wrote it, I rewrote it and quite frankly I can't see what about it that's so mean or nufair. I disagreed with you, or at least with your wording and if I twisted anything around it was to show you how absurd I thought your post was. That's all.
I don't think you, Caitlyn, think that torture is cool. And I never said that either. But I think you and Yoda take a standpoint that instead of supporting a fierce attack on the problem supports the idea of punishing six individuals and then the whole thing will be out of the way. Something that linespalsy also brought up and something that pissed me off.
The investigation into this started months before the media was even involved… the pictures were turned over by another soldier in the same unit to higher ranking officers who blew the whistle… and this is still under investigation… if the soldiers involved, which includes more then the six shown in the pictures, are found guilty, they will be court marshaled and serve time in a military prison…
Fine...
But if I understand it correctly, the Pentagon and all the bigshots in general didn't blow any whistles in particular before the media did. And I would like to know what the CIA guys were up to.
I haven’t seen anyone on here make any excuses for their actions… nor deny that there may be a bigger problem…
Semi-excuse was the word I was using and I was referring to what you said about what iraqis did towards american POW:s. As of deniying a bigger problem I was primarily referring to this post actually:
Originally Posted by Yoda
I'd like to point out that we've arrested six individuals; no one is supporting the actions of these soldiers. I'd also like to point out that they come from a group of 200,000. No country can ever hope to be without people who do these sorts of things when given the opportunity...how they deal with them is what's important. And it appears those involved have been very swiftly arrested. So far, so good.
I read Yoda's post (which I disagree with) and I read Caitlyn's post. I could have just written my post without including any quotes whatsoever or I could have included quotes by both Yoda and Cait. Since Cait's post was written as a response to mine I felt that I should respond to it though and then I took it from there. It's not like I think Cait is the jerk of the board and she and everybody else should know that. My post wasn't directed at her personally.
Originally Posted by Rasputin
Totally agree with your reasoning. I don't appreciate how everyone on here, instead of saying YES the soldiers are doing things like this, they instead try to justify or make excuses for the soliders. In other words they just want to argue. Rep Points for you Piddzilla.
Thank you.
Originally Posted by LordSlaytan
I haven't noticed anyone condoning it either. I think during the heat of the moment Piddzilla misconstrued Caitlyn's remarks, but other than that nada.
And Piddy, you know Caity better than that, bro.
I wouldn't say that I have noticed any condoning either. More like a passive attitude and an acceptance for things like these as something that we can't prevent. Another thing that gets to me is the view that the US army is collectively responsible for the good things it does, while the bad things are results of degenerated individuals.
And now, about two days later, I think I am of the same opinon as I was during the heat of that moment. I like Caitlyn a lot, and no less after this discussion, but I don't see the fact that she's my friend as a guarantee for always agreeing with her.